Challenges encountered by EFAL learners in mastering a comprehension passage in the fet phase
List of Authors
  • Zano, Kufakunesu

Keyword
  • Reading comprehension, English first additional language, first additional language, additional language, curriculum and assessment policy statement

Abstract
  • Learners’ performance in English first additional language (EFAL) reading comprehension among school learners at most schools in South Africa is a tremendous concern. The aptitude to interpret main ideas from the text constitutes the meaning-making process, which is the comprehension process that is required when reading comprehension passages. Deep comprehension is achieved when a reader progresses beyond literal comprehension to using the text combined with prior knowledge to construct understanding. English is used as a medium of teaching and learning in most South African public schools, although most of these learners are EFAL speakers. To counter this unease, reading comprehension passage strategies become useful. This study aimed to investigate the challenges encountered by EFAL learners in mastering a comprehension passage in the Further Education and Training (FET) phase and how to cope with those challenges in dealing with a comprehension passage. The study employed a qualitative research design to collect data. The sampling frame was 14 EFAL learners in South Africa. The results of the study show that EFAL learners need to use multiple reading comprehension passage strategies including inference to boost their understanding of any comprehension passage in an EFAL setting. Teachers’ immense input is required in equipping EFAL learners with the skills to cope with challenging comprehension passages.

Reference
  • 1. Almutairi, N. R. (2018). Effective Reading Strategies for Increasing the Reading Comprehension Level of Third-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Ph.D. Thesis. Western Michigan University.
    2. Arkarsu, O., & Harputlu, L. (2014). Perceptions of EFL students toward Academic Reading. The Reading Matrix 14(1):315–327.
    3. Barfield, A. (1999). In Other Words: How learner construct Reading Difficulties. Retrieved August 20th, 2020 from http://www.aasa.ac.jp/~dcdycus/LAC99/ bar399.html.
    4. Burgoyne, K, J. M. K., & HE, Whiteley, H.E. (2009). The comprehension of children learning English as an additional language. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79:735-747.
    5. Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J.V. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76,683–696. doi:10.1348/000709905X67610.
    6. Carretti, B., Meneghetti, C., & De Beni, R. (2006). Components of reading comprehension and scholastic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16:291-301.
    7. Castle, T. D. (2014). The Impact Of Cooperative Learning On The Development Of Need For Cognition Among First-Year College Students. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.8j7n5q43.
    8. Cekiso, M. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction on the reading comprehension and strategy awareness of Grade 11 English Second Language learners in the Eastern Cape. Reading & Writing 3(1), Art.#23,8pages.http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/rw.v3i1.23.
    9. Charamba, E. (2020). Translanguaging in a Multilingual Class: a study of the Relation between students’ languages and Epistemological Access in Science. International Journal of Science Education, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1783019.
    10. Charamba, E. (2020). Pushing linguistic boundaries: translanguaging in a bilingual Science and Technology classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development DOI:10.1080/01434632.2020.1783544.
    11. Cooper, L. Z. (2002). Considerations in cross-cultural use of visual information with children for whom English is a second language. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(2), 129-142.
    12. Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
    13. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement – Grades 4–6. English First Additional Language. Pretoria: South Africa.
    14. Elyas, T., & Alfaki, I. (2014). Teaching Vocabulary: The Relationship between Techniques of Teaching and Strategies of Learning New Vocabulary Items. English Language Teaching, 7(10):40-56.
    15. Freeman, D. L., & Long. M. H. (1990). An Introduction to second Language Acquisition Research. Newyork: Longman.
    16. Hammarberg, M. M. K., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction 31(3):498–50.
    17. Hungwe, V. (2019). Using a translanguaging approach in teaching paraphrasing to enhance reading comprehension in first-year students. Reading & Writing 10(1), a216. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/rw.v10i1.216.
    18. King, A. (2007). Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text. In S.D. McNamara (ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies, pp. 267–290, Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.
    19. Kissau, S., & Hiller, F. (2013). Reading Comprehension Strategies: an international comparison of teacher preferences. Research in Comparative and International Education Volume 8(4):437-454.
    20. Klapwijk, N. M. (2012). Reading strategy instruction and teacher change: Implications for teacher training. South African Journal of Education, 32(2):191–204. https:// doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n2a618.
    21. Koca, S., Pojani, V., & Jashari-Cicko, A. (2014). Dictionary use by EFL University students a case study at Korca University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19):74-84. DOI:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p74.
    22. Lei, S. A. (2010). Strategies for improving reading skills among college students. Reading Improvement, 2(1):1-15.
    23. Maja, M. M. (2019). Classroom interaction pedagogy in teaching English First Additional Language to enhance learners’ communicative competence. Per Linguam, Per Linguam 35(1):15-28 http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/35-1-861.
    24. Mboacha, E. (2015). A comparative study of the reading comprehension of English second language learners between urban and rural schools in Limpopo Province. MEd Thesis. The University of Limpopo.
    25. McKeachie, W. J. (1978). Teaching tips: A guidebook for the beginning college teacher. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
    26. Meza, J. M. G. (2017). The Impact of Scanning Reading Strategy in Young EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. MA Thesis. Fundacion Universidad Del Norte.
    27. Molotja, T. W., & Themane, M. (2018). Enhancing learners’ reading habits through reading bags at secondary schools. Reading & Writing 9(1), a185. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/rw.v9i1.185.
    28. Mophosho, M., Khoza-Shangase, K ., & Sebole, L. L. (2019). The reading comprehension of grade 5 Setswana-speaking learners in rural schools in South Africa: Does Home Language Matter? Per Linguam, 35(3):59-73 http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/35-3-844.
    29. Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 27(1):136-145.
    30. Palani, K. K. (2012). Promising reading habits and creating literate society. International Reference Research Journal, 2(1): 91–98.
    31. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.
    32. Pretorius, E. J., & Currin, S. 2010. Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? The effects of an intervention programme on reading in the home and school language in a high poverty multilingual context. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(1):67–76.
    33. Prinsloo, C.H., Rogers, S. C., & Harvey, J. C. (2018). The impact of language factors on learner achievement in Science. South African Journal of Education, 38(1):1-14.
    34. Rahim, F. (2006). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
    35. Saaristo, P. (2015). Grammar is the heart of language: grammar and its role in language learning among Finnish university students. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas (Eds), Voices of pedagogical development - Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning (pp. 279-318). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000296.
    36. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies, in Schmitt N and McCarthy M (eds.) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: CUP.
    37. Scott, L., & Saaiman, E. (2016). Promoting reading skills or wasting time? Students’ perceived benefits of reading in an intermediary programme at the Vaal University of Technology. Reading & Writing –Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa 2079–8245.
    38. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behaviour. William James Lectures at Harvard University. Harvard University Press.
    39. Stott, A., & Beelders, T. (2019). The influence of science reading comprehension on South African township learners’ learning of science. South African Journal of Science, 115(1/2):1-9. https://doi.org/10.17159/ sajs.2019/5146.
    40. Zano, K., & Phatudi, N. C. (2019). Relationship between Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension of South African EFAL high school learners. Per Linguam 35(3):16-28.
    41. Zano, K. (2020). For children without the language of feedback: Multilingualism in promoting peer and teacher feedback. Gender & Behaviour, 18(2):15541-15550.
    42. Zano, K. (2020). High School English Foreign Language Teachers’ Perceptions Related To Multilingualism In A Classroom: A Case Study. Ponte Journal, 76(5/1)1:16-131 DOI: 10.21506/j.ponte.2020.5.9.
    43. Zimmerman, L., & Smit, B. (2014). Profiling classroom reading comprehension development practices from the PIRLS 2006 in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 34(3):1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/201409161101.