1. Abdul Rahim & Mohd Zawawi (2011). Kesesuaian Isi Kandungan, Masa, Kemudahan Dan Alatan Dan Kaedah Tunjuk Cara (Demonstrasi) Dalam Mata Pelajaran Kemahiran Teknikal Dari Perspektif Guru-Guru Kemahiran Hidup Di Sekolah Menengah Di Daerah Kuala Krai, Kelantan. Journal of Technical, Vocational & Engineering Educational, 3. pp. 14-32. ISSN 2231-7376.
2. Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Pengajian Kurikulum. Pencetakan Surya Sdn. Bhd.
3. Ahmad Zamri K. (2017). Assessing Urban and Rural Teachers' Competency in STEM Intergrated Education in Malaysia. MATEC Web of Conference 87, 04004.
4. Asmah Yunos & Muhammad Hussin. (2012). Pembangunan Modal Insan Melalui Transformasi dan Inovasi Pendidikan. Proceeding of International Seminar on Educational Comparative in Competency Based Curriculum Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Rizqi Press.
5. Azizi Hj. Yahaya. (2001). Penggunaan Model Kontek. Input, Proses dan Produk (KIPP) dalam Penilaian Program Pembelajaran. Sejauh manakah ia relevan? International Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher education, Concorde Hotel Shah Alam 16 & 17 July 2001. UTM: Skudai, Johor.
6. Azizi Yahaya, et al. (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Sdn Bhd.
7. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
8. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru (BPG). (2009). Dokumen Panduan Standard Guru Malaysia (SGM). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM).
9. Behrman, J. R. (1996). Measuring the effectiveness of schooling policies in developing countries: Revisiting issues of methodology. Economics of Education Review, 15(4), 345-364.
10. Bhakti, Yoga Budi. (2017). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP pada Proses Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah, Vol. 1, No. 2: 75-82.
11. Bond T. G. & Fox C.M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Ed. ke-3. L. Erlbaum.
12. Bryan W.G (2007). Likert Step Descriptions for Five Steps. EDUR 9131. Advanced Educational Research. Diperolehi daripada: http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur9131/content/likert_step_descriptions.htm
13. Bulhayat, B. (2019). Evaluasi Model CIPP Pada Implementasi KTSP Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Menengah Atas Jombang. Al-Adabiya Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 14(01), 85-102.
14. Chua, Y.P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan: Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan (3rd ed.). Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill.
15. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
16. Coombs, P. H. & Hallac, J. (1987). Cost Analysis in Education: A Tool for Policy and Planning. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Copriady, J. (2014). Teachers Competency in the teaching and learning of chemistry practical. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences.
18. Crispina Gregory K Han (2015). Pengaruh aspek konteks, input dan proses terhadap pencapaian pentaksiran kerja amali Sains. [Tesis PhD, Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Universiti Malaysia Sabah].
19. Daryanto. (2007). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.
20. Fowzia Osman. (1990). Penilaian program peralihan kemahiran hidup (Pilihan B) tingkatan satu di Wilayah Persekutuan. [Disertasi doctoral tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
21. Fuller, E.F. (1969). Concern of Teaching. A Development Conceptualization. American Education Research Journal. 6/2, 207-226.
22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
23. Heyneman, S. P., Farrell, J. P., & Sepulveda-Stuardo, M. A. (1978). Textbooks and achievement: What we know. The World Bank.
24. Heyneman, S. P., Jamison, D., & Montenegro, X. (1983). Textbooks in the Philippines: Evaluation of the pedagogical impact of a nationwide investment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(2), 139-150.
25. Ibrahim, K. (2013). Amalan Penggunaan Bahan Bantu Belajar (BBB) Berasaskan Multimedia Dalam Kalangan Guru Bahasa Arab J-QAF Di Daerah Muar. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia: laporan Projek Sarjana Muda.
26. Jemaah Nazir Sekolah. (2004). Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia Sekolah – Instrumen Pemastian Standard SKPM 1 – Edisi Disember 2004. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
27. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
28. Kamaruddin Md Tahir. (2010). Penilaian Pembangunan Kemahiran Generik Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Kolej Komuniti Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
29. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
30. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia KPM. (2016). Laporan Tahunan Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM).
31. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia KPM. (2018). Laporan Tahunan Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (KPM).
32. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2002). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
33. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55.
34. Lim Bee Yeok. (2008). Tahap Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Masalah Penggunaan Komputer Di Kalangan Guru Di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Alor Gajah. [Tesis Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].
35. Lipham, J. M., & Hoeh, J. A. (1974). The principalship: Foundations and functions. Harper & Row.
36. Liu, S., dan Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese Teachers’ Work Stress and Their Turnover Intention. International Journal of Educational Research (50), 160–170.
37. Lockheed, M., Vail, S.C., & Fuller, B. (1986). How Textbooks Affect Achievement in Developing Countries. Evidence from Thailand.
38. Marina Mad Hashim. (2018). Kesediaan, Sokongan dan Pendekatan Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Oleh Guru Di Peringkat Pra sekolah. [Projek Sarjana Pendidikan, Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].
39. Meschyan, G. dan Hernandez, A. 2002. Is Native-language Decoding Skill Related to Second-language Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(1): 14-22.
40. Mohd Nasaruddin Basran. (2006). Perlaksanaan Kurikulum Bahasa Melayu. [Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya].
41. Mok Song Sang. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Murid dan Alam Belajar. Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.
42. Mugiri, Wahyu Lestari. (2013). Instrumen Evaluasi Program Dana Bos Model CIPP. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2 (1) (2013).
43. Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin & Fatin Aliah Phang. (2012). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge among undergraduate education degree students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 432-440.
44. Nisbet, D.L., Tindall, E.R., & Arroyo, A.A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals in Proquest Journal, 38(1), 100-108.
45. Noorzeliana Idris (2016). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Dalam Kalangan Guru. [Tesis PhD, Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].
46. Nor Ashikin Yusofa & Norkamruzita Saadon. (2005). The Effects of Web-Based Language Learning on University Students' Grammar Proficiency. The 3rd International Conference on e-Learning ICEL2011, 23-24 November 2011, Bandung, Indonesia.
47. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
48. Omoruyi, F. E. O., & Osunde A. U. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of the National Youth Employment and Vocational Skill Acquisition Programme in Midwestern Nigeria. Bonn: Adult Education and Development Institute for International Cooperation of the German Adult Education Association.
49. Ooi Chew Hong & Aziah Ismail. (2015). Sokongan Pihak Pengurusan Sekolah Terhadap Tekanan Kerja Guru Di Sekolah Kebangsaan Dan Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Bil. 2, Isu 2.
50. Oxford, R. L. (1994). Where are we regarding language learning motivation? Modern Language Journal, 78, 512-515.
51. Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum perspectives. In Curriculum planning: A handbook for professionals., (pp. 8–22). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
52. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (1992). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran: Sains Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
53. Radin Mohd Shamsul Zahri. (2008). Penilaian program pentaksiran kerja kursus berasaskan sekolah Teknologi kejuruteraan SPM. [Tesis Ijazah Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Univerisiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
54. Ragget, M. S., & Ragget, P. A. (1978). Studying on A Fulltime and In-Service Degree Course. British Journal of Inservice Education, 4(3), 172-177.
55. Ramlee Mustapha. (2013). Transforming education toward K-Economy in Malaysia Educare. International Journal for Educational Studies, hlm 6.
56. Ranita Manap, Norziah Othman, Siti Nurashidah Roslan, Khairunnisa Ismail & Aimi Fadzirul Kamarubahrin. (2018). Konsep Dan Model Penilaian Terhadap Keberkesanan Program Kerohanian Mahasiswa Institut Pengajian Tinggi Islam (IPTI) Di Malaysia. 5th International Research Management & Innovation Conference (5th IRMIC 2018) Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya 7 August 2018.
57. Salmiah J., Ramiah H., Ab. Rahim B., & Abdullah M.R. (2011). Keprihatinan guru dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah: Perubahan dalam penilaian pendidikan. Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2011. Prosiding Seminar Majlis Dekan-dekan Pendidikan IPTA. Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM).
58. Shane Hall. (2012). How to Use the CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. eHow Contributor.
59. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic Evaluation. Kluwe-Nijhoff.
60. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. Jossey-Bass.
61. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1969). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision making improving educational assessment & an inventory of measures of affective behavior, edited by Walcott H. Beatty (pp. 41-73). The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, NEA.
62. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. In Madaus, G.F, Scriven, M. & Stufflebeam. d.) Evaluation Models, pp. 140-144. Kluwer- Nijhoff.
63. Stufflebeam, D.L. (1987). Professional Standards for Assuring the Quality of Educational Program and Personnel Evaluations. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 125-143.
64. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluations models. New directions for Evaluation, 89, 7-99.
65. Stufflebeam, D. L., Herold & Beulah, M. K. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Annual Conference of Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN).
66. Stufflebeam, D.L., Folely, W.J., Gephart, W.J., Guba, E.G., Hammond R.L., Merriman, H.O., &Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational Evaluation and Decision-making. F.E. Peacock.
67. Subar Junanto & Nur Arini Asmaul Kusna, (2018). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran di PAUD Inklusi dengan Model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP). Journal of Disability, Vol. 5 (2).
68. Sugiyo, S., & Muslikah, M. (2018). Evaluation Models of Guidance and Counseling Service Based CIPP in Senior High School. 4th International Conference on Early Childhood Education. Semarang Early Childhood Research and Education Talks (SECRET 2018). November 2018 ISBN 978-94-6252-615-0.
69. Suryadi, A., Green, M., & Windham, D. M. (1986). Teacher Quality as A Determinant Ofdifferential Mathematics Performance Among Poor-Rural Children in Indonesian Junior Secondary Schools. Pembentangan untuk IMTEC Annual Seminar, Bali, Indonesia.
70. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). Harper Collins.
71. Vagias, W.M. (2006). Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University, Clemson.
72. Vogt, W. P. (1999). Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Non-Technical Guide for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
73. Walden, V. M. (2001). The Comprehensive Approach: An Evaluation Model to Assess HIV/AIDS-Related Behaviour Change in Developing Countries. Evaluation, 7(4), 439-452.
74. Walker, S., & Fraser, B. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: the distance learning environment survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 8(3), 289-308.
75. Warju. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, Invotec XII:1 (2016) 36-42.
76. Warr, P., Bird, M. & Rackham, N. (1970). Evaluation of Management Training. Gower Press.
77. Werner, P. (2004). Reasoned action and planned behavior. In S. J. Peterson & T. S. Bredow (Eds.), Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research (pp. 125-147). Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
78. Windham, D.M. (1988). Improving the Effeciency Educational Analysis-Indicator of Effectiveness and Effeciency. Florida.
79. Windham, D. M., (1990). Indicators of educational effectiveness and efficiency: Improving the efficiency of educational systems. Florida State University.
80. Zawawi Ismail. (2008). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Kemahiran Bertutur Bahasa Arab komunikasi di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama. [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].