The discourses and literacy practices of doing science in English
List of Authors
  • Ramiah, Revathi

Keyword
  • Discourses, literacy practices, qualitative case-study, Teaching Science in English as a medium of instruction, learning and teaching

Abstract
  • In January 2003, Malaysia re-adopted the English language as a medium of instruction for science and mathematics. This change in the medium of instruction brings with it challenges of its own. What does it mean to ‘do’ science in the Malaysian context and to do so in English? How does the change in the medium of instruction from Bahasa Malaysia to English impinge upon the instructional and literacy practices of teachers and learners? What kinds of changes are required of the communities and stakeholders involved in the teaching of science? This article will address these questions by critiquing some dominant assumptions behind the literacy practices of ‘doing’ science in the Malaysian context based upon the findings of a qualitative case study conducted to investigate how two teachers working in diverse and different contexts in Malaysian schools cope with the new medium of instruction.

Reference
  • Aikenhead, G. 2000 Renegotiating the culture of school science. In Millar, R., Leach, J. & Osborne, J. (Eds.). Improving science education: The contribution of research. Buckingham: Open University Press. 245-264.
    Apple, M. 1996. Cultural Politics and Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Ambigapathy Pandian and Revathi Ramiah, 2003, November. Teaching Mathematics and Science in English – Teacher Voice. Paper presented at the ELTC EteMS Conference 2003: Managing Curricular Change, 2-4 December.
    Carter, K. 1993. The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education, Educational Researcher, 22 (1), 5-12.
    Chamot, A.U. and O’Malley, J.M., 1994. The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Approach. Reading: Addison Wesley.
    Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. 2000. Narrative Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. 1988. Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. NY: Teachers College Press.
    Cummins, J. 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Elbaz, F. 1991. Research on teachers’ knowledge: The evolution of a discourse. Journal of Curiculum Studies, 23, 1-19.
    Ellis, C. & Bochner, A.P. (Eds.). 1996. Composing ethnography. Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
    Frankenstein, M. & Powell, A. B. 1994. Paulo Freire’s epistemology and ethnomathematics. In McLaren, P. & Lankshear, C. (Eds.), Politics of Liberation: Paths from Freire. London: Routledge. 74-99.
    Gee, J. P. 2004. Situated Language and Learning: A critique of traditional schooling. NY: Routledge.
    Gutierrez, K.D., Baquedano-Lopez, P. Alvarez, H.H. and Ming Ming Chiu. 1999. Building a Culture of Collaboration Through Hybrid Language Practices. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 87-93.
    Hart, J. E., and Lee, O., 2003. Teacher Professional Development to Improve the Science and Literacy Achievement of English Language Learners. Issues OBEMLA. http://www.ncbe.gwu edu/ncbepubs(10 December 2003).
    Kessler, C. & Quinn M.E. 1987. Esl and Science Learning. ESL Through Content-Area Instruction.(Eds.) Crandall, J. NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Koo Y. L. 2001. Reading as Social Practice" in Marylna Maros and Quah CK (Eds.) Writings in Applied Linguistics, Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Madya Dr. Abdul Aziz Idris, Faculty of Language Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 53 –64.
    Koo Y. L. 2003. "Critical literacy of multilingual/cultural Malaysian learners" in Ambigapathy Pandian, Education in Malaysia @ 21stCentury: practices, prospects. Universiti Putra Malaysia : Malaysia. 30-49.
    Koo Y.L. 2003. "Asian Pacific Perspectives: challenges and issues in multicultural/lingual contexts" in 3L Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, Centre of Language Studies and Linguistics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia., Vol. 8, 1 – 7.
    Koo Y. L. 2004. Multicultural meaning markers: the case of Malaysian ways with words and the world. In Kell, P., Singh, M. & Shore, S. (Eds.) Higher Education in the 21st Century: Global futures in theory and practice. NY: Peter Lang. 55-75.
    Koo Y.L. 2005. Pluriliteracy in diverse contexts; literacy practices around pluralistic texts. In Ambigapathy Pandian, Muhammad Kabarul Kabilan, Sarjit Kaur (eds) Teachers, Practices and Supportive Cultures. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press: Serdang, Malaysia. 226-236.
    Koo Y.L. 2005. "Language, Education and Society in Changing Times: paradoxes, tensions and challenges." In 3L Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, Centre of Language Studies and Linguistics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Vol. 10, 1 – 7.
    Koo Yew Lie, 2007. The pluralist literacies of Malaysian Chinese learners in Higher Education. In Peter Kell & Vogl, G. (eds). Higher Education in the Asia Pacific: Challenges for the future. Cambridge Scholars Press: Newcastle, UK. 178 –201.
    Koo Yew Lie, 2007. The politics of cultural production and meaning-making in ELT: exploring a reflexive pedagogy of pluriliteracy in Higher Education (HE). In Zailan Moris, Hajar Abdul Rahim and Shakila Abd. Manan (eds), 2007. Higher Education in the Asia Pacific: Emerging Trends in Teaching and Learning. IPPTN (Institute of Higher Education Research in Malaysia) and University of Science Malaysia (USM) Press: Penang. 234 – 257.
    Koo Yew Lie, 2007. Internationalising Academic Literacy Practices in English as a Lingua Franca for Teaching and Learning. In Munir Shuib, Sarjit Kaur and Rozinah Jamaludin (eds.), Globalisation and Internationalisation of Higher Education in Malaysia. IPPTN (Institute of Higher Education Research) and University of Science Malaysia (USM) Press: Penang. 51 – 76.
    Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Kumashiro, K. 2004. Against Common Sense: Teaching and learning toward social justice. NY: Routledge Falmer.
    Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Lemke, J. 1990. Talking Science: Language, learning and values. NJ: Ablex.
    McHoul, A. & Grace, W. 1993. A Foucault primer. Discourse, power and the subject. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
    McLaren, P. 2002. Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. NY: Longman.
    Moses, S. 2005, July. Teaching science, Teaching science in English. Keynote address delivered at
    ‘TEACH 2005’: “Teaching Science and Mathematics in English – Tying Up Loose Ends”, Kuching, Sarawak.
    Ministry of Education. 2002. Preface. Curriculum Specifications, Science Form One, Curriculum Development Center, Ministry of Education.
    Munro, P. 1998.Subject to Fiction: Women teachers’ life history narratives and the cultural politics of resistance. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    Pillay, H. 1998. Issues in Teaching of English in Malaysia, The Language Teacher Online, 22.11, http://www.langue.hyper.chubu.ac (10 November 2003).
    Polkinghorne, D. 1995.Narrative Configuration in qualitative analysis. In Hatch, A. J. & Wisniewski, R. (Eds.), Life History and Narrative. London: The Falmer Press. 5-24.
    Riessman, C. K. 1987. When gender is not enough: Women interviewing women. Gender and Society, 1(2), 172-207.
    Sharifah Maimunah Syed Zin, 2003, November. The crucial role of English in the implementation of the ‘Teaching of Mathematics and Science in English” policy with highlights on Support Programmes in English. Paper presented at the ELTC EteMS Conference 2003: Managing Curricular Change, 2-4 December 2003, Kuala Lumpur.
    Stemler, S. 2001. An Introduction to Content Analysis. Based on an article originally appearing in Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation. Available: ERIC Doc No. ED 458218.
    Tobbin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Gallard A.J. 1994. Research on Instructional Strategies for teaching science. In Gabel, D. L. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Wood, L.A. & Kroger, R.O. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.