Pemikiran komputasi guru matematik: Satu tinjauan sistematik
List of Authors
  • Nor Amalina Abd Aziz , Roslinda Rosli

Keyword
  • perkembangan, penambahbaikkan, pemikiran komputasi, guru, pendidik, matematik

Abstract
  • Kemahiran pemikiran komputasi penting dan menjadi keutamaan kepada hampir semua peluang pekerjaan pada masa hadapan. Pemikiran komputasi merupakan satu proses pemikiran yang disusun untuk merumus dan menyelesaikan masalah, yang mana penyelesaiannya akan diwakilkan dalam satu bentuk tertentu oleh alat pemprosesan maklumat. Namun ia masih baru dalam bidang pendidikan terutamanya di Malaysia dan masih ramai pendidik tidak menyedari akan kepentingannya. Kajian sistematik ini dijalankan bagi membuat tinjauan dan menganalisis secara kritikal dan sintesis mengenai kaedah-kaedah yang digunakan dalam menerapkan pemikiran komputasi guru Matematik dan pelaksanaan pemikiran komputasi yang digunakan guru dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik. Pangkalan data Scopus dan Web of Sciences (WoS) digunakan dalam pencarian artikel berkaitan dalam tempoh masa 6 tahun kebelakang bermula dari tahun 2016 sehingga 2021. Sebanyak 103 artikel ditemukan berdasarkan kata kunci yang ditentukan pengkaji dan 20 artikel telah dipilih sebagai sampel bagi kajian sistematik ini. Proses pemilihan artikel adalah berdasarkan proses carta alir PRISMA. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan pelbagai kaedah yang ditemukan dalam menerapkan pemikiran komputasi dalam Matematik; antaranya ialah bengkel, kursus berterusan, reka bentuk model pembelajaran, bimbingan pengajaran, bantuan pakar teknologi, penyedian bahan pengajaran dan aktiviti serta kesedaran guru. Pelaksanaan pemikiran komputasi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik yang dikenal pasti dijalankan dalam kajian adalah dengan menggunakan sistem komputer (plugged), tanpa komputer (unplugged) dan gabungan kedua-duanya iaitu dengan sistem komputer (plugged) dan tanpa sistem komputer (unplugged).

Reference
  • 1. Abdullah, A. H., Othman, M. A., Ismail, N., Rahman, S. N. S. A., Mokhtar, M., & Zaid, N. M. (2019). Development of mobile application for the concept of pattern recognition in computational thinking for mathematics subject. TALE 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225910

    2. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

    3. Barana, A., Conte, A., Fissore, C., Floris, F., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2020). The creation of animated graphs to develop computational thinking and support STEM education. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1125 CCIS(January), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41258-6_14

    4. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (M. Steele (ed.); 2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    5. Bouck, E. C., & Yadav, A. (2020). Providing access and opportunity for computational thinking and computer science to support mathematics for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1(10), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420978564

    6. Bråting, K., & Kilhamn, C. (2020). Exploring the intersection of algebraic and computational thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1779012

    7. Città, G., Gentile, M., Allegra, M., Arrigo, M., Conti, D., Ottaviano, S., Reale, F., & Sciortino, M. (2019). The effects of mental rotation on computational thinking. Computers and Education, 141(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103613

    8. Columba, L. (2020). Computational thinking using the first in math ® online program. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(1), 45–57.

    9. DiSessa, A. A. (2018). Computational literacy and “The Big Picture” concerning computers in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1403544

    10. Günbatar, M. S., & Bakırcı, H. (2019). STEM teaching intention and computational thinking skills of pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1615–1629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9849-5

    11. Humble, N., Mozelius, P., & Lisa, S. (2020). Remaking and reinforcing mathematics and technology with programming – teacher perceptions of challenges , opportunities and tools in K-12 settings. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0021

    12. Hynes, M. M., Cardella, M. E., Moore, T. J., Brophy, S. P., Purzer, S., Tank, K. M., Menekse, M., Yeter, I. H., & Ehsan, H. (2019). Inspiring young children to engage in computational thinking in and out of school (research to practice). ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32970

    13. Israel, M., & Lash, T. (2020). From classroom lessons to exploratory learning progressions: mathematics + computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674879

    14. Jagušt, T., Krzic, A. S., Gledec, G., Grgić, M., & Bojic, I. (2018). Exploring Different Unplugged Game-like Activities for Teaching Computational Thinking. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), October, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659077

    15. Lavigne, H. J., Lewis-Presser, A., & Rosenfeld, D. (2020). An exploratory approach for investigating the integration of computational thinking and mathematics for preschool children. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1693940

    16. Lee, I., Grover, S., Martin, F., Pillai, S., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09803-w

    17. Lee, I., Lee, I., & Malyn-smith, J. (2019). Computational Thinking Integration Patterns Along the Framework Defining Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective.

    18. Lee, I., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2020). Computational thinking integration patterns along the framework defining computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09802-x

    19. Majumder, S., Khaloozadeh, K., Czerniak, C. M., Oluoch, J., Shockey, T., Javaid, A., Mentzer, G., Ducket, R., & Ponnaiyan, T. (2020). A study of common concerns inhibiting teacher enactment of computational thinking into project-based mathematics and career technical education. Proceedings Ofthe 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2020), 1(Csedu), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009337403410349

    20. Masfingatin, T., & Maharani, S. (2019). Computational thinking: Students on proving geometry theorem. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 2216–2223.

    21. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Evaluating a course for teaching introductory programming with scratch to pre-service kindergarten teachers. Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(3), 231–246.

    22. Reichert, J. T., Couto Barone, D. A., & Kist, M. (2020). Computational thinking in K-12: An analysis with mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7832

    23. Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Larimore, R. A. (2020). Teacher implementation profiles for integrating computational thinking into elementary mathematics and science instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3161–3188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10115-5

    24. Théry-Schultz, J. (2018). Les enjeux de la clarification des règles. Concurrences, 2018(3), 22–24.

    25. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

    26. Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & Mclean, T. (2017). Computational Thinking in Teacher Education. In: Rich P., Hodges C. (eds) Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. In Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1

    27. Yusoff, K. M., Ashaari, N. S., Siti, T., Tengku, M., & Ali, N. M. (2020). Analysis on the requirements of computational thinking skills to overcome the difficulties in learning programming. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(3), 244–253.