China and the Indo-Pacific in India-Asean ties: prospects for ASEAN
List of Authors
  • Angelina Gurunathan , Ravichandran Moorthy

Keyword
  • ASEAN-India, RCEP, China, Indo-Pacific, regional economic integration

Abstract
  • India’s trading ties with Southeast Asian nations started in ancient times, sustained during the colonial times and later rekindled in the post-Cold War era. Since India embarked on major economic reforms in 1991, economic partnership had been important in India’s engagements with ASEAN. Nevertheless, the multipolar world of the 21st century had also given rise to new emerging geopolitical realities that inevitably influence the economic domain of the partnership. The main issue this article attempts to address is how in a multipolar world, China influences India’s strategic partnership with ASEAN. The main objective of this endeavour is to highlight the key global dynamics in view of China’s rise mainly related to the Indo-Pacific that shape India’s partnership with ASEAN; and the opportunities for ASEAN in its ties with India moving forward. This is analysed from the conceptual framework of strategic hedging to highlight how the US-China competition of the post-Cold War era influences the foreign policy outlook of India, shaping India’s approach towards ASEAN. The methodology employed for this analysis is a qualitative analysis of primary data obtained from official publications of government websites and portals. Analysis is undertaken chronologically and further substantiated with secondary data from scholarly works, as well as news articles. The findings reveal that since independence, China has featured strongly in India’s geopolitical strategies and therefore China’s strong economic footprints within ASEAN have much bearing on India’s policies towards ASEAN. Nevertheless, India’s strengthening partnership with the major powers of the world within the Indo-Pacific framework also has the potential for spin-off effects for ASEAN’s economic as well as strategic benefits. In conclusion, the developments related to the Indo-Pacific in view of China’s rise, indicate a positive outlook for India-ASEAN partnership which ASEAN could leverage on.

Reference
  • 1. Acharya, A. (2015). India’s Look East Policy. In D. M. Malone, C. R. Mohan, & S. Raghavan (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743538.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198743538-e-33.
    2. Acharya, A. (2019). Why ASEAN’s Indo-Pacific outlook matters. East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/08/11/why-aseans-indo-pacific-outlook-matters/
    3. ASEAN. (2002). Joint Statement of the First ASEAN-India Summit Phnom Penh, 5 November 2002. https://asean.org/?static_post=joint-statement-of-the-first-asean-india-summit
    4. ASEAN. (2016). Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). 3 October. https://asean.org/?static_post=rcep-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership
    5. ASEAN. (2019a). Joint Media Statement: The Sixteenth AEM-India Consultations, 10 September 2019, Bangkok, Thailand. ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/storage/2019/09/AEM-India-16-JMS-FINAL.pdf
    6. ASEAN. (2019b). The ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. ASEAN. https://asean.org/storage/2019/06/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-Pacific_FINAL_22062019.pdf
    7. BBC News. (2019). Trade wars, Trump tariffs and protectionism explained. 10 May. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-43512098
    8. Bhutani, A. (2021). India’s reluctance in joining the RCEP — A boon or a bane in the long-run? ORF Expert Speak, 10 February. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/india-reluctance-joining-rcep-boon-bane-long-run/
    9. Blank, J., Moroney, J. D. P., Rabasa, A., & Lin, B. (2015). What Is India’s Strategy Toward Southeast Asia? In Look East Cross Black Waters - India’s Interest in Southeast Asia (pp. 22–78).
    10. Borah, R. (2020). India and France in 2020: The Indo-Pacific Beckons. The Diplomat, 21 January. https://thediplomat.com/2020/01/india-and-france-in-2020-the-indo-pacific-beckons/
    11. Calonzo, A. (2021). Philippines Warns China of Daily Protests If ‘Militia’ Stays. Bloomberg, 4 April. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-04/china-intends-to-occupy-more-disputed-areas-philippines-says
    12. CFR. (2021). China’s Maritime Disputes. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/chinas-maritime-disputes
    13. Chandrasekhar, C. P. (2021). The Long Search for Stability: Financial Cooperation to Address Global Risks in the East Asian Region’ (No. 153; Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper).
    14. Chatzky, A., & McBride, J. (2020). China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative. Council on Foreign Relations, 28 January. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative
    15. Chaudhury, D. R. (2017). ASEAN wants India to play leadership role in the region. Economic Times, India Times. //economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59471603.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
    16. Chellaney, B. (2007). “Quad Initiative’’: an inharmonious concert of democracies.” The Japan Times, 19 July. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2007/07/19/commentary/quad-initiative-an-inharmonious-concert-of-democracies/
    17. Chia, S. Y. (2013). The ASEAN Economic Community: Progress, Challenges and Prospects. Working Paper ADB Series, October(440), 1–51.
    18. Ching, F. (2008). “Asian Arc” doomed without Australia. The Japan Times, 22 February. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2008/02/22/commentary/asian-arc-doomed-without-australia/
    19. Dasgupta, S. (2013). Most memorable resignations by ministers on moral grounds. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19940115-most-memorable-resignations-by-ministers-on-moral-grounds-808699-1994-01-15
    20. Department of Commerce India. (2021). Foreign Trade (ASEAN). Ministry of Commerce and Industry. https://commerce.gov.in/about-us/divisions/foreign-trade-territorial-division/foreign-trade-asean/
    21. Dept of Statistics Malaysia, & MATRADE. (2021). Trade Performance (Various years). Malaysia’s Trade Performance. http://www.matrade.gov.my/en/malaysian-exporters/services-for-exporters/trade-market-information/trade-statistics
    22. Emmot, R. (2021). EU sets out Indo-Pacific plan, says it’s not “anti-China.” Reuters, 19 April. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/eu-sets-out-indo-pacific-plan-says-its-not-anti-china-2021-04-19/
    23. Filmer, A. (2020). What’s next for Britain in the Indo-Pacific Century? The Sunday Guardian, 25 July. https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/world/whats-next-britain-indo-pacific-century
    24. Gaur, P. (2020). India’s withdrawal from RCEP: neutralising national trade concerns. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1809772
    25. Gilani, I. (2020). India likely to join US to counter China’s global connectivity plans. Anadolu Agency, 27 February. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/india-likely-to-join-us-to-counter-china-s-global-connectivity-plans/1746396#
    26. Goshal, B. (2013). China’s Perception of India’s ‘Look East Policy’ and Its Implications. IDSA Monograph Series, 26(October), 1–158.
    27. Grare, F. (2020). Germany’s New Approach to the Indo-Pacific. Internationale Politik Quarterly, Issue #1 October. https://ip-quarterly.com/en/germanys-new-approach-indo-pacific
    28. Haokip, T. (2014). India’s Look East Policy: Its Evolution and Approach. South Asian Survey, 18(2), 239–257.
    29. IMF. (2021). At a Glance: India. International Monetary Fund, 23 April. https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/IND#whatsnew
    30. Khilnanim, S., Kumar, R., Mehta, P. B., Menon, P. L. G. (Retd. ., Nilekani, N., Raghavan, S., Saran, S., & Varadarajan, S. (2012). NonAlignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century (pp. 1–70). Centre for Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.111.479.1009-a
    31. Khurana, G. S. (2007). Security of sea lines: Prospects for india–japan cooperation. Strategic Analysis, 31(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160701355485
    32. Kuo, M. A. (2018). The Origin of ‘Indo-Pacific’ as Geopolitical Construct: Insights from Gurpreet Khurana. The Diplomat, 25 January. https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/the-origin-of-indo-pacific-as-geopolitical-construct/
    33. Lim, J. (2021). Malaysia – and no Southeast Asian nation – should be bullied by China. The Interpreter, 9 June. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/malaysia-no-southeast-asian-nation-should-be-bullied-china
    34. Limaye, S. P., & Kikuchi, T. (2016). US-Japan Relations and Southeast Asia. Meeting Regional Demands-Project. Report for East West Center, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation, 1–43.
    35. Malone, D. M., & Mukherjee, R. (2010). India and China: Conflict and cooperation. Survival, 52(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396331003612513
    36. Marjani, N. (2019). India Had Good Reason to Pull out of RCEP: The mega-trade deal could have undermined India’s strategic interests in Southeast Asia. The Diplomat, 5 November. https://thediplomat.com/2019/11/india-had-good-reason-to-pull-out-of-rcep/
    37. MCI. (2019). Foreign Trade (ASEAN). Ministry of Commerce and Industry India,. https://commerce.gov.in/InnerContent.aspx?Id=74
    38. MEA. (n.d.). Briefs on Foreign Relations. Ministry of External Affairs India, Briefs on India’s Bilateral Relations - France, Germany and UK. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://mea.gov.in/foreign-relations.htm
    39. MEA. (2018). India-ASEAN Relations. Ministry of External Affairs India: Briefs on Foreign Relations. http://mea.gov.in/aseanindia/20-years.htm
    40. MEA. (2019). Transcript of Media Briefing by Secretary (East) during PM’s visit to Thailand (November 04, 2019). Ministry of External Affairs India. https://mea.gov.in/media-briefings.htm?dtl/32007/Transcript_of_Media_Briefing_by_Secretary_East_during_PMs_visit_to_Thailand_November_04_2019
    41. Mishra, V. (2020). Strategic hedging: That road is narrowing for India. The Deccan Herald, 14 May. https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/panorama/strategic-hedging-that-road-is-narrowing-for-india-837560.html
    42. Murphy, S. A. (2018). Revisiting the Bujang Valley: A Southeast Asian entrepôt complex on the maritime trade route. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 28(2), 355–389.
    43. Nathan, K. S. (2015). The Indian diaspora in Southeast Asia as a strategic asset of India’s foreign and security policy: A Malaysian perspective. Diaspora Studies, 8, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2015.1029712
    44. Nehru, J. (1963). Changing India. Foreign Affairs, 41(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
    45. Nguyen, P., & Vu, K. (2020). Vietnam is warning about Chinese bombers deployed to disputed South China Sea islands. The Business Insider, 21 August. https://www.businessinsider.com/vietnam-warning-chinese-bombers-disputed-south-china-sea-islands-2020-8
    46. Ohashi, H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the context of China’s opening-up policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1564615
    47. P.Panda, J. (2020). India, The Blue Dot Network, And The “ Quad Plus ” Calculus. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, Fall(June), 4–22. https://media.defense.gov/2020/Jul/22/2002460890/-1/-1/1/PANDA.PDF
    48. Panda, A. (2017). Sri Lanka Formally Hands Over Hambantota Port to Chinese Firms on 99. The Diplomat, 11 December. https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/sri-lanka-formally-hands-over-hambantota-port-to-chinese-firms-on-99-year-lease/
    49. Pant, H. V, & Super, J. M. (2015). India’s “non-alignment” conundrum : a twentieth-century policy in a changing world. International Affairs, 4(May), 747–764.
    50. Pehrson, C. J. (2006). String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power across the Asian Littoral. Carlisle Papers in Security Strategy. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA451318
    51. Pejsova, E. (2018). The Indo-Pacific: A Passage to Europe? European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), March. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief 3 The Indo-Pacific_0.pdf
    52. PIEE. (2021). Trump Trade War Timeline. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 17 May. https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/trump-trade-war-timeline.pdf
    53. Pillalamarri, A. (2014). What India Gets Wrong About China. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/what-india-gets-wrong-about-china/
    54. PMO. (2018). Speech by PM Lee Hsien Loong at the Opening Ceremony of the 32nd ASEAN Summit on 28 April 2018. Prime Minister’s Office Singapore, Speech. https://www.pmo.gov.sg/newsroom/pm-lee-hsien-loong-opening-ceremony-32nd-asean-summit
    55. Priya, P., & Ghosh, A. (2020). India’s Out of RCEP: What’s Next for the Country and Free Trade? The Diplomat, 15 December. https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/indias-out-of-rcep-whats-next-for-the-country-and-free-trade/
    56. Raslan, K. (2018). WILL INDIA AND ASEAN COUNTERBALANCE CHINA? South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2130756/will-india-and-asean-serve-counterbalance-china
    57. Sajjanhar, A. (2016). Two Years on, Has Modi’s “Act East” Policy Made a Difference for India. The Diplomat, 3 June. https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/2-years-on-has-modis-act-east-policy-made-a-difference-for-india/
    58. Saraswat, V. K., Priya, P., & Ghosh, A. (2018). A Note on Free Trade Agreements And Their Costs. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog); NITI Aayog. https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/FTA-NITI-FINAL.pdf
    59. SCIO-PRC. (2017). Full text of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Keynote Speech at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.china.org.cn/node_7247529/content_40569136.htm
    60. Sikri, R. (2013a). Chapter 12: Economic Diplomacy. In Challenge and Strategy: Rethinking India’s Foreign Policy (pp. 220–242). SAGE publications.
    61. Sikri, R. (2013b). Chapter 7: “Look East” Policy. In Challenge and Strategy: Rethinking India’s Foreign Policy (pp. 112–129). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03007-3
    62. Singh, B., & Tsjeng, H. Z. (2020). ASEAN Outlook on Indo-Pacific: Seizing the Narrative? RSiS Commentary, 23 January. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/CO20016.pdf
    63. Sipalan, J. (2019). China, Malaysia restart massive “Belt and Road” project after hiccups. Reuters Business News, 25 July 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china- silkroad-malaysia/china-malaysia-restart-massive-belt-and-road-project-after-hiccups-idUSKCN1UK0DG
    64. Tessman, B., & Wolfe, W. (2011). Great powers and strategic hedging: The case of Chinese energy security strategy. International Studies Review, 13(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01022.x
    65. Thakur, R. (1996). The Politics of India’s Economic Liberalisation Agenda. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 3(2), 207–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43198811
    66. Thayer, C. (2018). Code of Conduct. The Diplomat, 3 August. https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/a-closer-look-at-the-asean-china-single-draft-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct/
    67. The Economic Times. (2019). Industry, traders & farmers welcome India’s decision to not sign RCEP. The Economic Times, Retail, 5 November 2019. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/industry-traders-farmers-welcome-indias-decision-to-not-sign-rcep/71915784
    68. The Hindu. (2020). India will never be a part of an alliance system, says External Affairs Minister Jaishankar. 20 July. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-has-never-been-part-of-an-alliance-and-will-never-be-jaishankar/article32142128.ece
    69. Thi Ha, H. (2021). ASEAN Navigates between Indo-Pacific Polemics and Potentials. ISEAS Perspective, 20 April, 49, 1–10. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ISEAS_Perspective_2021_49.pdf
    70. Twining, D. (2015). India’s heavy hedge against China, and its new look to the United States to help. Light or Heavy Hedging: Positioning between China and the United States, 29–41.
    71. U.S. Department of State. (2018). Briefing on The Indo-Pacific Strategy. Briefing; Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, US Department of State. https://www.state.gov/briefing-on-the-indo-pacific-strategy/
    72. USAID. (2019). Advancing Sustainable Infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific Region. Fact Sheet-ITAN. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1861/USAID_ITAN_Fact_Sheet_080719.pdf
    73. USTR. (2017). The United States Officially Withdraws from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Office of the United States Trade Representative, 30 January. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/january/US-Withdraws-From-TPP
    74. USTR. (2020). ECONOMIC AND TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. Office of the United States Trade Representative, Fact Sheet, 15 January. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/phase one agreement/US_China_Agreement_Fact_Sheet.pdf
    75. White House. (2021). FACT SHEET: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Build Back Better World (B3W) Partnership. Statements and Releases, 12 June. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/12/fact-sheet-president-biden-and-g7-leaders-launch-build-back-better-world-b3w-partnership/
    76. Wilson, J. D. (2018). Rescaling to the Indo-Pacific: From Economic to Security-Driven Regionalism in Asia. East Asia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-018-9285-6