Nurturing positive atmosphere in supervisor-supervisee relationship throughout postgraduate studies
List of Authors
  • Nor ‘Adha Abdul Hamid , Rosfazila Abd Rahman

Keyword
  • Supervisor, Supervisee, PhD, relationship, effective

Abstract
  • Student supervision is directly related to student self-development and career. A good supervisor needs to carry out his or her responsibilities effectively towards completing research and student academic project reports. With this, supervisors should help, guide, advise motivate and give academic feedback to students. Students then take responsibility due to honoring the trust given by their supervisor. This study aims to identify the steps and roles that need to be played by supervisors in helping to create students who are able, to graduate within the stipulated period along with further establishing effective supervision. Therefore, two guidelines for student-supervisor relationships for effective supervision is discussed in its usage as guidelines by supervisors and students carrying out research at the postgraduate level. The objective of this study is to review past studies related to student-supervisor relationships in a positive environment and in creating an effective supervisory process. Next, the findings of previous studies are synthesized and summarized by presenting a discussion of specific guidelines to increase effectiveness in the practice and process of supervision of students. This study also simulates nine (9) case studies to address the issues encountered in supervision and discuss possible solutions to such problems. The study found that the supervision as a process of monitoring, assisting and motivating degree research candidates is to obtain quality learning outcomes. The nurturing practice of a positive supervisor-student relationship usually includes a combination of various factors such as the supervisor skills and commitment; the student abilities and commitment; and the existence of clear policies or guidelines at the university level to overcome problems related to candidates and ongoing research. When these three things are given attention by the individual concerned, then the effectiveness of the supervision can be enhanced and nurtured where individual can play a role and understand their respective responsibilities to embrace the supervisor-supervisee positive atmosphere.

Reference
  • 1. Bond, F. (1991). Supervision: Concept and Practice of Management. (4 th edition). USA: South-western Publishing co.

    2. Brown, G. and Atkins, M., 1988. Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London: Methuen.

    3. Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1986). Academic Staff Training in British Universities: Results of a National Survey. Studies in Higher Education, 11(1), 29-42.

    4. Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: AGPS.

    5. Cryer, P., 2000. The Research Student’s Guide to Success. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    6. Delany, D. (Unpublished). A review of the literature on effective PhD supervision. Academic Practice, University of Dublin. Available at: https://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/assets/doc/Effective_Supervision_Literature_Review.doc.

    7. Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1999). The Doctorate: Talking about the Degree. Sydney, Australia: University of Western Sydney.

    8. Dietz, A.J., Jansen, A.D., Wadee, A.A. (2006) Effective PhD Supervision and Mentorship: A workbook based on experiences from South Africa and the Netherlands. South AfricaNetherlands research Programme on Alternatives in Development (SANPAD) Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/15364/ASC-075287668-2362- 01.pdf?sequence=2 (retrieved on 20th November 2020).

    9. Donald, J. G., Saroyan, A. and Denison, D. B., 1995. Graduate Student Supervision Policies and Procedures: A Case Study of Issues and Factors Affecting Graduate Study. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XXV(3), 71-92.

    10. Edwards, B. (2002). Postgraduate supervision: Is having a PhD enough? In Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. Brisbane, Australia.

    11. Grant, B. (2003). Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 24 (2):175-190.

    12. Holdaway, E., Deblois, C. and Winchester, I., 1995. Supervision of Graduate Students. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XXV(3), 1-29.

    13. Haksever, A. M. and Manisali, E., 2000. Assessing Supervision Requirements of PhD Students: The Case of Construction Management and Engineering in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 19-32.

    14. Hockey, J., 1996. Strategies and Tactics in the Supervision of UK Social Science PhD Students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 481-500.

    15. Ibrahim Kamoo (2010, Februari 23). Universiti Penyelidikan (UP) Mampu Pertingkat Pembangunan Negara, Malaysia. Berita Harian. p. 12-13.

    16. Kam, B. H., 1997. Style and Quality in Research Supervision: The Supervisor Dependency Factor. Higher Education, 34, 81-103.

    17. Knowles, S. (1999). Feedback on Writing in Postgraduate Supervision: Echoes in Response-Context, Continuity and Resonance. Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education, 113-128.

    18. Leiden University, 2019, Leiden PhD Career Platform (https://phdcareerplatform.universiteitleiden.nl/en/) (retrieved on 20th November 2020).

    19. Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. New York.

    20. Lovitts, B. E. (2005): Being a good course-taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research, Studies in Higher Education, 30(2): 137-154

    21. McQueeney, E., 1996. The Nature of Effective Research Supervision. A Journal for Further and Higher Education in Scotland, 20(1), 23-31.

    22. Moses, I. (1985). Supervising Postgraduates. Green Guide No. 3. Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, c/o University of South Wales.

    23. Moses, I., 1994. Supervision of Higher Degree Students- Problem Areas and Possible Solutions. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 153-165.

    24. Nor ‘Adha Ab Hamid. 2018. ‘Sukses Harungi PhD’ Panduan Untuk Pelajar dan Penyelia, karyanoradha@gmail.com., ISBN 978-967-16243-0-2.

    25. Pearson, M., & Kayrooz, C. (2004). Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 99.

    26. Powles, M. (1989). How's the Thesis Going?: Former Postgraduates' and Their Supervisors' Views on Completion Times and Dropout. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.

    27. Salmon, P., 1992. Achieving a PhD- Ten Students’ Experience. Staffordshire: Trentham Books Limited.

    28. Seagram, B. C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998). An Investigation of Gender and Other Variables on Time to Completion of Doctoral Degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 319-35.

    29. Spear, R. H., 2000. Supervision of Research Students: Responding to Student Expectations. The Australian National University, Canberra.

    30. Waitie, D., 1994. Understanding Supervision: An Exploration of Aspiring Supervisors’ Definitions. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(1), 60-76.

    31. Woodward, R. J. (1993). Factors affecting research student completion. In15th annual forum of the European Association for Institutional Research. Turhu, Finland.