1. Abdullah, M. Z., Daud, I., Idris, M. R., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2019). Kesan pembelajaran flipped classroom terhadap sikap bagi penyelesaian masalah bagi algebra. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 7(4), 1–10. Retrieved from https://juku.um.edu.my/
2. Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Kompetensi penyelesaian masalah dan pengetahuan konseptual guru matematik sekolah menengah. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 8(3). Retrieved from http://jice.um.edu.my/
3. Akyüz, G. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3907
4. Ali, A. & Harun, N. A. (2017). Hubungan faktor-faktor penguasaan kefahaman konsep matematik dengan minat bagi pelajar sarjana muda pendidikan teknik dan vokasional. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 2(2). Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/
5. Alias, M., Iksan, Z. H., Karim, A. A., Nawawi, A. M. H. M., & Nawawi, S. R. M.. (2020). A novel approach in problem-solving skills using flipped classroom technique. Creative Education, 11(01), 38–53. doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.111003
6. Ariffin, N. E., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2016). Persepsi murid tahun lima terhadap penggunaan kaedah model bar dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat tajuk pecahan. Proceeding of ICECRS (pp. 287–304). doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.613
7. Avvisati, F., Echazarra, A., Givord, P., & Schwabe, M. (2019). The programme for international student. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/
8. Azis, A. A. & Rosli, R. (2021). Analisis aras kognitif bagi soalan dalam buku teks matematik tahun 4 kssr semakan. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities(MJSSH), 6(3), 146–158. Retrieved from https://msocialsciences.com/
9. Cheeseman, J. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of obstacles to incorporating a problem solving style of mathematics into their teaching. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 210–217). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/
10. Chusnul, R. C., Mardiyana, & Retro, D. S. (2017). Errors analysis of problem solving using the Newman stage after applying cooperative learning of TTW type. International Conference and Workshop on Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications (ICWOMAA 2017). doi.org/10.1063/1.5016662
11. Dirgantoro, K. P. S., Saragih, M. J., & Listiani, T. (2019). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa pgsd dalam menyelesaikan soal statistika penelitian pendidikan ditinjau dari prosedur Newman. Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 2(2), 83–96. doi.org/10.19166/johme.v2i2.1203
12. Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
13. Gurat, M. G. (2018). Mathematical problem-solving strategies among student teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3), 53–64. doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110302
14. Hashim, S. H., & Ahmad, M. A. S. (2016). Analisis kesalahan Newman dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik tahun 3. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 6(2), 69–84. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/
15. Hassan, N. H., Hussin, Z., Siraj, S., Sapar, A. A., & Ismail, Z. (2019). Kemahiran berfikir kritis dalam buku teks bahasa melayu kurikulum standard sekolah rendah tahap II. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 7(1), 18–29. Retrieved from https://ejournal.um.edu.my
16. Hendriana, H., Johanto, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The role of problem-based learning to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and self confidence. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 291–300. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov
17. Ismail, F., Nasir, A. A., Haron, R., & Kelewon, N. A. (2021). Mendominasi kemahiran penyelesaian masalah secara kritis melalui penglibatan mahasiswa dalam kokurikulum bulan sabit merah Malaysia. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 2(1), 446–455. Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/
18. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). TIMSS 2019 laporan kebangsaan. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/rujukan-akademik/3918-buku-laporan-timss-2019/file
19. Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2019). Mathematical connection of elementary school students to solve mathematical problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 69–80. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/
20. Layn, M. R., & Kahar, M. S. (2017). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 3(2), 95–102. doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v3i2.855
21. Lee, S. C., Sharma, K., Cosentino, G., Papavlasopoulou, S., & Giannakos, M. (2021). Children’s play and problem solving in motion-based educational games : synergies between human annotations and multi-modal data. IDC ’21: Interaction Design and Children (pp. 408–420). doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460702
22. Liljedahl, P., Trigo, M. S., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In Springer Open. doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_129
23. Maharani, H. R., Sukestiyarno, S., & Waluya, B. (2017). Creative thinking process based on wallas model in solving mathematics problem. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 177–184. doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5783
24. Mahmud, M. S., Yunus, A. S. M., Ayub, A. F. M., & Sulaiman, T. (2020). Enhancing mathematical language through oral questioning in primary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 395–410. doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.19.5.24
25. Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Rosyidah, A. N. K., & Nurmawanti, I. (2019). Problem-solving ability of primary school teachers based on Polya’s method in Mataram City Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 139–149. doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.28686
26. Muhamad, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Salleh, S. M., & Harun, J. (2018). Penggunaan permainan digital dalam pembelajaran bilik darjah bagi meningkatkan kreativiti dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik. Sains Humanika, 10(3), 39–45. doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-2.1486
27. Mulyati, T., Herman, T., & Mulyana, T. (2017). Effect of integrating children’s literature and SQRQCQ problem solving learning on elementary school student’s mathematical reading comprehension skill. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 217–232. Retrieved from https://www.iejme.com/
28. Newman, M. A. (1983). Strategies for diagnosis and remediation. Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
29. Novriani, M. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of student difficulties in mathematics problem solving ability at mts swasta ira medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 63–75. Retrieved from http://gssrr.org/
30. Nurkaeti, N. (2018). Polya’s strategy: An analysis of mathematical problem solving difficulty in 5th grade elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 140–147. doi.org/10.17509/eh.v10i2.10868
31. Peranginangin, S. A., & Surya, E. (2017). An analysis of students’ mathematics problem solving ability in VII grade at SMP negeri 4 Pancurbatu. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 33(2), 57–67. Retrieved from http://gssrr.org/
32. Prakitipong, N., & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of mathematics performance of grade five students in Thailand using Newman procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 111–112. Retrieved from https://cice.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/
33. Putri, D. A., Winarni, R., & Surya, A. (2021). Analisis kesulitan belajar pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan newman procedure pada peserta didik kelas V sekolah dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 9(3). doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v9i3.49193
34. Raifana, S. N., Saad, N. S., & Dollah, M. U. (2016). Analisis jenis kesilapan melalui kaedah newman error dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik dalam kalangan murid tahun 5. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 6(2). Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/
35. Rauf, S. H. A. (2017). Dari teori ke indikator ukuran: kajian penilaian pembentukan jaringan perkhidmatan kebajikan kanak-kanak. The Malaysian Journal of Social Administration, 9(1), 113–129. doi.org/10.22452/mjsa.vol11no1.6
36. Rohmah, M., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). Analysis problem solving in mathematical using theory Newman. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 671–681. Retrieved from https://www.ejmste.com/
37. Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin. (2019). Improving students’ mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in local culture context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966
38. Simamora, R. E., Sidabutar, D. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Improving learning activity and students’ problem solving skill through problem based learning (PBL) in junior high school. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 321–331. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/
39. Singga, A., & Zakaria, E. (2020). Penggunaan model bar dalam kemahiran penyelesaian masalah pecahan tahun 6. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(1), 113-124. Retrieved from http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/
40. Siswandi, E., Sujadi, I., & Riyadi. (2016). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika kontekstual pada materi segiempat berdasarkan analisis newman ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(7), 633–643. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com
41. Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on Polya and Newman theory. International Seminar on Applied Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2019. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
42. Suastika, K. (2017). Mathematics learning model of open problem solving to develop students’ creativity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 569–577. Retrieved from https://www.iejme.com/
43. Sumule, U., Amin, S. M., & Fuad, Y. (2018). Error analysis of Indonesian junior high school student in solving space and shape content PISA problem using Newman procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012053
44. Tawfik, A. A., & Lilly, C. (2015). Using a flipped classroom approach to support problem-based learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(3), 299–315. doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9262-8
45. Uvakaram, S., Tajudin, N. M., & Kamaruddin, A. H. A. (2012). Analisis jenis kesilapan dan strategi penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan dua: satu kajian kes. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 4(1), 60–74. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/
46. Vitaloka, W. P., Habibi, M., Putri, R., & Putra, A. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika materi aritmatika sosial berdasarkan prosedur Newman. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 152–164. doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v9i2.2294
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
48. Wibowo, T., Sutawidjaja, A., As’ari, A. R., & Sulandra, I. M. (2017). Characteristics of students sensory mathematical imagination in solving mathematics problem. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 609–619. Retrieved from https://www.iejme.com/
49. Widodo, S. A., Darhim, D., & Ikhwanudin, T. (2018). Improving mathematical problem solving skills through visual media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012004
50. Wildani, J. (2020). The analysis of students’ difficulties in solving PISA mathematics problems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Islam 2018 (pp. 246–252). doi.org/10.5220/0008520202460252
51. Wong, W. T., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2020). Kemahiran penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik melalui model bar: sorotan literatur bersistematik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities(MJSSH), 5(12), 144–159. Retrieved from https://www.msocialsciences.com/
52. Wulandari, N. P. R., Dantes, N., & Antara, P. A. (2020). Pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik berbasis open ended terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 131–142. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/
53. Yazgan, Y. (2015). Sixth graders and non-routine problems: Which strategies are decisive for success? Educational Research and Reviews, 10(13), 1807–1816. doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2230
54. Yeni, E. M., Wahyudin, & Herman, T. (2020). Difficulty analysis of elementary school students in mathematical problem solving in solutions. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 44–47. Retrieved from http://www.ijstr.org