Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of English for specific purposes (ESP) students
List of Authors
  • Norzila Abdul Razak

Keyword
  • Dominant, Perceived, Preferred, Teaching Styles, ESP

Abstract
  • This study aims to identify the dominant teaching styles of the English Language lecturers as perceived by the students. This study also investigates the perception and preference of the students with respect to their English language lecturers’ teaching styles. Comparisons were made between (i) male and female students’ perceptions with respect to their lecturers’ teaching styles (ii) male and female students’ preferences with respect to their lecturers’ teaching styles and (iii) the students’ perceptions and preferences with respect to their lecturers’ teaching styles. The teaching styles mentioned are based upon Grasha’s Model (1996) consisting of Expert style, Formal Authority style, Personal Model style, Facilitator style and Delegator style. This study is a survey method using 5-point Likert Scale questionnaire as the instrument to collect data. The data collected was analysed using SPSS version 13.0. Simple random sampling was employed in this study. The samples were 175 semester 5 students from the three Engineering Departments of Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah Polytechnic, Shah Alam, Selangor. Descriptive ststistics such as frequency, percentage, mean and deviation were used to describe the respondents’ profile and, perceptions and preferences with respect to their lecturers’ teaching styles. Meanwhile, t-tests were used to analyse the differences between (i) gender with respect to the lecturers’ teaching styles, and (ii) perceived and preferred teaching styles. The results of the study showed that the three most dominant teaching styles of the lecturers perceived by the students were Expert, followed by Personal Model and then Delegator. It was also found that the students’ most preferred teaching style was Facilitator style while Formal Authority style being the least preferred. In terms of gender, there was no significant difference in perceptions as well as preferences between the male and female students in any of the mean scores of all teaching styles. The students’ perceptions and preferences differed significantly in all teaching styles of the Grasha’s Model (1996) except for Expert teaching style. The results demonstrated statistically significant higher scores in terms of preferences to Formal Authority, Personal Model, Facilitator and Delegator styles. There was no significant difference between the students’ perceptions as well as preferences for Expert teaching style.

Reference
  • Beishline, M. J. & Holmes, C. B. 1997. Student preferences for various teaching styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 24(2): 95.
    Bennett, N. 1988. The effective primary school teacher: The search for a theory of pedagogy. Teaching and teacher education. 4(1): 19-30.
    Bennett, N., Jordon, J., Long, G. & Wade, B. 1976. Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books Publishing Limited.
    Conti, G. & Welborn, R. 1986. Teaching learning style and the adult learner. Lifelong Learning. 9(8): 20-24.
    Cook, V. 1991. Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
    Felder, M & Henriques, E. R. 1995. Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals. 28(1): 21 – 31.
    Fischer, B., & Fischer, L. 1979. Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership. 37: 245-254.
    Grasha, A.F. 1994. A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching. 42: 142-149.
    Grasha, A.F. 1996. Teaching with styles. A practical guide to enhance learning by understanding learning and teaching styles. New York: Alliance Publisher.
    Grasha, A.F. & Yangarber-Hicks, N. 2000. Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching. 48(1): 2-9.
    Gregorc, A.F. 1979. Learning/teaching styles: Their nature and effects. In student learning styles. Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
    Gregorc, A.F. 1979. Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leardership. (1): 234-236.
    Hativa, N & Birenbaum, M. 2000. Who prefers what? Disciplinary Differences in Students’ preferred approaches to teaching and learning styles. Research in Higher Education. Vol. 41. No.2.
    Hoyt, Donald P. & Lee, Eun-Joo. 2002. Teaching “styles” and learning outcomes. IDEA Research Report. Kansas State University, Manhattan.
    Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30: 607-610. (online). http://www.coe.unt.edu/Allen/Teaching/5480/samplesize.htm. (20 May 2006).
    Lowman, J. 1984. Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
    Lowman, J. 1995. Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
    Miglietti, Cynthia L., & Strange, C. Carney. 1998. Learning styles, classroom environment preferences, teaching styles, and remedial course outcomes. Community CollegeReview. 26(1): 1.
    Ministry of Higher Education. 2005. Report on the English Language syllabus evaluation. Curriculum Development Division, Department of Polytechnic and Community College Education.
    Ministry of Education. 2003. Research Studies on Polytechnics. Planning and Research Division, Technical Education Department.
    Oxford, R., M. Ehrman & Lavin, R. 1991. “Style wars”: Teacher-student style conflicts in the language classroom,” in Magnan. S, ed., Challenges in the 1990’s for College Foreign Language Programs. Boston: Henle and Henle.
    Ornstein, A.C. & Miller, H.C. 1980. Looking into teaching: An introduction to American Education. Boston: Houghton.
    Richardson T.R, Kring J.P. and Davis S.F. 1997. Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 1(2): 95-107. (online) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18711871 ( 2 December 2006).
    Renzulli, J. & Smith, L. 1984. Learning style preferences: A practical approach for classroom teachers. Theory into Practice 1: 44-50.
    Reinsmith, W. A. 1992. Archetypal forms in teaching: A continuum. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
    Reinsmith, W.A. 1994. Archetypal forms in teaching. College Teaching 42(131-1): 36.
    Roslind Mawing. 2003. The relationship between teachers’ teaching styles with students’ attitude in learning Bahasa Melayu. Masters Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
    Seevers, B.S. 1995. Extensionists as Adult Educators: A Look at Teaching Style Preference. Journal of Extension 33(3). (online) http://www.joe.org/joe/1995june/rb2.html. (20 November 2005).
    Smith, L.H. & J.S. Renzulli. 1984. “Learning style preferences: A practical approach for classroom teachers”. Theory into Practice 23: 44-50.
    Solomon, D. & Kendall, A.J. 1979. Children in classrooms: An investigation of person Environment interaction. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    Spoon, J.C. & Schell, J. W. 1998. Alligning student learning styles with instructor teaching Styles. Journal of Industrial Teaching Education. 35(2): 41-56. (online). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v35n2/spoon.html. (3 June 2006).
    Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Stimpson, P. & Wong M.O.E. 1995. Teaching styles of Hong Kong’s enviromental educators in secondary schools. Research in Education 52: 1-11.
    Vaughn, L & Baker, R. 2001. Teaching in the medical setting: Balancing teaching styles, learning styles and teaching methods. Medical Teacher. 23(6): 610-612.
    Wallace, B. & Oxford, R. L. 1992. “Disparity in learning styles in the ESL classroom: Does this mean war?” AMTESOL Journal 1: 45-68.
    Wittrock, M. C. 1986. Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.