Analysing working from home provisions in the amended employment act 1955 and lessons from the UK
List of Authors
  • Nazruzila Razniza Mohd Nadzri , Nurulbahiah Awang

Keyword
  • employment law, working from home, flexible working arrangements

Abstract
  • The Employment Act 1955 (EA 1955) has undergone a recent change that has added new rules pertaining to flexible working arrangements (FWA) in Malaysia. This could be seen by some employee groups as an appropriate legal response to their demands for the ability to work from home (WFH). But it's unclear how well-founded this viewpoint is and how much the new laws and regulations will have an impact on WFH settings. Thus, the purpose of this research is to examine the idea of WFH, which is included in FWA models, as well as the extent to which the current legal framework—basically, the new statutory requirements included in the EA 1955—regulates employees' ability to request WFH. Drawing a concise comparison with laws and practices in the UK, the aim is to identify commendable practices, enabling the formulation of recommendations to enhance the local legislations. This paper is doctrinal legal research that critically analyse both legal sources and non-legal sources to investigate the intended objectives. The study reveals that, as of now, there is no clear direction regarding the overall regulatory framework concerning FWA and WFH in Malaysia. This lack of clarity is attributed to the recent enforcement of laws on FWA, specifically WFH, since January 1, 2023. Notably, supplementary regulations complementing the existing provisions in the EA 1955 have yet to be introduced. Consequently, the actual impact of the law remains inconspicuous. Moreover, the existing statutory provisions are considered relatively vague potentially leading to various issues. The research further found that, good practices and legal provisions from UK jurisdiction in governing the right of employees to request WFH arrangement would have offered useful guidelines in enhancing the practices and governance of the WFH model.

Reference
  • 1. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) Code of Practice on Handling in a Reasonable Manner requests to Work Flexibly (2014).

    2. Arntz, M. et al. (2022). Working from home, hours worked and wages: Heterogeneity by gender and parenthood. Labour Economics, 76 (22), 102169.

    3. Bevitt, A. (2015, July). Flexible working: what is the current legal position?. Tolley’s Employment Law Newsletter, 70-72.

    4. Commotion Ltd v Rutty [2006] IRLR 172.

    5. Danziger, A. & Boots, S. W. (2008). Memo on the Impact of the United Kingdom’s Flexible Working Act. Workplace Flexibility 2010. Urban Institute. April 30, 2008.

    6. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2021, September). Making Flexible Working the Default. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-flexible-working-the-default

    7. De Miguel, P.S, Caprille, M. and Arasanz, J. (2021). Regulating telework in a post-Covid-19 Europe, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.

    8. Dex, S and Scheibl, F. (2001). Flexible and Family-friendly working arrangements in UK-Based SMEs: Business Cases. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39 (3), 411-431

    9. Employment (Amendment) Act (Act A1651) 2022

    10. Employment Rights Act 1996 (c. 18).

    11. Employment Act 2002 (c. 22).

    12. Employment Relation (Flexible Working) Act 2023 (c. 33).

    13. EU Framework Agreement on Telework (2002).

    14. Haan, K. (2023, June 12). Remote Work Statistics and Trends in 2023. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/remote-work-statistics/#:~:text=As%20of%202023%2C%2012.7%25%20of,to%20a%20hybrid%20work%20model

    15. ILO Home Work Convention 1996 (No. 177).

    16. ILO Home Work Recommendation 1996 (No. 184).

    17. ILO Occupational Safety and Health Convention 1981 (No. 155).

    18. ILO. (2020). An employers’ guide on working from home in response to the outbreak of Covid-19, International Labour Office.

    19. ILO. (2021). Teleworking arrangements during the Covid-19 crisis and beyond.

    20. Lo Tern Chern. (2022, July 10). More flexibility with WFH, The Staronline. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2022/07/10/more-flexibility-with-wfh

    21. Mabel Tambou, S, Noraida Abd Rahim & Mohd Nazri Ahmad Sabar. (2021). The National-International Employee and Employer Perspective on Work from Home DOSM/ILMIA/4.2021/Series 45.

    22. Malaysian Employers Federation (MEF) (2022). Media release: Flexible work arrangements should not be dictated to business but let industries determine based on requirements of business.

    23. Marinsah, S. A., Ationg, R., Othman,I. W., & Muis, A. R. A. (2022). Dasar Bekerja Dari Rumah (BDR) Dan Kesejahteraan Keluarga: Kajian Kes Di Sabah Dan Sarawak. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7 (29), 642-657.

    24. Mohd Ridzauddin Roslan. (2022, December 19). Aturan kerja fleksibel dambaan semua. https://www.kosmo.com.my/2022/12/29/aturan-kerja-fleksibel-dambaan-semua/

    25. Powis, J. and D’Cruz, J. (2023, August 2). What will changes to the UK flexible working regime mean for employers?. https://www.employmentlawwatch.com/2023/08/articles/employment-uk/what-will-changes -to-the-uk-flexible-working-regime-mean-for-employers/

    26. Pyper, D. (2018, October 3). Flexible Working. Briefing Paper, Number 01086.

    27. Ramachandran, S and Arokiasamy, L (2019). Flexible working arrangements in Malaysia: a study of employees’ performance on white colar employees. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 11 (1) Special Issue 551-559.

    28. TalentCorp & UNDP (2021). Making Flexible Work, Work: Towards Better and More Inclusive Work-Life Practices

    29. Thawley, L. (May 2014). Time to limber up? The extended right to request flexible working. Tolley’s Employment Law Newsletter, 51-53.

    30. Wahab, H. A., Razak, S. S. A., & Mahmod, N. A. K. N. (2022). Legal issues in working from home amid Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13 (2), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.7