Perceived leadership behaviours of school managers and their effects in the implementation of the annual national assessments
List of Authors
  • Kwatubana, Siphokazi , Ntekane, Abram

Keyword
  • Academic performance, national integrated assessment framework, leadership in national assessments

Abstract
  • Research indicates that to improve academic performance, school managers should exert leadership in the implementation of national assessments. This article explores leadership behaviour as a factor that either affords or constrains the effective implementation of the Annual National Assessments (ANAs) in schools. Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership effectiveness was used as a framework to explore the leadership conduct of school managers in three South African schools. This was a qualitative study, approached from a realistic, interpretivist perspective. The study population consisted of school managers and teachers who taught subjects that were evaluated through the Annual National Assessments. The findings were drawn from a case study design, and the data were organised according to Fiedler’s two forces of leadership effectiveness: leadership style and the situational favourableness. The findings show that although the participants mostly favoured Fiedler’s task-orientated leadership style, its effectiveness was hindered by the adverse contexts in which the ANAs were administered. The findings of this study contribute to school leadership and school improvement literature and should inform discussions on how to prepare school managers for the soon to be implemented National Integrated Assessment Framework (NIAF). These results direct the attention of assessment policymakers and facilitators towards conditions in schools that describe its capacity for change and improvement especially regarding annual assessments.

Reference
  • 1. Adam, A. and Nel, C. (2014). ANA as part of a comprehensive reading literacy school assessment system. Journal for Language Teaching, 48(2), 11-35.
    2. Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C., Donovan, J., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. and Rossomme, J. 2003. Methods for Studying Leadership. Accessed 01 August 2018. http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis/Antonakis%20Chapter%2003_5013.pdf. Babbie, E. 2001. The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
    3. Conger, J.A. (1998). Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9(1), 107-121.
    4. Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organisational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
    5. Chisholm, L. and Wilderman, R. (2013). The politics of testing in South Africa. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 89-100.
    6. Department of Education. 1996. South African Schools Act 27. Pretoria: Government Printer.
    7. Fiedler, F.E. (1971). Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 128-148.
    8. Gholami, Z. (2016). The impact of relationship-oriented and task-oriented management styles on organisational climate in Tehran’s high schools. International Journal of Learning and Development, 6(3), 41-54.
    9. Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R. & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: foundations and methodological orientations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18:1.
    10. Heaven, G. & Bourne, P.A. (2016). Instructional leadership and its effect on students’ academic performance. Review of public administration and management, 4:3, 1-20.
    11. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. 1982. Management of organisational behaviour: utilising human resources (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prantice Hall.
    12. Kanjee, A. & Moloi, Q. (2014). South African teachers’ use of national assessment data. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(2), 90-113.
    13. Kohn, L.T. 1997. Methods in case study analysis. The center for studying health system change. Accessed 01 August 2018. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3aec/ 796b904aa86367ee04909f5c4851ec7e8730.pdf.
    14. Lamb, S. 2007. Student resource package: three year roll out benchmark review – Victorian government schools 2008. Report prepared for the Victorian secondary school reform. Accessed 28 January 2018 http://www.dpsk!2.org/pdf/culture.
    15. Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.
    16. Lijuan, L., Hallinger, P. & Walker, A. (2015). Exploring the mediating effects of trust on principal leadership and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(1), 20-42.
    17. Lincoln, Y.V., Lynham, S.A. & Guba, E.G. 2011. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences revisited in qualitative research. In Denzin, K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). The Sage handbook of qualitative research 4th edition pp. 97-128. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    18. Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
    19. Mihai, M. & Nieuwenhuis, J. (2015). Management challenges in an information communication technology (ICT) network in rural schools. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1-10.
    20. Moloi, M.Q. & Chetty, M. 2010. The SACMEQ III Project in South Africa: A Study of the Conditions of Schooling and the Quality of Education. Pretoria: Ministry of Basic Education.
    21. Ndou, N.F. 2008. The role of school management teams in curriculum change management. Pretoria: UNISA.
    22. Noonan, B. & Renihan, P. (2006). Demystifying assessment leadership. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 56(4), 1-20.
    23. Nzoka. J.T. & Orodho, J.A. (2014). School management and students’ academic performance: how effective are strategies being employed by school managers in secondary schools in Embu, North District, Embu County, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(9), 86-99.
    24. O’Donnell, R. & White, G. (2005). Within the accountability era: principal instructional leadership behaviours and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89: 56-70.
    25. Orhodho, A.J. 2014. Coalescing nutrition and health programmes to enhance pupil’s participation in basic education as a panacea to socio-economic development of marginalised communities in Kenya in the 21st century. A paper presented in the Africa Nutrition Conference. North Coast Beach Hotel, Mombasa, Kenya. 10-11 March 2014.
    26. O’Shaughnessy, J. 2013. Patterns of Business Organization. London: Routledge.
    27. Phillips, S. 2005. Assessment literacy. Ontario: Policy Watch, Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.
    28. Rajbhandari, M.M.S. 2013. School leadership en-route to “grand leap”: Case studies from Nepal and Finland. Accessed 28 January 2018 http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/94461.
    29. Rajbhandari, M.M.S. (2017). Leadership actions-oriented behavioural style to accommodate change in schools. Sage publications, 7(4), 1-13.
    30. Rajbhandari, M.M.S., Rajbhandari, S. & Loock, C. (2016). Relations-and task oriented behaviours of school leaders: cases from primary schools in Finland. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), 1-10.
    31. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S.S. & Cha, S.E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020-1030.
    32. Spaull, N. 2013. South Africa’s Education Crisis: The quality of education in South Africa 1994-2011. Johannesburg: Centre for Development and Enterprise.
    33. Spaull, N. (2015). Accountability and capacity in South African education. Education as Change, 19(3), 113-142.
    34. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. 2010. Curriculum Assessment Policy: Further Education and Training Phase Grade 10-12. English First Additional Language. Pretoria: Government Printing.
    35. Spaull, N. 2015. The limitations of the Annual National Assessments (ANAs): what can and can’t we say? Johannesburg: Umalusi, CEPD and Wits school of education seminar.
    36. Spillane, J. 2006. Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    37. Stake, E. 2006. Single cases. In Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
    38. Tabernero, C., Chambel, M.J., Curral, L. & Arana, J.M. (2009). The role of task-oriented versus relationship-oriented leadership on normative contract and group performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37, 1391-1404.
    39. United Nations 2013. A new global partnership: eradicating poverty and transform economy through sustainable development. The report of the high-level panel of eminent persons on the post 2015 development agenda. Nepal: The United Nations.
    40. Verkerk, P.J. 1990. Fiedler's contingency model of leadership effectiveness: background and recent developments. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.
    41. Vroom, V.H. & Jago, A.G. 1988. The new leadership: managing participation in organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    42. Vroom, V.H. & Jago, A.G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17-24.
    43. Waweru, P.N. & Orhodo, A.J. (2013). Management practices and students’ academic performance in national examinations in public secondary schools in Kiambu County. International Journal of Scientific Research, 5(2), 472-479.
    44. Yan-Li, S. & Hassan, D. (2018). Leadership behavior on job satisfaction in Malaysian national secondary schools: motivation and hygiene satisfaction. Malaysian online Journal of Educational Management, 6(3), 46-67.
    45. Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.