Asset valuation: Identifying the best measurement method between current operational value and existing method
List of Authors
  • Suhaili Mohd Hussin , Tengku Rahimah Tengku Arifin

Keyword
  • Asset Valuation, Current Operational Value, Malaysian Public Sector

Abstract
  • Asset management is crucial, especially when reporting and valuing the asset in the financial statements. Efficiency problems might arise when some resources are misused or not utilised at all. The Malaysian government is considering converting its financial statements preparation from a cash basis to a full accrual accounting system. However, there have been numerous delays in it’s implementation. Along with the transition from a cash basis to accrual basis accounting, a system known as Sistem Perakaunan Akruan Kerajaan Negeri (iSPEKS) has been established for local governments. When it comes to assets, the system is utilised to record newly acquired assets using historical costs, with valuation and impairment checks being done occasionally. However, the conservative historical cost measuring approach has drawn criticism because it does not reflect the current asset value. This leads to the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) introducing a different methodology known as the Current Operating Value (COV). COV is a principles-based measurement that reflects the value of an asset held for its operational capacity in its current use and claims to be able to resolve the challenges of applying fair value basis in measuring operational capacity using market, cost, and income. This approach gives a precise indicator of the property's current value. The Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) however, asserts that COV will result in improper measuring bases for items in the property, plant, and equipment (PPE) class that differ in terms of their features, measurement goals, and financial information. The scope to which COV can be the optimum method for appraising assets in public sectors will therefore be examined in this study. The best method will be recommended to assist the government in implementing a systemic and comprehensive approach to asset management and measurement.

Reference
  • 1. Azhar. Z., Norhashim. M., Ahmad. Z., & Mohamed. M. (2019). Public Sector Accounting: Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context. Oxford. Retrieved from https://cw.oxfordfajar.com.my/publicaccess/psa/resourcelibrary/file/Public%20Sector%20Accounting/PPT/Ch06.ppt 2. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82. 3. Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2021). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 114523.Holter, M. T., Johansen, A. B., Ness, O., Brinkmann, S., Høybye, M. T., & Brendryen, H. (2019). Qualitative interview studies of working mechanisms in electronic health: Tools to enhance study quality. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e10354. 4. IPSASB. (2021b). Measurement (Exposure Draft No. 77). Retrieved from https://www.ipsasb.org/publications/exposure-draft-ed-77-measurement 5. IPSASB. (2021c). Measurement of assets and liabilities in financial statements (Exposure Draft No. 76, Conceptual Framework Update: Chapter 7). Retrieved from https://www.ipsasb.org/publications/exposure-draft-ed-76- conceptual-framework-update-chapter-7-measurement-assets-and-liabilities 6. Izzo, T., Paolone, F., & Pozzoli, M. (2021). The future for the replacement cost in the International Public Sector Accounting Standards. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 11(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv11i3p1 7. Jaijairam, P. (2012). Fair Value Accounting vs. Historical Cost Accounting. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS), 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v17i1.7579 8. Kamaliah, K., Marjuni, N. S., Mohamed, N., Mohd-Sanusi, Z., & Anugerah, R. (2018). Effectiveness of monitoring mechanisms and mitigation of fraud incidents in the public sector. Administratie si Management Public, 30, 82-95. 9. Meunier, K. (2012). Historical cost and fair value accounting. Retrieved from http://business-accounting-guides.com/historical-cost/ 10. Mohd Hussin., S., Zainol., S., S., Tengku Arifin., T. R., & Samsuri., A. s., (July 2021). Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Information towards Quality of Financial Reporting in Malaysian Listed Manufacturing Firms. Asian Journal of Research in Business and Management. 3(2). P.102-111. 11. Nobes, C. (1997). Introduction to financial accounting. Berkshire House: George Allen & Unwin. 12. Saleh, Z., Isa, C. R., & Hasan, H. A. (2021) Issues and Challenges in Implementing International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) IPN Journal of Research and Practice in Public Sector Accounting and Management Vol. 11, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1 – 14 13. The Malaysian Association of Certified Public Accountants (2000). Public Sector Accounting Concepts. Retrieved from http://www.micpa.com.my/micpamember/hb-account/sp1.pdf 14. Yusof, Y. (2013). The effectiveness of public sector asset management in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).