Metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) for reading: co-regulation of cognition
List of Authors
  • Philip, Bromeley

Keyword
  • Mutual regulation; Metacognitive Strategy Instruction; Self-regulated Learning Approach to Strategic Learning; Reading & Learning Strategy

Abstract
  • This paper aims to show how a teacher and ESL learners can successfully engage in mutual regulation of strategy use as they co-construct meaning from the reading text. It focuses on the teacher’s effort at giving direct explanation of various learning strategies for reading, that is, it illustrates how learners are explicitly taught not only the various components of a learning strategy but also the rationales of the “how”, “when” and “where” to use that particular strategy. The study on co-regulation of strategy use adopts a qualitative approach to data collection and analysis. It was conducted via the implementation of a Metacognitive Strategy Instruction (MSI) for academic reading. The instruction session started with an explicit direct explanation of learning strategies that include macro strategies such as planning, comprehension monitoring, problem solving, evaluating and modifying. Subsequently, the learners were taught how to apply the strategies using a strategic processing framework called Self-regulated Learning Approach to Strategic Learning (SRSL) to construct meanings from the reading text. The qualitative account of the learners’ strategy use was elicited using a qualitative retrospective written recall protocol (RWP). The study found that both the High Proficient (HP) and Low-proficient (LP) learners benefited reasonably well from the experience of the MSI sessions. The learners reported on how the strategies helped facilitate their reading process. The key issue revealed in the study is that the MSI sessions have managed to at least prepare if not transform the learners into becoming metacognitively sophisticated readers.

Reference
  • Chamot, A. U., S. Barnhardt, P.B. El-Dinary & J. Robbins. 1999. The learning strategies handbook. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Cohen, A.D. 1998. Strategies in learning and using second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Cross, D. R and S.G. Paris. 1988. Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(2): 131-142.
    Duell, O.K. 1986. Metacognitive skills. In G.D. Phye & T. Andre. (eds.). Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press: 205-239.
    Garner, R. 1990. When children and adults do not use learning strategies: towards a theory of setting. Review of Educational Research. 60: 517-529.
    Greeno, J. G., A.M. Collins & L.B. Resnick. 1996. Cognition and learning. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee. (eds.). Handbook of educational psychology. USA: MacMillan: 15-46.
    Halls, D. & E. Beggs. 1998. Defining learner autonomy. In W.A. Renandya & G.M. Jacobs. (eds.). Learners and language learning: Anthology Series 39. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre: 26-39.
    Johnson-Glenberg, M.C. 2000. Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders: verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(54): 772-782.
    Lorch, R.F., E.P. Lorch & M.A. Klusewitz. 1993. College students’ conditional knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology. 85(2): 239-252.
    MacIntyre, P.D. 1994. Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals. 27(2): 185-194.
    Many, J.E. 2002. An exhibition and analysis of verbal tapestries: Understanding how scaffolding is woven into the fabric of instructional conversations. Reading Research Quarterly. 37(4): 376-407.
    Mason, J. 2003. Qualitative researching. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications.
    Mayer, R.E. & M.C. Wittrock. 1996. Problem-solving transfer. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee. (eds.). Handbook of educational psychology. USA: MacMillan: 47-62.
    Mayer, R.E. & M.C. Wittrock. 1996. Problem-solving transfer. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee. (eds.). Handbook of educational psychology. USA: MacMillan: 47-62.
    McCaslin, M. & D.T. Hickey. 2001. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk. (eds.). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 227-252.
    Meloth, M.S. 1990. Changes in poor readers’ knowledge of cognition and the association of knowledge of cognition with regulation of cognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(4): 792-798.
    Mokhtari, K. & C.A. Reichard. 2002. Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(2): 249-259.
    O’Malley, M.J. & A.U. Chamot. 1990. Learning strategies in Second Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R.L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Palincsar, A.S. & A. Brown. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1: 117-175.
    Paris, S.G. & A.E. Cunningham. 1996. Children becoming students. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee. (eds.). Handbook of educational psychology. USA: MacMillan: 117-147.
    Paris, S.G., M.Y. Lipson & K.K. Wixson. 1983. Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 8: 293-316.
    Paris, S.G., J.P. Byrnes & A.H. Paris. 2001. Constructing theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B.J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk. (eds.). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 253-288.
    Paris, S.G., B.A. Wasik & J.C. Turner. 1991. The development of strategic readers. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil & P. Mosenthal. (eds.). Handbook of reading research. I: 609-640. New York: Longman.
    Philip, B. 2005. Towards a social-motivational metacognitive strategy instruction model: Theory and practice. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
    Pressley, M & P. Afflerbach. 1995. Verbal protocols of reading. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Pressley, M. & C. McCormick. 1995. Cognition, teaching and assessment. New York: Harper Collins.
    Schunk, D.H. 2000. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 3rd Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Sheorey, R. & K. Mokhtari. 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System. 29: 431-449.
    Walczyk, J.J. 2000. The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly 35 (4): 554-566.
    Wenden, A.L. 1998. Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics. 19(4): 515-537.
    Winograd, P. & V.C. Hare. 1988. Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: The nature of teacher explanation. In C.E. Weinstein, E.T. Goetz & P.A. Alexander. (eds.). Learning and study strategies: issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation. San Diego: Academic Press: 121-137.
    Wong, H. 1998. ESL programmes at tertiary level: balancing policy, attitudes and learner realities. In W.A. Renandya & G.M. Jacobs. (eds.). Learners and language learning: anthology series 39. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre: 286-299.
    Woolfolk, A.E. 1993. Educational psychology. 5th Edition. USA: Allyn & Bacon.