A theoretical framework for sustainability initiatives from the lens of stakeholder theory and institutional theory
List of Authors
  • Azlina Abdul Aziz , Fathilatul Zakimi Abdul Hamid

Keyword
  • sustainability initiatives; stakeholder theory; institutional theory; motives; sustainability

Abstract
  • This paper proposes a theoretical framework that synthesises two theories in explaining business sustainability initiatives. The relevant theories are stakeholder theory and institutional theory that are commonly employed in the corporate social responsibility and sustainability literature. The similarities and interrelatedness of these two theories are contended as complementing instead of competing. In fact, they are relevant to be linked to sustainability initiatives in explaining the motivation of such effort from the perspective of these theories. Moving forward, this framework can be employed as a theoretical foundation for empirical studies to obtain better prediction on the motives and reasons of sustainability initiatives from different contexts. Also, it will be employed to gauge the relevance of these theories in explaining the engagement of business in such initiatives.

Reference
  • 1. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210418905

    2. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002

    3. Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12030760

    4. Ball, A., & Craig, R. (2010). Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.11.006

    5. Bansal, P. (2005a). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441

    6. Bansal, P. (2005b). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441

    7. Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108

    8. Bomann-Larsen, L., & Wiggen, O. (2004). Responsibility in World Business. United Nations University Press, 1–14.

    9. Brunton, M., Eweje, G., & Taskin, N. (2017). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk? Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1889

    10. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684

    11. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816

    12. Clarkson, M. . . . E. (1995). A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK AND EVALUATING FOR ANALYZING. The Academy of Management Review.

    13. Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00031

    14. Deegan, C., & Shelly, M. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibilities: Alternative Perspectives About the Need to Legislate. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1730-2

    15. Deegan, M. A. (2006). Defining the Policy Space for Disaster Management: A System Dynamics Approach to U.S. Flood Policy Analysis. New York.

    16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1

    17. Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D. (2022). Economic Theories and Sustainable Development. A Guide to Sustainable Corporate Responsibility, 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88203-7_3

    18. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2014). Making the Business Case for Sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2003(9), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.4700.2003. sp.00009

    19. Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective - a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.729

    20. Freeman. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective. Pitman: Boston, MA.

    21. Freeman, E. R., & Evan, W. M. (1979). A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. Ethical Theory and Business.

    22. Freeman, Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066

    23. Gallagher, V. C., Hrivnak, M. W., Valcea, S., Mahoney, C. B., & LaWong, D. (2018). A comprehensive three-dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’ of ‘people’ – a vital stakeholder in sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1493

    24. Garvare, R., & Johansson, P. (2010). Management for sustainability - a stakeholder theory. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21(7), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.483095

    25. Gray, R. (2006). Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time? In Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788. 2006.9730048

    26. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009. 04.006

    27. Gray, R., Adams, C., & Owen, D. (1996). Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges. Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting.

    28. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996

    29. Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Tilt, C. (2020). Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118989

    30. Hamad, S., Draz, M. U., & Lai, F. W. (2020). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Sustainability Reporting on Integrated Reporting: A Conceptual Framework. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927431

    31. Hamid, F. Z. A., & Othman, Z. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility by Malaysian and Singapore Sustainable Index Companies. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v9i2.14665

    32. Hirsch, P. M. (2012). Organizational ness and the Institutional Environment. Science, 20(3), 327–344. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2391994.pdf?refreqid=excelsior: b72c458196048a116c7f06dadfed1869

    33. Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework. Organization and Environment, 27(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1086026614535786

    34. Jaegler, A., & Sarkis, J. (2014). The theory and practice of sustainable supply chains. Supply Chain Forum, 15(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2014.11517329

    35. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112

    36. Javeed, A., Yar Khan, M., Rehman, M., Khurshid, A., & Hashmani, M. A. (2020). Tracking Sustainable Development Goals-A Case Study of Pakistan, (February). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202002.0201.v1

    37. Johari, N. H. B., Azmi, N. K. N. B. N., Athzaha, N. N. B. M., Manaf, N. H. B. A., & Ibrahim, T. N. B. T. (2018). The Influence of Stakeholders’ Power towards the Quality of Environmental Disclosure: A Study of Top 100 Malaysian Companies. Global Business & Management Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 206–216. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=133618115&site=eds-live&scope=site

    38. Khan, H. Z., Bose, S., & Johns, R. (2019). Regulatory influences on CSR practices within banks in an emerging economy: Do banks merely comply? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, (xxxx), 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102096

    39. Khan, M., Lockhart, J. C., & Bathurst, R. J. (2018). Institutional impacts on corporate social responsibility: a comparative analysis of New Zealand and Pakistan. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0026-3

    40. Kilbourne, W. E. (2004). Sustainable communication and the dominant social paradigm: Can they be integrated? Marketing Theory, 4(3), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1470593104045536

    41. Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Combinations for Sustainability : A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Korean Firms.

    42. KPMG. (2017). The Road Ahead - The KMPG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. KPMG.

    43. Landrum, N. E., & Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989

    44. Lawrence, A., Weber, J., & Post, J. (2011). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. In Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. 13th International Edition McGraw Hill.

    45. Lawrence, S. F. stewart. (2011). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and intitutional work, (February 2018), 149–178.

    46. López-Arceiz, F. J., Del Río, C., & Bellostas, A. J. (2020). Sustainability performance indicators: Definition, interaction, and influence of contextual characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2615–2630. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1986

    47. Lu, J. Y., & Castka, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Malaysia -experts’ views and perspectives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.184

    48. Masud, M. A. K., Hossain, M. S., & Kim, J. D. (2018). Is green regulation effective or a failure: Comparative analysis between Bangladesh Bank (BB) green guidelines and global reporting initiative guidelines. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041267

    49. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020). Reflections on the 2018 decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0348

    50. Mebratu, D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5

    51. MIA-ACCA. (2017). MIA-ACCA Integrated Reporting Survey Contents, 1–40. Retrieved from www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_National/my/dis/MIA-ACCA-IR-survey-report_2016.pdf

    52. Molla, M. S., Ibrahim, Y., & Ishak, Z. (2019). Corporate Sustainability Practices : A Review on the Measurements, Measurements, Relevant Problems and a Proposition. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: D Accounting and Auditing, 19(1), 0–8.

    53. Momin, M., & Shaoul, J. (2004). A stakeholder analysis of market-based economic policies: The case of the fertilizer industry in Bangladesh. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economics, 2004, 407–441. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/cbdv.200490137/abstract

    54. Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016). A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104

    55. Nazri, M. A., Omar, N. A., Aman, A., Ayob, A. H., & Ramli, N. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and business performance in Takaful agencies: The moderating role of objective environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208291

    56. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economics Performance. Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, 57(3), 718–721. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00220 50700019112

    57. Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2410

    58. Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & Colle, S. De. (2010). The Academy of Management Annals Stakeholder Theory : The State of the Art, (May 2013), 403–445.

    59. Persson, K., & Vingren, T. (2017). Factors affecting the sustainability disclosures in Swedish State-Owned Enterprises as hybrid organizations. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1115164/FULLTEXT01.pdf

    60. Pucci, T., Casprini, E., Galati, A., & Zanni, L. (2018). The virtuous cycle of stakeholder engagement in developing a sustainability culture: Salcheto winery. Journal of Business Research, (March), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.009

    61. Schembera, S. (2018). Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Insights on the Impact of the UN Global Compact on Its Business Participants. Business and Society (Vol. 57). https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316635579

    62. Sen, S. K., & Swierczek, F. W. (2007). Societal, Environmental and Stakeholder Value Drivers. Journal of Human Values, 13(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168580 701300205

    63. Shabana, K. M., Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2017). The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Business and Society, 56(8), 1107–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316628177

    64. Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. In Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247

    65. Van Zanten, J. A., & Van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3–4), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0008-x

    66. Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2016). On addressing the dual and embedded nature of business and the route towards corporate sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.132

    67. Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M., & Moon, J. (2015). How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

    68. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279099

    69. Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302238775

    70. Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate sustainability : What is it and where does it come from? Ivey Business Journal.

    71. Wood, D. J. (1991). Revisited Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review.