Reflection-based whole-batch discussion (RWD) as a tool for learning proficiency enhancement at faculty of medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin in Malaysia: toward curriculum development
List of Authors
  • Marwan SA , Uday Younis Hussein Abdullah

Keyword
  • reflection, whole-batch, discussion, Learning, curriculum development

Abstract
  • Introduction: Different approaches have been endeavoured by medical educationists to produce high-standard graduates from medical school, including collaborative group discussions and reflective practice (RP) assignments. The current study aimed to evaluate the outcome of teacher-led whole batch discussion following RP tasks given to the students. The overall teaching approach is referred to as “Reflection-based whole-batch discussion (RWD)”. Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-two medical students who attended the haematology course at the University Sultan Zainal Abidin were recruited into this study over 2 academic years. The first batch of students (n=61) was unexposed to the RWD intervention (RWD-unexposed) while the second batch from the following academic year (n=61) was exposed (RWD-exposed) to the intervention. Students adhered to the guidelines given by the instructor pertaining to the reflective practice (RP) before the sessions. A weekly RWD session was conducted where the instructor-led a dually interactive forum to discuss students’ mistakes and misunderstandings as reflected within their write-ups. Exam results from both RWD-exposed and the RWD-unexposed students were compared using the student t-test. Results: The mean scores of students’ results were significantly higher among RWD-exposed students compared to RWD-unexposed students in their essay questions and objective structured practical exam questions (p<0.01). However, RWD-exposed students scored significantly lower than the RWD-unexposed student's group in multiple true and false (MTF) questions. Conclusion: Implementing RWD is a promising teaching strategy in improving the academic achievement of medical students especially in answering essay questions. MTF questions format may be an incompetent tool for evaluating the impacts of new teaching strategies and therefore medical educationists recommended efficient alternative assessment tools such as OBA and EMQ for the sake of curriculum development in medical institutes.

Reference
  • 1.Allen D & Tanner K. Infusing Active Learning into the Large-enrollment Biology Class: Seven Strategies, from the Simple to Complex. Cell Biol Educ 2005; 4: 262–8.
    2.Gibbs G. Learning in doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. 1st ed. London: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Polytechic, 1988.
    3.Bruster BG & Peterson BR. Using critical incidents in teaching to promote reflective practice, Refl Pract 2013; 14: 170-82.
    4.Cole M. Learning through reflective practice: a professional approach to effective continuing professional development among healthcare professionals, Res Post-Comp Educ 2000; 5: 23-38.
    5.Elabbar AA. National Libyan Public Education Reform: Entire Transformative Strategies, 2020-2026. American J Educ Res 2017; 5: 1044-57.
    6.Boyd EM & Fales AW. Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. J Human Psychol 1983; 23: 99-117.
    7.Tashiro J, Shimpuku Y, Naruse K, Maftuhah, Matsutani M. Concept analysis of reflection in nursing professional development. Japan J Nurs Scie 2013; 10: 170–9
    8.Helyer R. Learning through reflection: the critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL). J Work-Applied Manag. 2015; 7: 15-27.
    9.Smith S, Martin JH. Practitioner capability: supporting critical reflection during workbased placement – a pilot study. Higher Educ Skills Work-Based Learn 2014; 4: 284-300.
    10.Le H, Janssen J, Wubbels T. Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration, Camb J Educ 2018; 48: 103-22.
    11.Mustafa C & Nurcan C. Students’ talk during collaborative group discussion. The Eurasia Proc Educ Soc Scie 2014; 1: 307-10.
    12.Sumera A. Large group teaching, an effective and efficient teaching methodology. J Asian Scie Res 2014; 4: 1-5.
    13.Abdullah UYH, Jassim HM, Abdul Rahman NI, et al. Assessment of First-Year Students’ Metacognitive Ability in Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin: Toward Curriculum Development. Educ Med J 2017; 9: 17–28.
    14.Amiryousefi M & Ketabi S. Mnemonic instruction: A way to boost vocabulary learning and recall. J Lang Teach Res 2011; 2: 178-82.
    15.Campos A, Camino E, Perez-Fabello MJ. Using the keyword mnemonics method among adult learners. Educ Geront 2011; 37: 327-35.
    16.Hunt N. Using mnemonics in teaching statistics. Teach Stat 2010; 32: 73-5.
    17.Qureshi A, Rizvi F, Syed A, Shahid A, Manzoor H. The method of loci as a mnemonic device to facilitate learning in endocrinology leads to improvement in student performance as measured by assessments. Advances in Physiology Education. 2014; 38: 140-4.
    18.Wolgemuth JR, Cobb RB, Alwell M. The effects of mnemonic interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Learn Disab Res Prac 2008; 23: 1-10.
    19.Chandratilake M, Davis M, Ponnamperuma G. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions. Natl Med J India. 2011; 24: 225-8.
    20.Cox E. Adult learners learning from experience: using a reflective practice model to support work-based learning. Reflec Prac 2005; 6: 459-72.
    21.William T, Branch Jr, George M. Reflection-Based Learning for Professional Ethical Formation. AMA J Ethics 2017; 19: 349-56.
    22.Banoobhai M. Critical reflection: tools for curriculum implementation and innovation. Soc Behav Scie 2012; 47: 175-9.
    23.Wagner MJ, Fischer MR, Scaglione M, et al. GMS Journal for Medical Education 2017; 34:1-31.