Corporate governance and sustainable circular economy with eco-innovation as mediator and customers’ pressure as moderator
List of Authors
  • Sofri Yahya , Wang Chu

Keyword
  • Sustainable Circular Economy, Eco-Innovation, Resource-Based Theory, Stakeholder Pressure, Corporate Governance

Abstract
  • In the context of speed up economic development, numerous environmental and social issues have emerged. Existing research primarily concentrates on circular economy (CE) and sustainability to solve these problems, but the relationship between CE and sustainability is tenuous. Sustainable circular economy (SCE) was proposed to strengthen the relationship between CE and sustainability. However, research on SCE remains dispersed and insufficient. To comprehensively explore SCE at company level, this research proposes a conceptual framework how corporate governance affect SCE based on resource-based view. In this framework, corporate governance factors (gender and generational diversity of the board, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, CEO with business educational background, and CEO tenure) can positively affect SCE through the mediation role of eco-innovation, and customers’ pressure can positively moderate the relationship between corporate governance and eco-innovation. This article fulfils the lack of research on SCE, and it provides company managers with decision-making guidance to improve corporate governance structure to enhance SCE performance.

Reference
  • 1. Adu-Danso, E., & Abbey, E. (2022). Does foreign ownership enhance technological innovation amongst manufacturing firms in Sub-Saharan Africa? Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 34(2), 195–221. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1771813

    2. Aghion, P., Van Reenen, J., & Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277–304. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.277

    3. Ahinful, G. S., Tauringana, V., Essuman, D., Boakye, J. D., & Sha’ven, W. B. (2022). Stakeholders pressure, SMEs characteristics and environmental management in Ghana. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 34(3), 241–268. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1545890

    4. Alamerew, Y. A., & Brissaud, D. (2019). Circular economy assessment tool for end of life product recovery strategies. Journal of Remanufacturing, 9(3), 169–185. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-018-0064-8

    5. Al-Gamrh, B., Al-Dhamari, R., Jalan, A., & Afshar Jahanshahi, A. (2020). The impact of board independence and foreign ownership on financial and social performance of firms: Evidence from the UAE. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 201–229. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2018-0147

    6. Alhadid, A. Y., Abu-Rumman, A. H., & Abu-Rumman, A. H. (2014). The Impact of Green Innovation on Organizational Performance, Environmental Management Behavior as a Moderate Variable: An Analytical Study on Nuqul Group in Jordan. International Journal of Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n7p51

    7. Almagtome, A., Khaghaany, M., & Önce, S. (2020). Corporate governance quality, stakeholders’ pressure, and sustainable development: An integrated approach. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 5(6), 1077–1090. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.6.082

    8. Al-Swidi, A. K., Al-Hakimi, M. A., Gelaidan, H. M., & Al-Temimi, S. K. A. J. (2022). How does consumer pressure affect green innovation of manufacturing SMEs in the presence of green human resource management and green values? A moderated mediation analysis. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12459

    9. Angeline, T. (n.d.). Managing generational diversity at the workplace: Expectations and perceptions of different generations of employees. Afr. J. Bus. Manage.

    10. Ar, I. M. (2012). The Impact of Green Product Innovation on Firm Performance and Competitive Capability: The Moderating Role of Managerial Environmental Concern. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.144

    11. Arayssi, M., Dah, M., & Jizi, M. (2016). Women on boards, sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 376–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2015-0055

    12. Bannò, M., Coller, G., & D’Allura, G. M. (2021). Family firms, women, and innovation. Sinergie, 39(2), 59–74. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.7433/S115.2021.04

    13. Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187

    14. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

    15. Cai, W., & Zhou, X. (2014). On the drivers of eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.035

    16. Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A., & Mazzanti, M. (2020). Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms. Research Policy, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827

    17. Chairina, C., & Tjahjadi, B. (2023). Green Governance and Sustainability Report Quality: The Moderating Role of Sustainability Commitment in ASEAN Countries. Economies, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010027

    18. Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Evans, K. P. (2018). Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 48, 236–254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2018.07.003

    19. Chen, R., Tong, J. Y., Zhang, F. F., & Zhou, G. S. (2021). Do female directors enhance R&D performance? International Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 253–275. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.003

    20. Cho, C. K., Cho, T. S., & Lee, J. (2019). Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1668

    21. Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. (2011). Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3), 441–452. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.004

    22. Colombo, L. A., Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2019). The discourse of eco-innovation in the European Union: An analysis of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan and Horizon 2020. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150

    23. Cordova, M. F., & Celone, A. (2019). SDGs and Innovation in the Business Context Literature Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247043

    24. Crifo, P., Escrig-Olmedo, E., & Mottis, N. (2019). Corporate Governance as a Key Driver of Corporate Sustainability in France: The Role of Board Members and Investor Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1127–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3866-6

    25. Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452

    26. de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001

    27. de Oliveira, C. T., Dantas, T. E. T., & Soares, S. R. (2021). Nano and micro level circular economy indicators: Assisting decision-makers in circularity assessments. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.024

    28. Ding, L.-L., Lei, L., Wang, L., & Zhang, L.-F. (2020). Assessing industrial circular economy performance and its dynamic evolution: An extended Malmquist index based on cooperative game network DEA. Science of the Total Environment, 731. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139001

    29. Droege, H., Raggi, A., & Ramos, T. B. (2021). Co-development of a framework for circular economy assessment in organisations: Learnings from the public sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1715–1729. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2140

    30. Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female Leadership Advantage and Disadvantage: Resolving the Contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x

    31. El Chaarani, H., & Raimi, L. (2022). Diversity, entrepreneurial innovation, and performance of healthcare sector in the COVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2808

    32. Erhemjamts, O., & Huang, K. (2019). Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. Journal of Business Research, 105, 61–79. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.037

    33. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on Boards: Do They Affect Sustainability Reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1329

    34. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2015). Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Board Diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193–207. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333

    35. Fussler, C., & James, P. (1996). Driving Eco-Innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability. Null. https://doi.org/null

    36. García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L., & Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2018). Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304–317. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215

    37. Geng, Y., & Doberstein, B. (2008). Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving “leapfrog development.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.3843/SusDev.15.3:6

    38. Gerged, A. M. (2020). Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and The Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2642

    39. Ghardallou, W. (2022). Corporate Sustainability and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of CEO Education and Tenure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063513

    40. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

    41. He, J., Lei, Y., & Fu, X. (2019). Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245007

    42. Henrik Cronqvist & Frank Yu. (2017). Shaped by their daughters: Executives, female socialization, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.09.003

    43. Hizarci-Payne, A. K., İpek, İ., & Gumus, G. K. (2020). How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta-analytic review. Business Strategy and The Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2678

    44. Huang, S. K. (2013). The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1295

    45. Ismail, A. M., Ahmadi, S. M., Yatim, N., & Ismail, P. M. (2020). The impact of board characteristics on co-operative reputation from the lense of resource-based view theory (RBVT). International Journal of Financial Research, 11(3), 43–61. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n3p43

    46. Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, C. J. C., Seuring, S., Jabbour, A. B. L. de S., Jabbour, A. B. L. de S., Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. de C., Fiorini, P. de C., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020). Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416

    47. Jaeger-Erben, M., Jensen, C., Hofmann, F., & Zwiers, J. (2021). There is no sustainable circular economy without a circular society. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105476

    48. Jahid, M. A., Rashid, M. H. U., Masud, M. A. K., & Yaya, R. (2022). A longitudinal study of corporate social responsibility expenditure and ownership structure of financial firms. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(1), 24–37. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.03

    49. Jakhar, S. K., Bhattacharya, A., Rathore, H., & Mangla, S. K. (2020). Stakeholder pressure for sustainability: Can ‘innovative capabilities’ explain the idiosyncratic response in the manufacturing firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2635–2653. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2526

    50. Johennesse, L.-A. C., & Budidarma, I. G. A. M. B. (2022). Corporate Governance and R&D Strategic Decision Making. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i3.150

    51. Kabir, R., & Thai, H. M. (2021). Key factors determining corporate social responsibility practices of Vietnamese firms and the joint effects of foreign ownership. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 59. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2020.100676

    52. Khan, M. K., Ali, S., Zahid, R. M. A., Huo, C., & Nazir, M. S. (2022). Does Whipping Tournament Incentives Spur CSR Performance? An Empirical Evidence From Chinese Sub-national Institutional Contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841163

    53. Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Johl, S. K. (2019). Nexus of Comprehensive Green Innovation, Environmental Management System-14001-2015 and Firm Performance. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1691833

    54. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

    55. Lai, Y., & Sohail, M. T. (2022). Revealing the Effects of Corporate Governance on Green Investment and Innovation: Do Law and Policy Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961122

    56. Li, Q., & Shi, P. (2010). CEO characteristics, the independence of board of directors and the company innovation performance (2 citation(s)). 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment, ICEEE2010. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2010.5660490

    57. Linder, M., Linder, M., Sarasini, S., & Loon, P. van. (2017). A Metric for Quantifying Product‐Level Circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12552

    58. Malik, F., Wang, F., Naseem, M. A., Ikram, A., & Ali, S. (2020). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Related to CEO Attributes: An Empirical Study. SAGE Open, 10(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899093

    59. Nguyen, A. H., & Nguyen, L. H. (2020). Determinants of sustainability disclosure: Empirical evidence from vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 73–84. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO6.073

    60. Nguyen, P. H., Nguyen Cao, Q. K., & Bui, L. T. (2022). Energy recovery from municipal solid waste landfill for a sustainable circular economy in Danang City, Vietnam (3 citation(s)). 964(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/964/1/012015

    61. Nilsen, H. R. (2020). The hierarchy of resource use for a sustainable circular economy. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(1), 27–40. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2019-0103

    62. Oh, W.-Y., Cha, J., & Chang, Y. K. (2017). Does Ownership Structure Matter? The Effects of Insider and Institutional Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 111–124. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2914-8

    63. P, F., & K.B, N. (2020). Determinants of CSR disclosure: An evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(1), 110–133. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-06-2018-0171

    64. Pacheco, D. A. de J., Caten, C. S. ten, Jung, C. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Navas, H. V. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2017). Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049

    65. Parrino, R., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Voting with their feet: Institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00247-7

    66. Peter John, E., & Mishra, U. (2023). Sustainable circular economy production system with emission control in LED bulb companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(21), 59963–59990. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26243-7

    67. Peyravi, B., & Jakubavičius, A. (2022). Drivers in the Eco-Innovation Road to the Circular Economy: Organiational Capabilities and Exploitative Strategies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710748

    68. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & López-Zamora, B. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies of Spanish Listed Firms and Controlling Shareholders’ Representatives. Organization and Environment, 31(4), 339–359. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722147

    69. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3

    70. Ronald K. Mitchell, Ronald K. Mitchell, Gary R. Weaver, Bradley R. Agle, Adam D. Bailey, & James Carlson. (2016). Stakeholder Agency and Social Welfare: Pluralism and Decision Making in the Multi-Objective Corporation. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0486

    71. Roos Lindgreen, E., Salomone, R., & Reyes, T. (2020). A Critical Review of Academic Approaches, Methods and Tools to Assess Circular Economy at the Micro Level. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124973

    72. Rui, Z., & Lu, Y. (2021). Stakeholder pressure, corporate environmental ethics and green innovation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(1), 70–86. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1783563

    73. Sacco, P., Vinante, C., Borgianni, Y., & Orzes, G. (2021). Circular economy at the firm level: A new tool for assessing maturity and circularity. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095288

    74. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., & Cluzel, F. (2017). How to Assess Product Performance in the Circular Economy? Proposed Requirements for the Design of a Circularity Measurement Framework. Recycling, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling2010006

    75. Sanches, J. R., Trevisan, A. H., Seles, B. M. R. P., Castro, C. G., Piao, R. S., Rozenfeld, H., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808

    76. Sannino, G., Di Carlo, F., & Lucchese, M. (2020). CEO characteristics and sustainability business model in financial technologies firms: Primary evidence from the utilization of innovative platforms. Management Decision, 58(8), 1779–1799. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1360

    77. Sifatu, W. O., Sjahruddin, H., Fajriah, Y., Dwijendra, N. A., & Santoso, A. (2020). Innovative work behaviors in pharmacies of Indonesia: Role of employee voice, generational diversity management and employee engagement. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(2), Article 2.

    78. Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., & Avdiushchenko, A. (2017). Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(3), 669–678. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1323-8

    79. Spišáková, M., Mandičák, T., Mésároš, P., & Špak, M. (2022). Waste Management in a Sustainable Circular Economy as a Part of Design of Construction. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(9). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094553

    80. Sumarta, N. H., Prabowo, M. A., Amidjaya, P. G., Supriyono, E., & Prameswari, A. P. (2021). Ceo characteristics and environmental performance: Evidence from indonesian banks. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(2), 1015–1033. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3779.2021

    81. Tandoh, I., Duffour, K. A., Essandoh, M., & Amoako, R. N. (2022). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY: THE MODERATING ROLE OF TOP MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2022.v7i2.309

    82. Velenturf, A. P. M. (2021). A framework and baseline for the integration of a sustainable circular economy in offshore wind. Energies, 14(17). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175540

    83. Velenturf, A. P. M., & Purnell, P. (2021). Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018

    84. Wang, P., Che, F., Fan, S., & Gu, C. (2014). Ownership governance, institutional pressures and circular economy accounting information disclosure: An institutional theory and corporate governance theory perspective. Chinese Management Studies, 8(3), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-10-2013-0192

    85. Yeo, J. Y. J., How, B. S., Teng, S. Y., Leong, W. D., Ng, W. P. Q., Lim, C. H., Ngan, S. L., Sunarso, J., & Lam, H. L. (2020). Synthesis of sustainable circular economy in palm oil industry using graph-theoretic method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19), 1–29. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198081

    86. Ying, M., Shan, H., & Tikuye, G. A. (2022). How Do Stakeholder Pressures Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010443

    87. Zenchanka, S., Antsipenka, N., Busygin, D., Korshuk, E., & Sidsaph, H. (2020). Circular Economy: Can Belarus Close the Loop? Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 76(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.76.4.24433