Analisis faktor pengesahan instrumen kemahiran guru pelatih dalam pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD)
List of Authors
  • Nor Junainah Mohd Isa , Zahari Suppian

Keyword
  • Kemahiran PBD, Kesahan, Guru Pelatih, Analisis Faktor Pengesahan.

Abstract
  • Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mendapatkan eviden ciri-ciri psikometrik instrumen kemahiran guru pelatih dalam pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD) menggunakan analisis faktor pengesahan. Seramai 565 orang guru pelatih tahun akhir program ISMP di tiga buah UA telah dipilih menggunakan teknik pensampelan rawak berkelompok. Dapatan analisis faktor pengesahan menunjukkan model pengukuran kemahiran yang telah dihipotesiskan adalah sepadan dengan data di mana nilai indeks padanan adalah memenuhi tahap minimum ditetapkan (CFI>0.9, RMSEA<0.08, dan χ2/df<5). Selain itu analisis turut menunjukkan bahawa prasyarat kesahan konvergen (nilai pemuatan faktor>0.708, nilai AVE > 0.5, dan nilai CR > 0.708) dan kesahan diskriminan (nilai korelasi antara subkonstruk adalah lebih kecil daripada nilai punca kuasa dua AVE bagi kedua-dua subkonstruk berkenaan dan tidak melebihi nilai 0.90) telah berjaya dipenuhi seterusnya memberikan indikator bahawa kesahan konstruk telah berjaya dipenuhi. Berdasarkan kepada analisis yang dijalankan, dapat disimpulkan bahawa instrumen dibina memiliki ciri-ciri psikometrik yang baik untuk mengukur tahap kemahiran guru pelatih dalam PBD.

Reference
  • 1. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Washington, DC: National Council on Measurement in Education. Dimuat turun dari http://buros.org/standards-teacher-competence-educational-assessment-students pada 3 Mei 2014.

    2. Alkharusi, H. (2012). Self-Perceived Assessment Skills of Pre-service and In-service Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 36(2), 9–17.

    3. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Ed. ke-2. New York: The Guilford Press.

    4. Campbell, C. (2013). Research on teacher competency in classroom assessment. Dlm. McMillan, J.H. (pnyt.). SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

    5. Deluca, C., Valiquette, A., Coombs, A., Lapointe-mcewan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2018). Teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: a large-scale survey. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 355–375.

    6. Goodwin, A. L. & Oyler. C. (2008). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: deciding who is ready to teach. Dlm. Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., & McIntyre, D.J (pnyt.). Handbook of research on teacher education. Ed. ke-3. New York: Routledge.

    7. Goh, P. S. C. (2011). Improving teacher competence through the new Malaysian Teacher Standards : exploring the challenges for teacher educators. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education 1(1), 88-99.

    8. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarsted, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Ed. ke-7. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

    10. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah.

    11. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013 -2025.

    12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006 -2010.

    13. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembangunan Pendidikan 2001-2010: perancangan bersepadu penjana kecemerlangan pendidikan.

    14. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modelling. Ed. ke-4. New York: The Guilford Press.

    15. Rohaya Talib & Mohd Najib Abd Ghafar. (2008). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen bagi mengukur tahap literasi pentaksiran guru sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah 2008, 25-27 November 2008, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    16. Schafer, W. D. (1993). Assessment literacy for teachers. Theory into Practice 32(2),118-126.

    17. Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 18(1), 23-27.

    18. Suah, See Ling. (2012). Analisis literasi dan amalan pentaksiran guru sekolah serta kajian tentang jurang antara keduanya. Tesis Dr. Fal, Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    19. Suah, See Ling & Ong Saw Lan. (2012). Investigating assessment practices of in-service teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 4 (1), 91-106.

    20. Suah, See Ling, Ong Saw Lan & Shuki Osman. (2010). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran Pelajar: Amalan Guru-guru di Malaysia. Malaysian Education Deans’ Council Journal 5, 68-83.

    21. Volante, L. & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education 30(3), 749‐770.

    22. Xu, H. (2017). Exploring Novice EFL Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Literacy Development: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0342-5

    23. Zanaton H Iksan, Siti Nor Aishah Mohd Nor, & Siti NorAini Mohd Nor. (2013). Assessment during the integration of lesson study in microteaching among pre-service teachers. Asian Social Science 9(16), 112-119.

    24. Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. a. (2003). Classroom Assessment Practices and Teachers’ Self-Perceived Assessment Skills. Applied Measurement in Education 16(4), 323–342.