Developing research willpower at one South African University as a strategy to transform higher education institutions: experiences of the mentees
List of Authors
  • Kariyana, Israel , Marongwe, Newlin

Keyword
  • Higher education institutions, research culture, research willpower, teaching and learning, transformation, universities

Abstract
  • Universities are mandated to be institutes thriving on three pillars namely teaching and learning, research and community engagement. Higher education institutions (HEIs), however, value and prioritise these pillars differently and consequently implement them on different scales in their day-to-day operations. HEIs also engage postdoctoral research fellows to partly drive their research operations while developing these fellows to be fully-fledged independent researchers. The objective of this study was to ascertain the extent to which developing research willpower at one South African university was a strategy to transform higher education institutions based on the experiences of two fellows. A case study research design within a mixed method approach was utilised. Stratified random sampling was used to identify the 37 participants for the study. Data was gathered using questionnaires, individual face-to-face interviews, focus group discussions and document analysis. It emerged that developing research willpower in HEIs is a daunting but possible process which is masked by environmental, socio-economic and technological factors. Participants pointed out to existing constraints and possible opportunities to curtail the prevailing negative institutional research culture.

Reference
  • 1. Altmann, G. (2000). The Changing Nature of Strategy Development – Supporting Management Thinking. In G. Altmann, J. Lamp, P.E.D. Love, P. Mandal, R. Smith and M.J. Warren, eds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management. Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 8 – 10 November, 44– 48.
    2. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.
    3. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The Strength Model of Self-Control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.
    4. Duckworth, A. L. (2011). The significance of self-control. Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. PubMed, 108(7), 2639-2640.
    5. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.
    6. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180.
    7. Inzlicht, M., & Berkman, E. (2015). Six Questions for the Resource Model of Control (and Some Answers). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1–14.
    8. Jansen, J. (2003). Mergers in South African Higher Education: Theorising Change in Transitional Contexts. Politikon, 30(1), 27–50.
    9. Magen, E., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: Cognitive reconstrual modulates the reward value of temptations. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 7(2), 415–428.
    10. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J., (1998). Strategy Safari. London: Prentice Hall.
    11. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
    12. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693–2698.
    13. Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524–537.
    14. Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 894–906.
    15. Robinson, M. D., Schmeichel, B. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). A cognitive control perspective of self-control strength and its depletion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(3), 189–200.
    16. Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R.F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 33–46.
    17. Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. (2009). Self-affirmation and self-control: Affirming core values counteracts ego depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 770–782.
    18. Soudien, C., W., Michaels, S., Mthembi-Mahanyele, M., Nkomo, G., Nyanda, N., Nyoka, S., Seepe. et al. (2008). Report of the Ministerial Committee on Transformation and Social Cohesion and the Elimination of Discrimination in Public Higher Education Institutions. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education.
    19. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–322.
    20. Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 379–384.