The export competitiveness of the newly industrialised east ASIAN economies: how real is the Chinese threat in electronics?
List of Authors
  • Wilson, Peter

Keyword
  • Asian NIEs, China, electronics exports, shift-share

Abstract
  • This paper examines the export performance of China in electronics compared to the east Asian NIEs exporting to the USA, the European Union, and Japan between 1988 and 2001 using a dynamic version of shift-share analysis to overcome some of the inherent drawbacks of the widely-used static shift-share methodology. Our findings suggest that China has now emerged as a serious contender in the export market for electronic goods, but this position has not been a dominant one. For electronics as a whole, the principal gainers after 1995 appear to be newcomers China and Malaysia at the expense of the older Tigers, like Singapore and Hong Kong. To some extent this represents a natural process of ‘catch-up’. Moreover, no single NIE has dominated all categories of electronic exports. In the east Asian region, the less developed members of ASEAN would appear to be most at risk in the immediate future since they compete head on with China in lower-end manufacturing and are in danger of being ‘leapfrogged’ in the value-added chain. The more advanced NIEs are in a better position since they have time to increase value-added before China catches up and may benefit more from the opportunities China offers in terms of production and service complementarities.

Reference
  • Abeysinghe, T., & Wilson, P. (2002). International competitiveness. In M. K. Chng, W. T. Hui, A. T. Koh, K. L. Lim, & B. Rao. (Eds.), The Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies.
    Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
    Asian Development Bank (ADB), (2002). Key indicators of developing Asian and Pacific countries 2002. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
    Barff, R., & Knight, P. III. (1988). Dynamic shift-share analysis. Growth and Change, 19 (2), 1-9.
    DBSBank, (1992). Singapore’s export competitiveness vis a vis other dynamic Asian Economies. Singapore Briefing, No. 29. Singapore: Economic Research Department, DBSBank.
    Esteban-Marquillas, J. M. (1972). Shift-and-share analysis revisited. Regional and Urban Economics, 2 (3), 249-261.
    Fothergill, S., & Gudgin, G. (1979). In defense of shift-share. Urban Studies, 16 (3), 309-19.
    Fung, K. C., & Lau, L. J. (1998). The China-United States bilateral trade balance: How big is it really? Pacific Economic Review, 3 (1), 33-47.
    Haynes, K., & Machunda, Z. (1987). Considerations in extending shiftshare analysis. Growth and Change, 18 (2), 69-78.
    Hayward, D., & Erickson, R. (1995). The North American trade of U.S. states: A comparative analysis of industrial shipments, 1938-91. International Regional Science Review, 18 (1), 1-31.
    Herschede, F. (1991). Competition among ASEAN, China, and the East Asian NICs - a shift-share analysis. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 7 (3), 290-306.
    Ho, L. S. (1998). Country-of-origin rules: Its origin, nature, and directions for reform. Pacific Economic Review, 3 (2), 161-166.
    International Enterprise Singapore (formerly the Singapore Trade Development Board). Retrieved from www.ie.gov.sg.
    International Monetary Fund, (2002). International Financial Statistics. Washington DC.: The International Monetary Fund.
    Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73 (2), 28-44.
    Lall, S., & Albaladejo, M. (2004). China’s competitive performance: A threat to East Asian Manufactured Exports? World Development, 32 (9), 1441-1466.
    Lall, S., & Weiss, J. (2005). China’s competitive threat to Latin America: An analysis for 1990-2002. University of Oxford, Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper, 120.
    Monetary Authority of Singapore, (2002). Assessing Singapore’s export competitiveness through dynamic shift-share analysis. Economic Policy Department, Monetary Authority of Singapore,
    Occasional Paper No. 23.
    MTI-TDB (2001). Highlights of Singapore’s 2000 trade rankings by the World Trade Organisation. Ministry of Trade and Development (Economics Division) and Trade Development Board (Research
    and Statistics Unit).
    Peebles, G., & Wilson, P. (2002). Economic growth and development in Singapore: Past and future. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Rasiah, R., & Yeo, L. (2005). Learning and innovation: The role of market, government and trust in the information hardware industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (3-4), 400-432.
    Richardson, H. (1978). The state of regional economics: A survey article. International Regional Science Review, 3 (1), 1-48.
    Sen, R. (2000). Analysing international trade data in a small open economy: The case of Singapore. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 17 (1), April.
    Voon, J. P. (1998). Export competition of China and ASEAN in the US market. Asean Economic Bulletin, 14 (3), 273-292.
    Wilson, P., & Goh, K. H. A. (1998). The export competitiveness of dynamic Asian economies, 1986-93: A shift-share analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 3 (2), 237-250.
    Wilson, P., & Wong, Y. M. (1999). The export competitiveness of ASEAN economies 1986-95. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 16 (2), 208-229.
    Wilson, P. (2000). The export competitiveness of dynamic Asian economies 1983-1995: A dynamic shift-share approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 27 (6), 541-565.
    World Bank (2002). World development indicators database. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/data/.
    World Investment Report (2002). UNCTAD. http://www.unctad.org.