Amalan pengintegrasian teknologi guru bukan pengkhususan mata pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) di sekolah menengah berdasarkan model SAMR
List of Authors
  • Cathrine Masingan , Sabariah Sharif

Keyword
  • Pengintegrasian teknologi, Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi, RBT, model SAMR, guru bukan pengkhususan

Abstract
  • Mata pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) diperkenalkan di sekolah menengah pada tahun 2017. Mata pelajaran RBT di sekolah menengah menekankan pengintegrasian teknologi dalam proses pelaksanaan PdPc, sebagai salah satu cara untuk mencapai matlamat mata pelajaran tersebut. Kajian ini merupakan kajian kualitatif yang menerangkan amalan pengintegrasian teknologi guru-guru bukan pengkhususan mata pelajaran RBT di sekolah menengah berdasarkan model SAMR. Kutipan data menggunakan strategi pemerhatian tidak turut serta sebagai sumber data utama dan melibatkan seramai tiga orang guru sebagai peserta kajian yang dipilih berdasarkan pemilihan sampel bertujuan. Dapatan kajian mendedahkan amalan pengintegrasian teknologi guru bukan pengkhususan mata pelajaran RBT di sekolah menengah masih pada tahap yang rendah iaitu hanya pada tahap enhancement atau penambahbaikan. Dapatan kajian ini memberikan implikasi kepada pihak berwajib seperti KPM agar menyediakan kursus dan latihan berterusan kepada guru-guru bukan pengkhususan mata pelajaran RBT di sekolah menengan serta menyelenggara dan melengkapkan kemudahan asas dan peralatan teknologi di sekolah.

Reference
  • 1. Aldosemani, T. (2019). Inservice Teachers’ Perceptions of a Professional Development Plan Based on SAMR Model: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 18(3), 46–53.

    2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    3. Cathrine Masingan, & Sabariah Sharif. (2020). Cabaran Pelaksanaan PTPK Dalam Mata Pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) Di Sekolah Menengah. Journal of Educational Research & Indigenous Studies Journal, 2(1), 1–8.

    4. Cathrine Masingan, & Sabariah Sharif. (2019). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan (PPK) Guru Bukan Pengkhususan Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi (RBT) di Sekolah Menengah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(6), 64-71.

    5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research : Procedures , Canons , and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    6. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (Planning, Conduction And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research) (4th Edition). Pearson.

    7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.

    8. Fazidah Naziri, Mohammad Sattar Rasul, & Haryanti Mohd Affandi. (2019). Importance of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Design and Technology Subject. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 99–108.

    9. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441.

    10. Hilton, J. T. (2016). A Case Study of the Application of SAMR and TPACK for Reflection on Technology Integration into Two Social Studies Classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(2), 68–73.

    11. Inocian, R. (2019). Out-of-Field Social Studies Teaching through Sustainable Culture-Based Pedagogy : A Filipino Perspective. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 230–241.

    12. Kalsum, U., Salleh, M., & Hutagalung, F. (2016). Comparisons of Out of Field and In-Field History Teacher : Teachers ’ and Students ’ Characteristics. 22(8), 1952–1956.

    13. Kihoza, P., Zlotnikova, I., Bada, J., & Kalegele, K. (2016). Classroom ICT integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges from the perspectives of TPACK and SAMR models. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 107–128.

    14. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research A Guide to Design and Implementation (2nd Edition). Jossey-Bass.

    15. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th Edition). Jossey-Bass.

    16. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.

    17. Mobarak, H. M., Wu, H., & Hossain, M. (2017). Effective Teaching Method for Engineering Education from Student ’ s Perspective. International Conference on Engineering Education and Research, March, 1–5.

    18. Mohd Faisal Farish, & Abdul Ghani Abu. (2018). Exploring TPACK domains of Malaysian non-option ESL teachers in an online flipped learning course through Blendspace. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 110–124.

    19. Nasir, A. N. M., Nur Hazirah Noh Seth, Muhammad Khair Noordin, N. S., & Ahmad, A. (2018). Technical Teaching Competency of the Electronic Teachers in Vocational College, Malaysia. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication-TOJDAC, September, 1693–1696.

    20. Nur Syafiqah Isa, & Nurul Nazirah Mohd Iman Ma’arof. (2018). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Grafik Berkomputer Sebagai Alat Bahan Bantu Mengajar Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi. Sains Humanika, 3(3), 81–87.

    21. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 1189–1208.

    22. Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education : Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers , teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89–102.

    23. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). Learning, Technology, and the SAMR Model: Goals, Processes, and Practice. Iste.

    24. Sindi Alivi, J. (2019). A Review of Tpack and Samr Models: How Should Language Teachers Adopt Technology? Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 2(2), 1.

    25. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press.

    26. Zamri Sahaat, & Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri. (2020). Cabaran Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 45(1), 51–59.