Tahap keupayaan murid tahun enam dalam menjana masalah matematik semi-berstruktur
List of Authors
  • Nur Adilla Syafiqah Mohd Shafii , Roslinda Rosli

Keyword
  • Matematik, penjanaan masalah, tahap keupayaan, perbezaan jantina, sekolah rendah

Abstract
  • Pembelajaran Matematik berasaskan penjanaan masalah perlu dititikberatkan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran murid-murid. Hal ini kerana, masih terdapat segelintir murid yang mempunyai tahap keupayaan yang lemah dalam menjana masalah. Kajian mengenai perbezaan antara jantina berkenaan penjanaan masalah juga dilihat tidak begitu banyak dijalankan. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tahap keupayaan penjanaan masalah Matematik semi-berstruktur antara murid lelaki dan perempuan. Selain itu, kajian juga ingin mengenal pasti sejauh manakah perbezaan skor penjanaan masalah Matematik yang signifikan antara murid lelaki dan perempuan. Reka bentuk kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kajian tinjauan. Responden kajian terdiri daripada 41 orang murid tahun enam di sebuah sekolah di Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan. Satu instrumen penjanaan masalah semi-berstruktur yang mempunyai empat soalan digunakan. Data kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis inferensi Ujian-t dua sampel tidak bersandar. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan tahap keupayaan penjanaan masalah Matematik antara murid lelaki dan perempuan masih berada pada tahap yang rendah. Analisis inferensi pula mendapati bahawa tiada perbezaan yang signifikan skor min ujian penjanaan masalah Matematik semi-berstruktur antara murid lelaki dan perempuan. Cadangan kajian lanjutan bagi mengkaji penjanaan masalah Matematik yang melibatkan pelbagai golongan peringkat umur, perbezaan antara jantina perlu diperbanyakkan. Seterusnya, kajian yang menggunakan instrumen soalan penjanaan masalah matematik bebas dan berstruktur juga perlu dijalankan. Secara keseluruhannya, dapat dilihat bahawa kemahiran murid sekolah rendah dalam menjana masalah masih lemah.

Reference
  • 1. Anim, Prasetyo, Y. D. & Rahmadani, E. (2019). Experimentation of problem posing learning model assisted of autograph software to students’ mathematical communication ability in terms of student’s gender. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i2.301

    2. Arikan, E. E. & Unal, H. (2015). An investigation of eighth grade students’ problem posing skills (Turkey sample). International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 23-30. doi: 10.21890/IJRES.28526

    3. Cai, J., Chen, T., Li, X., Xu, X., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., Zhang, L. & Song, N. (2019). Exploring the impact of a problem-posing workshop on elementary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions on problem posing and lesson design. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.004

    4. Calabrese, J., Kopparla, M. & Capraro, M. M. (2020). Examining young children’s multiplication understanding through problem posing. Educational Studies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740976

    5. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (1992). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, Edisi ke-10, Boston, Pearson.

    6. Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan, Edisi ke-2, Kuala Lumpur, Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

    7. Guvercin, S., Cilavdaroglu, A. K. & Savas, A. C. (2014). The effect of problem posing instruction on 9th grade students’ mathematics academic achievement and retention. The Anthropologist 17(1): 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891422

    8. Isrokatun, I., Syahid, A. A., Putri, H. E., Julia, J. & Sunaengsih, C. 2019. Problem posing skill of elementary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, hlm. 1-7. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012124

    9. Kaba, Y. & Sengul, S. 2017. The relationships between middle school students’ problem posing achievements and math problem solving attitudes: Fractions. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, hlm. 256-262. doi: 10.15390/EB.2019.7315

    10. Karakuş, M., Türkkan, B. T. & Öztürk, B. K. 2020. Mathematical and linguistic examination of the problems posed by sixth grade students’. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 7(2): 287-304. https://doi.org/10.33710/sduijes.735814

    11. Kul, U. & Çelik, S. 2020. A Meta-analysis of the impact of problem posing strategies on students’ learning of mathematics. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 12(3): 341-368. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/325

    12. Lednicky, L. 2015. Problem posing as a tool for developing and designing tasks. Acta Mathematica Nitriensia. 1(1): 92-99. doi: 10.17846/AMN.2015.1.1.92-99

    13. Munroe, K. L. 2016. Assessment of a problem posing task in a Jamaican grade four mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education 7(1): 51-58. doi: 10.7916/JMETC.V7I1.788

    14. Norulbiah Ngah, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohamad Said. 2016. Students’ ability in free, semi-structured and structured problem posing situations. Advanced Science Letters 22(12): 4205-4208. doi: 10.1166/asl.2016.8106

    15. Ozdemir, A. S. & Sahal, M. 2018. The effect of teaching integers through the problem posing approach on students’ academic achievement and mathematics attitudes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2018(78): 117-138. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2018.78.6

    16. Ozgen, K., Aydin, M., Gecici, M. E. & Bayram, B. 2019. An investigation of eighth grade students’ skills in problem posing. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning 20(1): 106-130.

    17. Pittalis, M., Christou, C., Mousoulides, N. & Pitta-Pantazi, D. 2004. A structural model for problem posing. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for The Psychology of Mathematics Education, hlm. Vol.4, 49-56.

    18. Rachmawati, Y. I., Sugandi, E. & Prayitno, L. L. 2019. Senior high school students’ ability in posing system of linear equations in two variables problems. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education 4(1): 57-65. doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.6954

    19. Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., Goldsby, D., Gonzalez, E. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Capraro, R. M. 2015. Middle grade preservice teacher’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Dlm. Singer, F., Ellerton, F. N. & Cai J. (pnyt.). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving and creativity in the primary school, hlm. 333-354. Springer, New York, NY.

    20. Saleh, S. F., Purwanto, P. Sudirman, S. & Hidayanto, E. 2020. Pre-service elementary school teachers’ awareness of posing mathematical Pseudo-problems. Journal Technology Education Management Informatics 9(3): 1252-1261. doi: 10.18421/TEM93-54

    21. Sari, N. & Surya, E. 2017. Analysis effectiveness of using problem posing model in mathematical learning. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research 33(3): 13-21.

    22. Tan, R. 2018. Strengthening the students’ achievement in mathematics through problem posing. Science International (Lahore) 30(2): 229-232.