Meninjau tahap pengetahuan dan perlaksanaan pembelajaran sosial dan emosional dalam kalangan guru Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi (PPKI) sekolah rendah: Satu kajian rintis
List of Authors
  • Aznan Che Ahmad , Mahathir Muhammad

Keyword
  • pembelajaran sosial dan emosional, guru pendidikan khas, pengetahuan guru, pelaksanaan guru

Abstract
  • Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau tahap pengetahuan dan tahap perlaksanaan pembelajaran sosial dan emosional guru pendidikan khas Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi (PPKI) peringkat sekolah rendah Oleh hal yang demikian, satu kajian rintis telah dilaksanakan dengan melibatkan lima orang pakar untuk ujian kesahan muka dan kandungan instrumen soal selidik dan 30 orang responden dalam kalangan guru PPKI sekolah rendah daerah Kuala Kangsar bagi ujian kebolehpercayaan instrumen soal selidik. Indeks Kesahan Kandungan (CVI) dan ujian kebolehpercayaan Alpha Cronbanch digunakan bagi menentukan kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen. Data yang diperoleh telah dijalankan penganalisisan dengan bantuan perisian SPSS versi 21. Analisis statistik yang digunakan ialah analisis deskriptif seperti kekerapan, peratus dan nilai min bagi mengukur bilangan, peratusan serta tahap pengetahuan dan tahap perlaksanaan guru PPKI terhadap pembelajaran sosial dan emosi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai min tahap pengetahuan guru PPKI adalah tinggi iaitu 3.25 dan nilai min tahap perlaksanaan pembelajaran sosial dan emosional guru PPKI juga adalah tinggi iaitu 3.28. Walaubagaimanapun, bagi meningkatkan lagi tahap pengetahuan dan perlaksanaan pembelajaran sosial dan emosional dalam kalangan guru PPKI, maka pembinaan modul, latihan dan perbengkelan dan kursus dalam latihan perkhidmatan wajar diberi perhatian oleh pihak yang berkepentingan.

Reference
  • 1. Ananda Kumar Palaniappan. (2009) Creative teaching and its assessment. In: 12th UNESCO-APEID International Conference with the theme “Quality Innovations for Teaching and Learning”, 24 – 26 March 2009, Bangkok, Thailand

    2. Bahagian Pendidikan Khas (2017) Komponen Kurikulum KSSR Bermasalah Pembelajaran. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

    3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman

    4. Buchanan, R., Gueldner, B. A., Tran, Oanh K., M. & Kenneth W. (2009). Social and Emotional Learning in Classrooms: A Survey of Teachers' Knowledge, Perceptions, and Practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 25(2), 187-203

    5. CASEL (2013). The CASEL Guide: Effective Social and Emotional Learning Programs. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/guide

    6. CASEL (2019) The Importance of Measuring SEL Skills. Retrieved from https://casel.org/focus-on-measuring-sel-skills/

    7. CASEL (2015). CASEL Guide: Effective Social and Emotional Learning Programs Middle and High School Edition. Chicago, IL

    8. Cristóvão, A. M., Candeias, A. A., & Verdasca, J. (2017). Social and Emotional Learning and Academic Achievement in Portuguese Schools: A Bibliometric Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01913

    9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    10. DeNisco, A. (2015). Social-Emotional Learning Enhances Special Education and Beyond. DA: District Administration.

    11. Elias, M. J., Leverett, L., Duffell, J., Humphrey, N., Stepney, C., & Ferrito, J. (2015). Integrating social-emotional learning with related prevention and youth-development approaches. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.). Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 268–316). New York: Guilford Press.

    12. Esen-Aygun, H., & Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2017). Teachers' Views of Social-Emotional Skills and Their Perspectives on Social-Emotional Learning Programs. Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 205-215.

    13. Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. (2000) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. 6th Edition, Wadsworth, New York.

    14. Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., & Guzzo, B. A. (2000). Second Step. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(2), 102–112. doi:10.1177/106342660000800206

    15. Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

    16. Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(01), 117. doi:10.1017/s0954579400006374

    17. Greenberg, M. T. (2010). School-Based Prevention: Current Status and Future Challenges. Effective Education, 2, 27–52

    18. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.

    19. Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and Emotional Learning in Schools: From Programs to Strategies and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33. doi: 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb0

    20. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2020). Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Diambil daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/dasarmenu/falsafah-pendidikan-kebangsaan.

    21. McKown, C. (2017). Social-Emotional Assessment, Performance, and Standards. The Future of Children, 27(1), 157–178. doi:10.1353/foc.2017.0008

    22. Meyers, D. C., Domitrovich, C. E., Dissi, R., Trejo, J., & Greenberg, M. T. (2019). Supporting systemic social and emotional learning with a schoolwide implementation model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73, 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.005

    23. Noor Aini Ahmad, Norhafizah Abu Hanifah (2015) Tahap Pengetahuan Guru Pendidikan Khas Apabila Mengurus Tingkah Laku Murid Bermasalah Pembelajaran: Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education (Volume 30, 2015, Pages 73 To 88)

    24. Philippe, D.L, (2017) Implementing Social Emotional Learning (SEL): An Evaluation of Illinois Teachers' Capacity to Provide Sel Instruction and Use the Illinois SEL Standards. Dissertations. 2839. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2839

    25. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147

    26. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. doi:10.1002/nur.20199

    27. SPSS IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

    28. Stewart, J., & Haswell, K. (2013). Assessing readiness to work in primary health care: the content validity of a self-check tool for physiotherapists and other health professionals. Journal of Primary Health Care, 5(1), 70. doi:10.1071/hc13070

    29. Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 17(2-3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413152