A qualitative study on violent extremists and news media: how Malaysian online news framed violent extremist groups involved in the Syrian civil war
List of Authors
  • Fahad Riaz , Nurul Miza Mohd Rashid

Keyword
  • Violent extremism, news media, Syrian civil war, Daesh, ISIS, framing theory

Abstract
  • The news has been a place for violent extremist groups to gain recognition internationally. The Syrian Civil war which had involved notorious and internationally recognised violent extremist groups is an example of this phenomenon. However, a limited number of studies had uncovered the thematic variation on how Malaysian online news frames violent extremist groups involved in the Syrian Civil War. Therefore, the present study explored whether the Malaysian news coverage of the violent conflicts that involved violent extremist groups active during the Syrian civil war may shed light on how mainstream news covers violent extremist groups. The present study employed a qualitative search and analysis of two popular online newspapers in Malaysia to identify the types of news frames on the news published during the peak of the Syrian civil war and when a notorious violent extremist group, Daesh (alternatively known as Islamic State (IS) or Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)), had shaken and threatened the world. A total of 272 news articles published between 2010 to 2020 were collected and analyzed. Analysis of the news frames revealed twelve different news frames. The frame with the highest occurrence was labelled as “Western destructive interventions”. The frame detailed out Western nations’ involvement in the war which caused damage to livelihood and civilizations in Syria and justified the violent extremist groups’ activities. The present study concludes that the Malaysian news media framing on violent extremist groups and other parties involved in the Syrian Civil War could have two varied forms, positive (heroic or humanized) or negative (destructive or demonized). The main contribution of this study is that it provides an insight into how Malaysian news media cover a conflict involving Muslim extremist groups. Additionally, the study adds to previous research on how violent extremist groups is framed in digital news.

Reference
  • 1. Abu Bakar, S. Z. and Aslam, M. M. (2019). Ongoing I.S. Radical Ideology in Malaysia: Factors and Counter Strategies. URMAN - The International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 6(3), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2019.6n3.362
    2. All You Can Read (n.d.). Top 30 Malaysian Newspapers Online. https://www.allyoucanread.com/malaysian-newspapers/
    3. Archetti, C. (2013). Terrorism, Communication, and the Media. In Understanding Terrorism in the Age of Global Media (pp. 32-59). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291387_3
    4. Baugut P & Neumann K (2020a). Describing perceptions of media influence among radicalized individuals: The case of Jihadists and non-violent Islamists. Political Communication 37(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663323
    5. Baugut, P. and Neumann, K. (2018). How right-wing extremists use and perceive news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 696-720. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077699018803080
    6. Baugut, P. and Neumann, K. (2019). Journalism’s extraordinary audience: The characteristics and circumstances of news media consumption among Islamists. Journalism, 22(11), 2781-2799. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884919891284
    7. Baugut, P. and Neumann, K. (2020b) Online news media and narrative influence on radicalized individuals: Findings from interviews with Islamist prisoners and former Islamists. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1437-1461. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444819879423
    8. Baugut, P. and Neumann, K. (2020c). Online narrative use during Islamist radicalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1570-1592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1594333
    9. BBC News. (2019). Why is there a war in Syria? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35806229
    10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    11. Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
    12. Cappella, J. N. and Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    13. CNN Editorial Research (2020). ISIS Fast Facts. https://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/08/world/isis-fast-facts/index.html
    14. Gamson, W. A., & Modiglian, A. (1994). The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. In P. Burstein, & P. Burstein (Ed.), Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy (pp. 373-393). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    15. Ghanem, S. (1997). The second level of agenda setting. In M. E. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. H. Weaver, Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    16. Ghersetti, M. & Johansson, B. (2021). To publish or not to publish? Assessing journalism ethics in news about a terrorist attack. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1814-1831. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1971104
    17. Heeren, J., & Zick, A. (2014). Misleading Images: Results from interviews with media producers, journalists and consumers on Muslims and Islam in German Media. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7(1), 46-63. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1163/18739865-00701003
    18. Hellmueller, L., Hase, V., & Lindner, P. (2022). Terrorist organizations in the news: A computational approach to measure media attention toward terrorism. Mass Communication and Society, 25(1), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1936068
    19. Lecheler, S. and de Vreese, H. C. (2018) News Framing Effects. New York: Routledge.
    20. Macdonald, S., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2018). Visual Jihad: Constructing the "Good Muslim" in Online Jihadist magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1559508
    21. Matusitz, J. (2015). Terrorism and Communication: A Critical Introduction. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
    22. Nacos, B. L. (2016). Traditional Media, Terrorism News, and the Virus of Contagion. In Mass-Mediated Terrorism: Mainstream and Digital Media in Terrorism and Counterterrorism (3 ed., pp. 93-114). Plymouth. U.K.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
    23. Nain, Z. (2019) Malaysia. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Available at: https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2019/malaysia-2019/ (accessed November 22 2021).
    24. NST Online (2019). 13 Malaysians who joined Islamic State want to come home. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/03/468558/13-malaysians-who-joined-islamic-state-want-come-home.
    25. Parker, D., Pearce, J. M., Lindekilde, L., & Rogers, M. B. (2019). Press coverage of lone-actor terrorism in the UK and Denmark: shaping the reactions of the public, affected communities and copycat attackers. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(1), 110-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1494792
    26. Powell, K. A. (2011) Framing Islam: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies, 62(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.533599.
    27. Powell, K. A. (2018) Framing Islam/creating fear: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism from 2011–2016. Religions, 9(9), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9090257
    28. Saifuddin, N., & Sualman, I. (2017) The portrayal of Islamic state in selected online newspapers in Malaysia: A Framing Approach. Journal of Media and Information Warfare (JMIW), 9, 101-138. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/42149
    29. Schumann, S., Osborne, D., Gill, P., Fell, B., & Hewstone, M. (2020). Radical news? Immigrants’ television use, acculturation challenges, and support for terrorism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1779782
    30. Striegher, J.-L. (2015). Violent-extremism: An examination of a definitional dilemma. 8th Australian Security and Intelligence Conference (pp. 75-86). Perth, Western Australia: Edith Cowan University. https://doi.org/10.4225/75/57a945ddd3352
    31. Tankard, J. W. (2001) The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In: Reese SD, Gandy OH and Grant AE (eds), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp.95- 105.
    32. Vase.ai. (2019) Malaysia’s 2019 Media Consumption Report. Survey conducted by Vase.ai. https://vase.ai/resources/malaysias-media-consumption-2019
    33. von Sikorski, C., Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Binder, A. (2017). “Muslims are not Terrorists”: Islamic State Coverage, Journalistic Differentiation Between Terrorism and Islam, Fear Reactions, and Attitudes Toward Muslims. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 825-848. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1342131
    34. Weirman, S., & Alexander, A. (2020). Hyperlinked sympathizers: URLs and the Islamic State. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(3), 239-257. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1457204
    35. White, J. (2020). Terrorism and the Mass Media. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. http://www.rusi.org/
    36. Yasin, N. M. (2017). The evolution of online extremism in Malaysia. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 9 (7), 1-6. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26351534