1. Bharucha, J. (2017). An investigation into the walkability problem in Indian cities. Safer Communities, 16(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-02-2017-0010
2. Department of Public Work. (2014). MS1184:2014 Code of Practice on Access for Disabled Persons to Public Buildings.
3. Government of Malaysia. (2014). Law of Malaysia: Person with Disabilities Act 2008.
4. Gray, J. A., Zimmerman, J. L., & Rimmer, J. H. (2012). Built environment instruments for walkability, bikeability, and recreation: Disability and universal design relevant? In Disability and Health Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 87–101). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.12.002
5. Kumar. R. (2011). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners.
6. Land Transport Authority Singapore, & Urban Development Authority Singapore. (2018). Walking and Cycling Design Guide.
7. Law Insider Inc. (2022). Pedestrian facilities definition. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/pedestrian-facilities
8. Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum No 3/PRT/M: Tentang Pedoman Perencanaan, Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarjana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perkotaan.
9. Ministry of Local Government Development. (2011). GP015-A GPP Rekabentuk Sejagat (Universal Design). In Town and Country Department Peninsula Malaysia.
10. Presiden Rebublik Indonesia. (2002). Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 28 of 2002: Concerning buildings.
11. Rosenberg, D. E., Huang, D. L., Simonovich, S. D., & Belza, B. (2013). Outdoor built environment barriers and facilitators to activity among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. Gerontologist, 53(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns119
12. Shinar, D. (2007). Pedestrians. In Traffic Safety and Human Behavior (pp. 613–656). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080555874-015
13. Social and Welfare Department. (2021). Statistik Orang Kurang Upaya Yang Berdaftar.
14. Social and Welfare Department. (2022). Dasar Orang Kurang Upaya. https://www.jkm.gov.my/jkm/index.php?r=portal/left&id=cCtGNGNKVE9obFhBRUl5RERPRjVoUT09
15. Tanan, N., & Darmoyono, L. (2017). Achieving walkable city in Indonesia: Policy and responsive design through public participation. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011598
16. The Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP). (2017). Jakarta NMT Vision and Design Guideline.
17. Torres-Ruiz, M., Moreno-Ibarra, M., Alhalabi, W., Quintero, R., & Guzmán, G. (2018). Towards a microscopic model for analyzing the pedestrian mobility in an urban infrastructure. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0023
18. United Nation. (2022). Article 1- Purpose.
19. United Nations. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2018). Building Disability-Inclusive Societies in Asia and the Pacific : Assessing Progress of the Incheon Strategy. 76.
20. Washburn, S. S., Leistner, D. L., & Ko, B. (2006). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Pedestrian Countdown Signals. In Transport Science and Technology (pp. 311–326). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080467542-024
21. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Disabilities. https://www.who.int/health-topics/disability#tab=tab_1
22. Yen, I. H., Flood, J. F., Thompson, H., Anderson, L. A., & Wong, G. (2014). How design of places promotes or inhibits mobility of older adults: Realist synthesis of 20 years of research. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1340–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314527610
23. Zacharias, J. (2009). The Pedestrian Itinerary–Purposes, Environmental Factors and Path Decisions. In Pedestrian Behavior (pp. 283–306). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781848557512-013