Urbanization and the changing habitat: the case of the Malay housing compound in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Katiman Rostam , Roslia Ahmad

Keyword
  • Habitat, metropolitan growth, housing compound, plant species, and land use transformation

Abstract
  • The process of urbanization has changed the land utilization and the function of many rural lands in the fringe areas. The rural agricultural areas have rapidly disappeared to make way for residential, industrial and commercial uses. Habitats of the originally rural population are under constant pressure from the growing urbanization and its process can be observed easily through the house’s compound. In rural Malaysia, the compound of each house is an integral part of a home garden. This study discusses the impact of metropolitan growth on the habitat of people in its surrounding areas. The Malay housing compounds in Mukim Dengkil, Selangor have been used to illustrate the change. Compounds of a total of 149 houses from 10 Malay villages in the mukim were chosen systematically. The result shows that in the more urbanized villages, ornamental plants mainly flowers and other species of shrubs occupied most of the housing compounds and other parts of the home garden for decorative and landscaping purposes. Fruit and shade trees as well as vegetables and aromatic plants were still widely planted in the gardens. There were clear indications to suggest that the habitat of Malay housing compounds and home gardens have undergone rapid transformation. The finding also exhibits that the processes of urbanization and industrialization in the region have inevitably changed the farming habits of the households. Modern plant species were preferred by the households for their housing compound. The modernizing habitat of the Malays indicates that the ecosystem and the way of life of the people in the region were actively changing. This undoubtedly will have some implications on the land use and socio-cultural systems of the region in the future that requires appropriate policies to address the issue.

Reference
  • Budowski, G. 1985. Agro forestry in Tropical America: A Review. Paper presented at the The First International Workshop on Tropical Home Gardens, December 2nd-9th 1985, Bandung, Indonesia.
    Chan, Y.K., Hassan, S., Jamaluddin, S.H., Raveendranathan, P., Hussein, M.A., Salleh, M., Rahman, M. & Tan, L.T. 1981. A Report on the Techno-Economic Survey of the Malaysia Fruit Industry 1980. Serdang: MARDI & Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.
    Fernades, E.C.M & Nair, P.K.R. 1986. An Evaluation of the Structure and Function of Tropical Home Gardens. Tokyo: United Nation University Press.
    Gajaseni, J. & Gajaseni, N. 1999. Ecological rationalities of the traditional homegardern system in the Chao Phraya Basin, Thailand. Agro forestry Systems 46: 3-23.
    Gliessman, S.R. 1990. Integrating tress into agriculture: The home gardern agroecosystem as an example of Agro forestry in the tropics, in Agroecology: Reseaching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture, edited by Gliessman, S.R New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Grahn P & Stigsdotter UA. 2003. Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1(3): 1–18.
    Hutton, W. & Cassio, A. 1998. Tropical Herbs and Spices of Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: Periplus.
    Kochhar, S.L. 1981. Tropical Crops: A Textbook of Economic Botany.New Delhi:Macmillan Publishers.
    Konijnendijk CC, Sadio S, Randrup TB & Schipperijn J. 2004. Urban and peri-urban forestry in a development context: strategy and implementation. Journal of Arboriculture 30(5): 269–276.
    MacDicken, K.G. & Vergara, N.T. 1990. Introduction to Agro forestry in Agro forestry: Classification and Management, edited by K.G. MacDicken and N.T. Vergara. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
    Macmillan, H.F. 1991. Tropical Planting and Gardening. (6th Edition). Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Nature Society.
    Marten, G.G. (ed). 1986. Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
    Mock T. 2004. Building a sustainable urban forest. Urban Agriculture Magazine 13: 29–30.
    Nair, P.K.R.1983. Tree integration on farmlands for sustained productivity of small holdings. In Environmentally Sound Agriculture, edited by W. Lockeretz. New York: Praeger.
    Nair, P.K.R. 1990. Classification of Agro forestry systems, in Agro forestry: Classification And Management, edited by K.G. MacDicken and N.T. Vergara. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
    Ninez, V.1987. Household gardern: theoretical and policy considerations. Agricultural Systems 23: 167-186.
    Rostam, K. 1997. Industrial expansion, employment changes and urbanisation in the periurban areas of Klang-Langat Valley, Malaysia. Asian Profile 25 (4): 303-315.
    Terra, G.J.A. 1954. Mixed garden horticulture in Java, Journal of Tropical Geography, 3: 33-43.
    Wiart, C. 2000. Medicinal plants of Southeast Asia. Kelana Jaya: Pelanduk Publication.
    Webb R. 1999. Urban and peri-urban forestry in South-East Asia: a comparative study of Hong Kong, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. In: FAO (1999) Urban and peri-urban forestry: case studies in developing countries. FAO, Rome, pp 30–74.
    Wolf K. 2004. Economic and public value of urban forests. Urban Agriculture Magazine 13: 31–33.
    Yaacoob, O. & Suabhadrabandhu, S. 1995. The Production of Economic Fruits in Southeast Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.