Level of social cohesion of Malaysian youths as a community of practice in a youth development program
List of Authors
  • Mohd Ibrani Shahrimin Adam Assim , Nurul Hidayu Mat Jusoh , Yasmin Yaccob

Keyword
  • Community of practice, youth, award development program, social cohesion, social learning theory

Abstract
  • This paper describes the level of social cohesion of Malaysian youths as a community of practice based on the perspective of social learning theory. Youths’ social environment was examined as the medium of interactions to measure their levels of social cohesion. . Community of practice of youths focused on the major domains of development, and their practice through active participation in a youth development program. The application of the framework of community of practice was measured to ascertain the level of social cohesion among youths in Malaysia. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches. A total of 265 respondents consist of youths who were actively participating in the Duke of Edinburgh International Award. The level of social cohesion among the youths was 63.4%.The findings indicate that the more community program conducted, the higher the level of social cohesion among youth. The parameters of social cohesion were also examined by analyzing youths’ participation and engagement in the award development program. Sustainability of youth development program in Malaysia is found to dependent on levels of youths’social cohesion.

Reference
  • 1. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
    2. Ataizi M. (2012) Communities of Practice. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_2075
    3. Arshad, M. M. Bin. (2015). Pembangunan Belia Positif Melalui Proses Pementoran Dalam Program Kepemimpinan Belia Di Malaysia. Phd Thesis UPM.
    4. Azizan, N., & Mohd Yusoff, Z. (2018). Pembentukan Jati Diri Remaja Melalui Pembelajaran Persekitaran Sosial: Analisis Menurut Perspektif Al-Quran. E-JURNAL PENYELIDIKAN DAN INOVASI, 5(August), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
    5. Baharuddin, S. A., & Yusoff, A. Y. (2014). Perpaduan, Kesepaduan, Penyatupaduan: Satu Negara, Satu Kata Akar, Tiga Konsep Keramat. Kuala Lumpur: Institusi Terjemahan dan Buku Malaysia.
    6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
    7. Blackmore, C. (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice. In Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice (Issue January 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2.
    8. Budman, S. H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Davis, M., & Merry, J. (1993). What is cohesiveness?: An Empirical Examination. Small Group Research, 24(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493242003.
    9. Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100105.
    10. Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Eys, M. A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102317200828
    11. Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M. S., Smith, B., & Sage, L. D. (2006). The influences of intrinsic motivation on execution of social behaviour within the theory of planned behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.299.
    12. Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429–1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x.
    13. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist’s Perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000082.
    14. Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129.
    15. Delhey, J., Boehnke, K., Dragolov, G., Ignácz, Z. S., Larsen, M., Lorenz, J., & Koch, M. (2018). Social cohesion and its correlates: A comparison of western and asian societies. Comparative Sociology, 17(3–4), 426–455. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341468.
    16. Della Líbera, B., & Jurberg, C. (2020). Communities of practice on WhatsApp: A tool for promoting citizenship among students with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 38(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619874836.
    17. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2019). Department of Statistics Malaysia Press Release: Current Population Estimates, Malaysia, 2018-2019. Department of Statistics Malaysia, July, 2018–2019.
    18. Deutsch, N. L., & Theodorou, E. (2010). Aspiring, consuming, becoming: Youth identity in a culture of consumption. Youth and Society, 42(2), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09351279.
    19. Dobson, M. C., & Gaunt, H. F. (2015). Musical and social communication in expert orchestral performance. Psychology of Music, 43(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613491998.
    20. Estabrooks, P. A., & Carron, A. V. (2000). The Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of cohesion in exercise classes. Group Dynamics, 4(3), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.3.230.
    21. Eys, M. A., & Brawley, L. R. (2018). Reflections on cohesion research with sport and exercise groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12379.
    22. Eys, M., Loughead, T., Bray, S. R., & Carron, A. V. (2009). Development of a cohesion questionnaire for youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.390.
    23. Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of Practice as a Social Theory of Learning: A Conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799.
    24. Festinger, L., Back, K. W., & Schachter, S. (1963). Social Pressures in Formal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford University Press.
    25. Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation, 32(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480.
    26. Grant, S., Maass, S., Vettern, R., Harrington, R., O’Neil, K., McGlaughlin, P., & Good, T. (2020). The Impact of Volunteering: A Multi-State Study of 4-H Youth Development Volunteers. Journal of Youth Development, 15(4), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2020.870.
    27. Hart, A., Davies, C., Aumann, K., Wenger, E., Aranda, K., Heaver, B., & Wolff, D. (2013). Mobilising knowledge in community-university partnerships: What does a community of practice approach contribute? Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.767470.
    28. Hedayati Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., Razak, N. A., & Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J. (2014). Examining social cohesion and victimization in a Malaysian multiethnic neighborhood. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 42(4), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.03.001.
    29. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398.
    30. Kalam, H. B. A. (2016). Pengaruh Persekitaran Sosial Terhadap Tingkah Laku Disiplin Murid Sekolah Rendah di Klang, Selangor Malaysia. Haseena Banu Abdul Kalam.
    31. Kanesarajah, J., Waller, M., Zheng, W. Y., & Dobson, A. J. (2016). Unit cohesion, traumatic exposure and mental health of military personnel. Occupational Medicine, 66(4), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw009.
    32. Kleinert, J., Ohlert, J., Carron, B., Eys, M., Feltz, D., Harwood, C., Linz, L., Seiler, R., & Sulprizio, M. (2012). Group dynamics in sports: An overview and recommendations on diagnostic and intervention. Sport Psychologist, 26(3), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.26.3.412.
    33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355.006.
    34. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
    35. Markus, Andrew and Kirpitchenko, Liudmila 2007, The conditions for social cohesion. In Jupp, James, Nieuwenhuysen, John and Dawson, Emma (ed), Social cohesion in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Vic., pp.21-33.
    36. McGuire, A. C. L., Kanesarajah, J., Runge, C. E., Ireland, R., Waller, M., & Dobson, A. J. (2016). Effect of multiple deployments on military families: A cross-sectional study of health and well-being of partners and children. Military Medicine, 181(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00310.
    37. Ministry of Youth and Sports. (2015). Malaysian Youth Policy. In Book (Vol. 51, Issue 1).
    38. Morley, D. (2016). Applying Wenger’s communities of practice theory to placement learning. Nurse Education Today, 39, 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.007.
    39. Mullen, B., & Suls, J. (1982). The effectiveness of attention and rejection as coping styles: A meta-analysis of temporal differences. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(82)90061-7.
    40. Pasupathi, M. (1999). Age differences in response to conformity pressure for emotional and nonemotional material. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.170.
    41. Pasupathi, M., & Weeks, T. L. (2011). Integrating self and experience in narrative as a route to adolescent identity construction. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(131), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.287.
    42. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 johan skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x.
    43. Sahharon, H. (2016). Universiti Putra Malaysia (Vol. 768). http://www.upm.edu.my/about_us/OurLoc?LANG=en.
    44. Shamsul, A. B., & Athi, S. M. (2014). Ethnicity and identity formation: Colonial knowledge, colonial structures and transition. Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia, May, 267–278.
    45. Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2009). Collaborative knowledge building process: An activity theory analysis. Vine, 39(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720911003987.
    46. Skalicky, J., & West, M. (2006). UTAS Community of Pratice Initiative Readings and Ressources. Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction, 1–92.
    47. Smith, S. U., Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger’s community of practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000-2014. Online Learning Journal, 21(1), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963.
    48. Tekleab, A. G., Karaca, A., Quigley, N. R., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016). Re-examining the functional diversity-performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3500–3507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.036.
    49. Terry Deborah J., & Hogg Michael A. (1996). Group Norms and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: A Role for Group Identification. Society for Personality and Social Psychology Inc., 22(8), 776–793.
    50. Van Baren, E., Meelen, M., & Meijs, L. C. P. M. (2015). Promoting Youth Development Worldwide: The Duke of Edinburgh’s International Award. Journal of Youth Development, 10(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2015.423.
    51. Wenger, Etienne (1998) ‘Communities of Practice. Learning as a social system’, Systems Thinker, http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml. Accessed December 30, 2002.
    52. Wenger, E. (2006). Brief introudouction of practice. 1–6. http://wenger-trayner.com/Intro-to-CoPs/.
    53. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11.
    54. Yusoff, W. S., Zulkifli, N. S., Mahmood, A. F., & Abdul, N. A. (2010). Seminar Pendidikan Melayu Antarabangsa ( SePMA ). 1984, 29–31.