Purchase decision towards suboptimal food: An analysis of the influence of consumer preference in Selangor
List of Authors
  • Hanani Maisarah Abd Razak , Siti Khadijah Abdullah

Keyword
  • Suboptimal food, Consumer Preference, Environmental Concern, Purchase Decision, Behaviour

Abstract
  • The suboptimal food products define that food may still be consumed but it appears to contrast from the optimal or normal in some aspects in the eyes of the consumer. By assuming consumer do not buy and consume suboptimal food, hence international trade regulation and also retailers have established product requirements that results in goods that do not fulfil such criteria being discarded. Several studies have published statistics on the quantity of food wasted along the food supply chain and in consumer households. Hence, to address the concern of this issue, this study conducted the drivers that influence consumer preferences to consume suboptimal food and also verified the consumer purchase decision. The questionnaire has been conducted with the quantitative method to accomplish the objectives of this research. The target population for this study was the society who live in Selangor, Malaysia. A purposive sample was used in this study and the researcher has targeted 399 respondents as a specific characteristic to do this study. From the data analysis, the hypothesis one and hypothesis two were supported. The result of Pearson correlation presented that it was important whether acceptance of product related with the suboptimal condition (attitude) and perceived quality and safety of food. The results of the study showed that consumer purchase decisions toward the suboptimal foods are significantly related by the acceptance of products associated with suboptimal in appearance condition, date labelling, and its packaging, as well as by the consumer perspective towards the quality and safety of food perceived. Nevertheless, hypothesis three was not supported, whereas this study concluded that the personality measure of consumers towards environmental concern did not directly affect the consumer purchase decision. The future research recommendation were put forward in this research.

Reference
  • 1. Annesha Makhal, K. R. (2020). Normalising the “ugly” to reduce food waste: Exploring the socialisations that form appearance preferences for fresh fruits and vegetables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1025-1039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1908

    2. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of Psychology Test Between Likert Scale 5 and 6 Points. Journal of Social Sciences, 399-403. doi:https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.399.403

    3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    4. Chun Yang, X. C. (2022). Factors Affecting Consumers’ Purchasing of Suboptimal Foods during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Agriculture. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010099

    5. Dzuhailmi Dahalan, H. A. (2020). Malaysian Public’s Concern About the Environment During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Study of a Selected State in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 368-378. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i15/8423

    6. Grunert, K. G. (2005). Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 369-391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/jbi011

    7. Ilona E. de Hooge, M. O.-W. (2017). This apple is too ugly for me!: Consumer preferences for suboptimal food products in the supermarket and at home. Food Quality and Preference, 80-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.012

    8. Isadora do Carmo Stangherlin, J. L. (2019). Consumer behaviour towards suboptimal food products: a strategy for food waste reductio. British Food Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2018-0817

    9. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, A. G. (2018). Consumer in-store choice of suboptimal food to avoid food waste: The role of food category, communication and perception of quality dimensions. Food Quality and Preference. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.020

    10. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, A. G. (2020). Suboptimal food, careless store? Consumer’s associations with stores selling foods with imperfections to counter food waste in the context of an emerging retail market. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121252

    11. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, I. d. (2019). Suboptimal food? Food waste at the consumer-retailer interface. Saving Food, 347-368.

    12. Jingxue Jessica Yuan, S. Y.-H. (2019). US consumers’ perceptions of imperfect “ugly” produce. British Food Journal, 2666-2682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2019-0206

    13. Neo Sau Mei, C. W. (2016). Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Index for Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 668-675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.223

    14. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data. Allen & Unwin.

    15. Robert V. Krejcie, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Phychological Measurement, 607-610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316447003000308

    16. Siddhanth (Sid) Mookerjee, Y. C. (2021). Contents. Journal of Marketing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022242920988656

    17. Song-Lin Wong, C.-C. H. (2018). To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071431

    18. Statistics, T. s. (2021). Department of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal. Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php

    19. Theresa Hartmann, B. J. (2021). Making ugly food beautiful: Consumer barriers to purchase and marketing options for Suboptimal Food at retail level – A systematic review, Food Quality and Preference, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104179.

    20. Uma Sakeran, R. B. (2016). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. John Wiley & Sons.