Evaluating the social sustainability of urban regeneration initiative in Malaysia : the case of Kuala Lumpur Sentral, Brickfields
List of Authors
  • Anuar Alias , Nik Hazwani Nik Hashim

Keyword
  • urban regeneration, social sustainability, sustainability evaluation, indicators, factor analysis

Abstract
  • Urban regeneration is deemed as an applicable approach in resolving the intricate problems encountered in run-down old cities via numerous initiatives toward the improvement of physical, economic, social, and environmental conditions. Generally, urban regeneration supports sustainable development as it utilizes the already developed land. Nevertheless, implementing this approach poses some setbacks because often the focus is more on accomplishing economic regeneration while overlooking the implications on social and environmental sustainability. This paper aims to investigate the issue in the local context, by evaluating the impacts of urban regeneration initiative implemented in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Certain social sustainability indicators are examined through questionnaire survey conducted to the 400 residents living within 2 km vicinity of Kuala Lumpur (KL) Sentral which is one of the urban regeneration initiatives done in Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur. The resulted analysis indicated there are positive impacts in few indicators following urban regeneration, such as the provision of community benefits as well as the improved living environment. Nonetheless, the implications are inconsequential for other indicators, signifying the needs for a comprehensive method that concentrates more on improving the quality of life for residents living in run-down old cities. This study contributes to the advancement of knowledge in urban regeneration studies in Malaysia by demonstrating that further efforts are crucial to improve the social sustainbaility performance of urban regeneration initiative by integrating the fundamental determinants within the policy framework.

Reference
  • 1. Adair, A., Berry, J. & McGreal, S. (1995). Fiscal policy, taxation incentives and inner-city housing development, Housing Studies, 10(1), 105–115.
    2. Adams, D., & Hasting, E. M. (2001). Urban renewal in Hong Kong: Transition from development corporation to renewal authority. Land Use Policy, 18, 245–258.
    3. Berke, P. (2002). Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1).
    4. Bromley, R., Tallon, A., & Thomas, C. (2005). City centre regeneration through residential development: contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2407–2429.
    5. Chan, E.H.W., & Yung, E.H.K. (2004). Is the development control legal framework conducive to a sustainable dense urban development in Hong Kong? Habitat International, 28(3), 409–426.
    6. Chan, E., & Lee, G.K.L. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85, 243–256.
    7. Chan, E.H.W. & Lee, G.K.L. (2006). Design-led sustainable urban renewal approach for Hong Kong. The HKIA Journal, 46, 76–81.
    8. Chahardowli, M., Sajadzadeh, H., Aram, F. &Mosavi, A. (2020). Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities. Energies, 13, 1–21.
    9. Chiu, R.L.H. (2003). Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: The experience of Hong Kong. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (221–239). USA: Routledge.
    10. Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. (2nd ed.). Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    11. Corbett, J. & Corbett, M. (2000). Designing sustainable communities: Learning from village homes. Island Press, Canada.
    12. Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, andEvaluation: Vol. 10 , Article 7.
    13. Couch, C. & Fraser, C. (2003) Introduction: The European context and theoretical framework, in: C.
    14. Couch, C. Fraser & S. Perry (Eds) Urban Regeneration in Europe, 1–17 (Oxford: Blackwell).
    15. Cuthbert, A.R, &Dimitriou, H.T. (1992). Redeveloping the fifth quarter. Cities, 9(3), 186–204.
    16. Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build “gentrification” and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1165–1190.
    17. De Vaus, D.A. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage Publications.
    18. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999). Sustainable Development Strategy for the UK: A Better Quality of Life. London: HMSO.
    19. DOE (Department of the Environment). (1994). Sustainable Development: the UK Strategy. London: HMSO.
    20. Enyedi, G. (2002). Social sustainability of large cities. Ekistics, 69 (412–414), 142–144.
    21. Ercan, M. A. (2011). Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul. Habitat International, 35, 295–306.
    22. Evans, A. (2003). The development of urban economics in the twentieth century. Regional Studies,37, 521–529.
    23. Ferretti, V. & Grosso, R. (2019). Designing successful urban regeneration strategies through a behavioral decision aiding approach. Cities, 95.
    24. Groves, R., Middleton, A., Murie, A., & Broughton, K. (2003). Neighbourhoods that work. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    25. Ho, S. M. (2001). The land administration system in Hong Kong. Unpublished M.Phil. dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    26. Jones, P., &Gripaios, P. (2000). A review of the BURA awards for best practice in urban regeneration. Property Management, 18(4), 218–229.
    27. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
    28. Lee, G.K.L., & Chan, E.H.W. (2008). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Assessment of Urban Renewal Proposals. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 155–168.
    29. Liu, G., Yi, Z., Zhang, X., Shrestha, A., Martek, I and Wei, L. (2017). An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China.Sustainability,9(1001), 1–17.
    30. Menchawy, A.E. (2008). Urban regeneration in Mediterranean cities: an integrated urban development of Brownfield sites. The Sustainable City V, 117, 115–127.
    31. Ng, M.K., Cook, A & Chui, E. (2001). “The road not travelled”: A sustainable urban regeneration strategy for Hong Kong, Planning Practice and Research, 16, 171–183.
    32. Ng, M.K. (2005). Quality of Life Perceptions and Directions for Urban Regeneration in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 71, 441–465.
    33. Nor, A.R.M. (2009). Statistical Methods in Research. Kuala Lumpur : Prentice Hall.
    34. Raco, M. (2003). Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region. Geoforum, 34(1), 37–55.
    35. Razzu, G. (2004). On the economics of low demand. Cambridge: European Network of Housing Research.
    36. Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    37. Roberts, P., Sykes, H. & Granger, R. (2017). Urban Regeneration. (2nd Ed.).London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    38. Roessner, J. (2000). A decent place to live. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    39. Rosly, D., & Rashid, A.A. (2013). Revitalizing Urban Development in Malaysia Through the Implementation of Urban Regeneration Programme. Paper presented at 43rd Annual Conference of the Urban Affairs Association, San Francisco California, United States of America.
    40. Rothenberg, J. (1969), Economic Evaluation of Urban Renewal: Conceptual Foundation of Benefit-Cost Analysis, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
    41. Rydin, Y. (2011). The Purpose of Planning: Creating Sustainable Towns and Cities. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
    42. Said, S.Y., Aksah, H. & Ismail, E.D. (2013). Heritage Conservation and Regeneration of Historic Areas in Malaysia. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2013) LHE 006, 1–11. Asia Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, London, UK.
    43. Shamsuddin, S. (2011). Townscape Revisited: Unravelling the Character of the Historic Townscapes in Malaysia: UTM Press.
    44. Shutkin, W.A. (2000) The Land That Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press).
    45. Smith, P. C. (2000). Sustainability and urban design. In W. S. Wong & E. H. W. Chan (Eds.), Building Hong Kong: Environmental considerations (17–42). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    46. Turcu, C. (2012). Local experiences of urban sustainability: Researching Housing Market Renewal interventions in three English neighbourhoods. Progress in Planning, 78, 101–150.
    47. Turok, I. (1992). Property-led urban regeneration: panacea or placebo? Environment and Planning A, 24(3), 361–379.
    48. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    49. Yu, J.-H., & Kwon, H.-R. (2011). Critical success factors for urban regeneration projects in Korea. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 889–899.
    50. Zainudin, H., Bachek, S.H. & Haron, N.A. (2014). Preservation of Culture and Built Heritage in New Urban Development: A Case Study on Little India Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur. Conference paper.
    51. Zheng, H.W., Shen, G.Q.P, & Wang, H. (2014). A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41, 272–279.
    52. Zheng, H.W., Shen, G.Q.P., Song, Y., Sun, B., & Hong, J. (2017). Neighborhood sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment framework. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 2017, 44(5), 903–924.