Analisis kandungan topik tambah dan tolak dalam buku teks Matematik Tahap 1 sekolah kebangsaan
List of Authors
  • Nur Afiqah Azhar , Roslinda Rosli

Keyword
  • buku teks Matematik, kandungan, model LESH, Pentaksiran, Tahap Penguasaan

Abstract
  • Buku teks adalah bahan sumber yang penting semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik. Guru sentiasa menggunakan buku teks sebagai rujukan utama untuk memastikan kandungan pengajaran yang disampaikan tidak tersasar daripada garis panduan silibus yang disediakan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). Oleh itu, kajian ini menganalisis dokumen kurikulum sebagai sampel kajian iaitu Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 1, Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 2, Buku Teks Matematik Tahun 3 dan Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (DSKP) Tahun 1, 2 dan 3. Analisis secara deskriptif melalui aplikasi SPSS telah dijalankan. Hasil dapatan kajian mendapati kandungan topik tambah dan tolak adalah berkesinambungan dengan skor berdasarkan Rubrik Kesinambungan Kemahiran Topik Tambah dan Tolak Berdasarkan DSKP. Manakala keseluruhan perwakilan dalam Model LESH didapati terkandung dalam ketiga-tiga persembahan dalam buku teks tersebut. Ujian Khi Kuasa Dua dengan alternatif Ujian Ketepatan Fisher (Fisher’s Exact Test) mendapati bahawa tidak terdapat hubungan antara standard kandungan dengan tahap penguasaan dalam soalan penilaian dalam ketiga-tiga buah buku teks tetapi terdapat perkaitan yang jelas antara kandungan penilaian mengikut tahun dengan tahap penguasaan berdasarkan DSKP. Implikasi kajian ini penting untuk menyediakan guru, murid dan ibu bapa dalam menggunakan buku teks Matematik secara optimum dari aspek perancangan, pembacaan dan panduan dalam sesi pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

Reference
  • 1. Adu, KO., Mathwasa, J&aDU & EO. 2020. Textbook Utilisation in Teaching Mathematics in Selected Mathematics in Selected Primary School Primary Schools in East London Education. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 17(2): 156–170.

    2. Alkhateeb, M. 2018. Multiple Representations in 8th Grade Mathematics Textbook and the Extent to which Teachers Implement Them. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 14(1): 137–145. doi:10.12973/iejme/3982

    3. Alsawaie, O. N. 2012. Number Sense-Based Strategies Used By High-Achieving Sixth Grade Students Who Experienced Reform Textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10(5): 1071–1097.

    4. Asyrani Abdul Samat & Roslinda Rosli. 2020. Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of Primary School Mathematics Textbook. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 9(1286–300).

    5. Atasoy, E. & Baki, A. 2020. Investigation of students’ cognitive learning in mathematics lessons supported with writing activities. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, hlm. Vol. 11. doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.703648

    6. Azevedo, F. S. & Mann, M. J. 2019. The Mathematics in the Social Studies Textbook: A Critical Content Analysis and Implications for Students’ Reasoning. Creative Education 10(01): 1–25.

    7. Behnke, Y. 2018. Textbook Effects and Efficacy. The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies 383–398. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1

    8. Bingolbali, E. 2020. An analysis of questions with multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes in mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 51(5): 669–687. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2019.1606949

    9. Brookhart, S. M. 2018. Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics. Frontiers in Education 3(April). doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00022

    10. Cherry, K. 2019. Jean Piaget: Life and Theory of Cognitive Development. https://www.verywellmind.com/jean-piaget-biography-1896-1980-2795549 [19 December 2019].

    11. Chunxia Qi, Zhang, X. & Huang, D. 2014. Research On Textbooks Used In China For Teaching Geometric Transformations In Secondary School: From The Perspective Of The Teachers’ Role. International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) 29-31 July 2014, University of Southampton, UK, hlm. 91–103.

    12. Dahlan, J. A. & Juandi, D. 2011. Analisis Representasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematika Kontekstual. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam 16(1): 128. doi:10.18269/jpmipa.v16i1.273

    13. Divrik, R., Mentiş Taş, A. & Pilten, P. 2020. Teachers’ Views on the Problem-Solving & Problem-Posing Tasks in Primary School Mathematics Textbooks. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 9(1): 73. doi:10.5430/jct.v9n1p73

    14. Erbaş, A. K., Alacaci, C. & Bulut, M. 2012. A comparison of mathematics textbooks from Turkey, Singapore, and the United States of America. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12(3): 2324–2330.

    15. Fan, L., Zhu, Y. & Miao, Z. 2013. Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education 45(5): 633–646.

    16. Glasnovic Gracin, D. 2018. Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 49(7): 1003–1024.

    17. Ismajli, H. & Neziri, M. 2019. Analyzing languages and communication textbooks in the context of achieving competence: Student as a critical thinker. International Journal of Instruction 12(4): 251–266. doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12416a

    18. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2012. Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan, hlm. Edisi Ke-3.

    19. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2013. Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education, hlm. Vol. 27, 1–268.

    20. Kuldas, S., Sinnakaudan, S., Hashim, S. & Ghazali, M. 2017. Calling for the development of children’s number sense in primary schools in Malaysia. Education 3-13 45(5): 586–598.

    21. McLeod, S. 2018. Jean Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Simply Psychology (1936): 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/simplypsychology.org-Jean-Piaget.pdf

    22. Nagnedrarao, B. 2017. Mathematics Teachers ’ Perception Using Textbook To Promote 29(4): 965–970.

    23. Noraini Idris. 2013. Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan by Noraini Idris, hlm. Kedua.

    24. Pohl, M. & Schacht, F. 2019. How Do Students Use Digital Textbooks? Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (pp. 39–44). Paderborn: Universitätsbibliothek Paderborn, hlm. 39–44.

    25. Randahl, M. 2016. The mathematics textbook at tertiary level as curriculum material – exploring the teacher’s decision-making process. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 47(6): 897–916. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1133853

    26. Rezat, S. 2013. The textbook-in-use: Students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM - Mathematics Education 45(5): 659–670.

    27. Rezat, S., Fan, L., Hattermann, M., Schumacher, J. & Wuschke, H. 2019. 50 Years of realistic mathematics education ideas and their implementation in textbooks- leaarning facilitators for addition and subtraction. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development., hlm. 341–347. doi:10.17619/UNIPB/1-768

    28. Schubring, G. & Fan, L. 2018. Recent advances in mathematics textbook research and development: an overview. ZDM - Mathematics Education 50(5): 765–771.

    29. Shield, M. & Dole, S. 2013. Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning 183–199.

    30. Sievert, H., van den Ham, A. K., Niedermeyer, I. & Heinze, A. 2019. Effects of mathematics textbooks on the development of primary school children’s adaptive expertise in arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences 74(January): 101716. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.006

    31. Singh, P., Yusoff, N. M. & Hoon, T. S. 2020. Content analysis of primary school mathematics textbooks and its relationship with pupils achievement. Asian Journal of University Education 16(2): 15–25. doi:10.24191/AJUE.V16I2.10286

    32. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C. & Groff, C. 2009. Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 79(2): 839–911. doi:10.3102/0034654308330968

    33. Sumarmo, U., Suharyati, S. & Maya, R. 2019. the Role of Model-Eliciting Activities on Student’S Mathematical Reasoning and Self Regulated Learning. Edusentris 5(2): 61. doi:10.17509/edusentris.v5i2.294

    34. Sun, X. H. 2019. Bridging whole numbers and fractions: problem variations in Chinese mathematics textbook examples. ZDM - Mathematics Education 51(1): 109–123. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-01013-9

    35. Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z. & Abidin, M. 2018. A comparative analysis on cognitive domain for the Malaysian primary four textbook series. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(4): 1273–1286.

    36. Thompson, D. R. & Senk, S. L. 2014. Lessons Learned From Three Decades Of Textbook Research. International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) 29-31 July 2014, University of Southampton, UK, hlm. 49–56.

    37. van den Ham, A. K. & Heinze, A. 2018. Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation 59(July): 133–140. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005

    38. Wiliam, D. 2013. Assessment : The Bridge between. Voices from the Middle 21(2): 40.

    39. Zhang, F. & Zhu, X. 2014. Mathematics Textbook Research And Development For The Promotion Of Independent Learning And Inquiry Learning. International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development 2014 (ICMT-2014) 29-31 July 2014, University of Southampton, UK, hlm. 511–516.

    40. Zhu, Y. & Fan, L. 2006. Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4(4): 609–626.