1. Adam, M., Al-Sharaa, A., Ab Ghafar, N., Mundher, R., Abu Bakar, S., & Alhasan, A. (2022). The Effects of Colour Content and Cumulative Area of Outdoor Advertisement Billboards on the Visual Quality of Urban Streets. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(12), 630.
2. Adiastuty, N., Waluya, S. B., & Aminah, N. (2020, August). Neuroscience study: Gender and mathematical creative thinking skills in vocational high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1613, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing.
3. Ahmed, S., Muhammad, I. B., Abdulraman, M. E., & Adebisi, G. O. (2022). Visual Accessibility and Inclusive Wayfinding Design in Hospital Environment in Nigeria.
4. Appleyard, D., Gerson M S., Lintell, M. (1981). Livable Streets. University of California Press, London.
5. Arthur, P., & Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: people, signs, and architecture.
6. Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020). The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities, 101, 102687.
7. Ashihara, Y. (1983). The Aesthetic Townscape. MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Belaroussi, R., Pazzini, M., Issa, I., Dionisio, C., Lantieri, C., González, E. D., ... & Adelé, S. (2023). Assessing the Future Streetscape of Rimini Harbor Docks with Virtual Reality. Sustainability, 15(6), 5547.
9. Benita, F., & Tunçer, B. (2019). Exploring the effect of urban features and immediate environment on body responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43, 126365.
10. Bian, W., Li, J., Zhao, R., Wu, X., & Wu, W. (2022). Establishment and Saliency Verification of a Visual Translation Method for Cultural Elements of High-Speed Railways: A Case Study of the BZ Railway Line. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8520.
11. Bremer, W. F., Chitturi, M. V., Song, Y., Claros, B. R., Bill, A. R., & Noyce, D. A. (2019). Design Standards for Unobstructed Sight Lines at Left-turn Lanes (No. MN/RC 2019-32). Minnesota. Department of Transportation.
12. Caduff, D., & Timpf, S. (2008). On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cognitive Process, 9(4), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2
13. Cambra, P., & Moura, F. (2020). How does walkability change relate to walking behavior change? Effects of a street improvement in pedestrian volumes and walking experience. Journal of Transport & Health, 16, 100797.
14. Chen, H., Suhr, A., Misra, D., Snavely, N., & Artzi, Y. (2019). Touchdown: Natural language navigation and spatial reasoning in visual street environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 12538-12547).
15. Cullen, G. (1961). The Concise Townscape. Oxford: Architectural Press.
16. De Wolfe, I. (1963). The Italian townscape. London: Architectural Press.
17. Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban studies, 57(1), 93-108.
18. Fernandes, H., Costa, P., Filipe, V., Paredes, H., & Barroso, J. (2019). A review of assistive spatial orientation and navigation technologies for the visually impaired. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 155-168.
19. Filipan, K., De Coensel, B., Aumond, P., Can, A., Lavandier, C., & Botteldooren, D. (2019). Auditory sensory saliency as a better predictor of change than sound amplitude in pleasantness assessment of reproduced urban soundscapes. Building and Environment, 148, 730-741.
20. Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P. J., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., & Ramos, R. A. (2022). Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(7), 660-679.
21. Fouda, S., Farghaly, T., & Ayad, H. (2021). Enhancing Identity through Streetscape Composition. In CITIES 20.50–Creating Habitats for the 3rd Millennium: Smart–Sustainable–Climate Neutral. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2021, 26th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society (pp. 325-336). CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
22. Gath-Morad, M., Thrash, T., Schicker, J., Hölscher, C., Helbing, D., & Aguilar Melgar, L. E. (2021). Visibility matters during wayfinding in the vertical. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 18980.
23. Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. London: Island Press.
24. Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for People. Washington DC: Island Press.
25. Golombek, Y., & Marshall, W. (2021). High-density mobile LiDAR for measuring urban streetscape features. URBAN DESIGN International, pp. 1–15.
26. Götze, J., & Boye, J. (2016). Learning landmark salience models from users' route instructions. Journal of Location-Based Services, 10(1), 47-63.
27. Hapsari, T. D., Setijanti, P., & Dinapradipta, A. (2022). “Landmark-to-Landmark”: Exploring Wayfinding Aspect Criteria for the Campus.
28. Heft, H. (1979). The role of environmental features in route-learning: Two exploratory studies of wayfinding. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 172–185. doi:10.1007/BF01142591
29. Heft, H. (1983). Way-finding as the perception of information over time. Population & Environment, 6, 133–150. doi:10.1007/BF01258956
30. Heft, H. (1996). The ecological approach to navigation: A Gibsonian perspective. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 105–132). Dordrect, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
31. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Heft, H. (2010). Affordances and the perception of landscape: An inquiry into environmental perception and aesthetics. In C. W. Thompson, P. Aspinall, & S. Bell (Eds.), Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health (pp. 9–32). London, England: Routledge.
33. Heft, H. (2011). E. B. Holt’s concept of the recession of the stimulus and the emergence of the “situation” in psychology. In E. P. Charles (Ed.), A new look at new realism: E. B. Holt reconsidered. Piscataway, NJ. Transactions.
34. Heft, H. (2013). Wayfinding, navigation, and environmental cognition from a naturalist's stance.
35. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. In J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson (Trans.), New York, NY: Harper & Row.
36. Higuchi, T. (1975). Keikan no kõzõ (The visual and spatial structure of landscapes). Tokyo: Gihodo Publishing.
37. Hossam, S., Hasan, A., & Al-Hagla, K. S. (2022, November). Wayfinding based Usability of Complex Buildings. In Mobility, Knowledge and Innovation Hubs in Urban and Regional Development. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2022, 27th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society (pp. 903-912). CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
38. Iftikhar, H. (2022). A design framework for synthesizing the mobile and static wayfinding information in complex environments.
39. Iftikhar, H., Shah, P., & Luximon, Y. (2021). Human wayfinding behaviour and metrics in complex environments: a systematic literature review. Architectural Science Review, 64(5), 452–463.
40. Jamshidi, S., & Pati, D. (2021). A narrative review of theories of wayfinding within the interior environment. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 14(1), 290–303.
41. Jayaraman, S. K., Robert, L. P., Yang, X. J., & Tilbury, D. M. (2021). Multimodal hybrid pedestrian: A hybrid automaton model of urban pedestrian behavior for automated driving applications. IEEE Access, 9, 27708–27722.
42. Kim, J. Y., Choi, J. K., Han, W. H., & Kim, J. H. (2021). The influence of users’ spatial familiarity on their emotional perception of space and wayfinding movement patterns. Sensors, 21(8), 2583.
43. Kim, G., Yeo, D., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2023). Simulating Urban Element Design with Pedestrian Attention: Visual Saliency as Aid for More Visible Wayfinding Design. Land, 12(2), 394.
44. Kuliga, S. F., Nelligan, B., Dalton, R. C., Marchette, S., Shelton, A. L., Carlson, L., & Hölscher, C. (2019). Exploring individual differences and building complexity in wayfinding: The case of the Seattle central library. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 622-665.
45. Kumar, A., & Sarip, A. G. (2021). Walkability and Ridership Determinants Of Residents In Transit-Oriented Development: The Case Study Of Mentari Court, Petaling Jaya. E-Proceeding, 310
46. Liao, B., van den Berg, P. E., van Wesemael, P. J., & Arentze, T. A. (2020). Empirical analysis of walkability using data from the Netherlands. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 85, 102390.
47. Ligonnière, V., Gyselinck, V., Lhuillier, S., Mostafavi, M. A., & Dommes, A. (2021). How does the visual and cognitive salience of landmarks improve construction of spatial representations in younger and older adults?. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 21(4), 320-345.
48. Liu, M. (2023). Study on Townscape as a tool for urban visual perception= (Doctoral dissertation, Politecnico di Torino).
49. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
50. Markvica, K., Richter, G., & Lenz, G. (2019). Impact of urban street lighting on road users’ perception of public space and mobility behavior. Building and environment, 154, 32-43.
51. Mazurkiewicz, B., Kattenbeck, M., & Giannopoulos, I. (2021). Navigating your way! increasing the freedom of choice during wayfinding. In 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience, 2021)-Part II. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
52. Michalsky, T. (2020). Gaining insight through a Bird’s-Eye View. In Visual Engagements (pp. 272-296). De Gruyter.
53. McGilchrist, I. (2019). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale University Press.
54. Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In: The Cambridge Handbook of visuospatial thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, New York.
55. Montello, D. R., & Sas, C. (2006). Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. In: International encyclopaedia of ergonomics and human factors, 2nd edition, pp. 2003–2008. CRC Press: Taylor and Francis, Ltd., London. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(74)90072-7
56. Moradi, Z., Najlerahim, A., Macrae, C. N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2020). Attentional saliency and ingroup biases: From society to the brain. Social Neuroscience, 15(3), 324–333.
57. Narindrasani, S., & Fuad, H. (2020). The Role of Captivation and Sensation in Pleasurable Experience to Enhance Wayfinding Process.
58. Nurlaela, S., Sugiono, N. A. I., Navastara, A. M., Umilia, E., & Koswara, A. Y. (2021). Assessment of the Perception of Security Based on Crime Prevention through Environmental Design in Bundaran HI.
59. Parush, A., Lindenfeld, I., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2022). Overall visibility might offer false affordance to indoor wayfinding: the role of global and local landmarks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 716-720). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
60. Pasalar, C., & Hallowell, G. (2020). Toward Human Centered Smart Cities: Understanding Emerging Technologies and Their Effect on the Urban Experience. In J. Bean, S. Dickinson, & A. Ida (Eds.), Critical Practices in Architecture: The Unexamined (pp. 317–339).
61. Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding in Architecture. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
62. Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Ronconi, L. (2018). Tracing a route and finding a shortcut: The working memory, motivational, and personality factors involved. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 12, 225.
63. Primeau, K. E. (2022). A GIS Approach to Landscape Scale Archaeoacoustics. State University of New York at Albany.
64. Psarras, S., Zarkali, A., & Hanna, S. (2019). Visual saliency in navigation: Modelling navigational behaviour using saliency and depth analysis. International Space Syntax Symposium.
65. Qureshi, S., Memon, I. A., & Talpur, M. A. H. (2022). Association between objectively measured neighbourhood built environment and walkability. Mehran University Research Journal Of Engineering & Technology, 41(1), 157-168.
66. Ramli, R., Yaacob, N., & Zainol, R. (2022). Walkability Assessment of First Mile Last Mile Public Transport System of Neighbourhood in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and Singapore for Persons with Disabilities: A Comparative Study. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 22(3), 1-22.
67. Rapoport, A. (1976). The mutual interaction of people and their built environment - a cross-cultural perspective. Mouton Publishers.
68. Rapoport, A. (1981). Identity and environment in house and identity. In J. S. Duncan (Ed.), House and identity. London: Groom.
69. Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. New York: Pergamon Press, Inc.
70. Sarihan, E. (2021). Visibility Model of Tangible Heritage. Visualization of the Urban Heritage Environment with Spatial Analysis Methods. Heritage, 4(3), 2163–2182.
71. Shamsuddin, N. A. A., Din, S. C., Saruwono, M., & Ahmad, M. (2022). A Review on Wayfinding Information in Complex Environment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 129-134.
72. Shamsuddin, S. (1997). Identity of Place (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Nottingham.
73. Shamsuddin, S. (2011). Townscape Revisited – Unravelling the Character at the Historic Townscape in Malaysia. Penerbit UTM Press.
74. Sharp, T. (1946). The anatomy of the village. Penguin Books.
75. Seetharaman, K., Shepley, M. M., & Cheairs, C. (2021). The saliency of geographical landmarks for community navigation: a photovoice study with persons living with dementia. Dementia, 20(4), 1191–1212.
76. Sitte, C. (1889). City Planning According to Artistic Principles. New York: Dover Publications; Translated, 1889 edition (December 15, 2006).
77. Sharma, A., & Kim, T. E. (2022). Exploring technical and non-technical competencies of navigators for autonomous shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(6), 831–849.
78. Tahalea, S., Novianti, E., & Damarjati, F. X. (2022, January). Urban Aesthetics Analysis with Townscape Theory Approach in Architecture Photography (Case Study: Jakarta Old Town Core Zone). In Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia.
79. van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Orientation and Wayfinding: Measuring Visibility. Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies, 87-111.
80. White, H., & Shah, P. (2019). Focus: Attention Science: Attention in Urban and Natural Environments. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 92(1), 115.
81. Wu, W., Zhang, M., & Ding, Y. (2020). Exploring the effect of economic and environment factors on PM2. 5 concentration: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110703.
82. Yavuz, A., Ataoğlu, N. C., & Acar, H. (2020). The Identification of The City on The Legibility and Wayfinding Concepts: A Case of Trabzon. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 4(2), 1-12.
83. Yesiltepe, D., Conroy Dalton, R., & Ozbil Torun, A. (2021). Landmarks in wayfinding: a review of the existing literature. Cognitive processing, 22, 369-410.
84. Yoshimura, Y., Takahashi, T., & Aota, M. (2022). Quantifying The Aesthetic For Streetscapes: Application Of Deep Learning To Ashihara’s Aesthetic Townscape. Psychologia, 2021-B022.
85. Zhang, J., Yu, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Uncovering Bias in Objective Mapping and Subjective Perception of Urban Building Functionality: A Machine Learning Approach to Urban Spatial Perception.
86. Zheng, J., Huang, Y., Chen, Y., Guan, L., & Liu, Q. (2022). Subjective Preference and Visual Attention to the Attributes of Ornamental Plants in Urban Green Space: An Eye-Tracking Study. Forests, 13(11), 1871.
87. Zolkefil, M. A. H. B., & Talib, N. B. A. (2018). Conservation of Malay Historical Urban Fabric: Value on Street Name in Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters