Exploring the relationship between tree defects and vandalism behaviour in Kuala Kangsar urban park
List of Authors
  • Helmi Hamzah , Sreetheran Maruthaveeran

Keyword
  • malicious behaviour, tree damage, tree destruction, urban tree

Abstract
  • The research literature describes an intimate relationship between tree defects and vandalism behaviour. Decreased growth due to mechanical injury, reduced aesthetic features from tree part loss or modification, and increased hazards related to tree part weakness are among the impacts attributed to exposure to vandalism incidents. This study aimed to identify a common explanation for these outcomes. It scrutinized the association between tree defects and vandalism behaviour. Vandalism acts were investigated at Kuala Kangsar Urban Park in Perak, Malaysia, by means of an assessment conducted on 348 trees. The survey and inventory demonstrated that the trees had six types of defects and thirteen forms of vandalism acts categorized into three different behaviour types. The results indicate that poor management and maintenance practices, as well as anthropogenic stress, significantly contribute to urban tree vandalism and defects. Decision-makers and tree managers could use the study's findings to effectively deal with the issue of vandalism towards trees in urban areas.

Reference
  • 1. Abd Kadir, M. A., & Othman, N. (2012). Towards a better tomorrow: Street trees and their values in urban areas. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.088

    2. Abdul Malek, N., & Mariapan, M. (2009). Visitors’ perception on vandalism and safety issues in a Malaysian urban park. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(13), 93–107. http://www.um.ase.ro/No13/6.pdf

    3. Abdul Malek, N., & Nashar, A. (2018). Measuring successfulness of Malaysian green open spaces: An assessment tool. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 13(2), 21–37.

    4. Allison, R. B., Wang, X., & Senalik, C. A. (2020). Methods for nondestructive testing of urban trees. MDPI Forest, 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121341

    5. Black, M. (1978). Tree vandalism : Some solutions. Journal of Arboriculture, 4(5), 114–116. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search/display.do?f=2012/OV/OV20120106090010609.xml;US19780336158

    6. Chau, N. L., Jim, C. Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). Species-specific holistic assessment of tree structure and defects in urban Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55(June 2019), 126813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126813

    7. Czaja, M., Kołton, A., & Muras, P. (2020). The complex issue of urban trees - Stress factor accumulation and ecological service possibilities. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 11(932), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/F11090932

    8. de Lourdes Saavedra-Romero, L., Martínez-Trinidad, T., Alvarado-Rosales, D., Hernández-de la Rosa, P., & Villa-Castillo, J. (2021). Damaging agents and tree’s health condition in an urban forest. Open Journal of Forestry, 11(03), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2021.113016

    9. Fernandes, C. O., Da Silva, I. M., Teixeira, C. P., & Costa, L. (2018). Between tree lovers and tree haters. Drivers of public perception regarding street trees and its implications on the urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.014

    10. Fickri, S., & Siregar, I. Z. (2018). Early identification of the quality of tree pruning cuts in a Bogor campus area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 203, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/203/1/012024

    11. Gilbertson, P., & Bradshaw, A. D. (1985). Tree survival in cities: The extent and nature of the problem. Arboricultural Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry, 9(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1985.9746706

    12. Hamzah, H. (2022). Tree vandalism in Malaysia: Criteria for urban forest monitoring. In S. Maruthaveeran, W. Y. Chen, & J. Morgenroth (Eds.), Urban Forestry and Arboriculture in Malaysia (pp. 169–178). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5418-4_9

    13. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., Badrulhisham, N., & Karlinasari, L. (2021). Pruning urban trees without skill: An act of “unintentional vandalism.” Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 6(20), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajebs.v6i20.397

    14. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., & Hussain, N. H. M. (2020). Setting the criteria for urban tree vandalism assessment. Planning Malaysia, 18(4), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i14.815

    15. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., & Mohd Hussain, N. H. (2017). Tree removal application by urban dwellers: A case study of Kajang local authority. In C. Dewi & E. N. Rauzi (Eds.), International Conference on Architecture 2017 (ICRP-AVAN), Unsyiah (Banda Aceh) and UiTM (Perak) (pp. 1–5). Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Syiah Kuala. http://icrp-avan.unsyiah.ac.id/open/Cover&Contents.pdf

    16. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., & Mohd Hussain, N. H. (2020). Addressing public dissatisfaction on urban tree management : A way to enhance landscape quality. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.02.003

    17. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., & Mohd Hussain, N. H. (2021). The Tree Vandalism Model (Tvm): Quantifying urban tree vandalism status. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 6(SI4), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v6isi4.3031

    18. Hamzah, H., Othman, N., Mohd Hussain, N. H., & Simis, M. (2018). The criteria of urban trees regarding the issues of tree vandalism. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 203, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/203/1/012023

    19. Hamzah, H., Shaari, S. J., & Shamsuddin, M. S. (2022). Assessment of tree vandalism level in Kuala Kangsar Urban Park, Perak, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14563

    20. Hasan, R., Othman, N., & Ismail, F. (2018). Social factors influencing hazardous street trees at selected city council in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 2(5), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v3i12.144

    21. He, K., Wei, L., & Wang, B. (2022). How to accurately detect and assess the street trees risk in mega cities: A tree risk assessment method and its application. Research Square, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1605348/v2

    22. Hernández Zaragoza, A. Y., Cetina Alcalá, V. M., López López, M. Á., Hilú, A. C., De La Isla De Bauer, M. D. L., Rosales, D. A., & Rosas, H. G. (2015). Identification of tree damages of three parks of Mexico City. Mexican Journal of Forest Sciences, 6(32), 63–82. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b593/36ec05b743e3efa45226a302f9c068c6e0ab.pdf

    23. Karlinasari, L., Lestari, A. T., Nababan, M. Y. S., Siregar, I. Z., & Nandika, D. (2018). Assessment of urban tree condition using sonic tomography technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 203, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/203/1/012030

    24. Long, M., & Burke, R. H. (2015). Vandalism and anti-social behaviour. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137519269

    25. Morgenroth, J., Santos, B., & Cadwallader, B. (2015). Conflicts between landscape trees and lawn maintenance equipment - The first look at an urban epidemic. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14, 1054–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.10.002

    26. Nowak, McBride, J. R., & Beatty, R. A. (1990). Newly planted street tree growth and mortality. Journal of Arboriculture, 16(5), 124–129. http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/jrnl/1990/ne_1990_nowak_001.pdf

    27. Patro, S. G. K., & Sahu, K. K. (2015). Normalization: A preprocessing stage. ArXiv Cornell University, 1503, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2015.2305

    28. Richardson, E., & Shackleton, C. M. (2014). The extent and perceptions of vandalism as a cause of street tree damage in small towns in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13, 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.003

    29. Roman, L. A., Conway, T. M., Eisenman, T. S., Koeser, A. K., Ordóñez Barona, C., Locke, D. H., Jenerette, G. D., Östberg, J., & Vogt, J. (2020). Beyond ‘trees are good’: Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry. Ambio, 50(3), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01396-8

    30. Travelia, I., & Arifin, H. S. (2018). Tree management at Boulevard landscape of Alam Sutera Serpong, a new city area in Tangerang. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 203(1–9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/203/1/012022

    31. Yfantidou, G., & Anthopoulos, P. (2017). Designing of outdoor green recreational parks. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 12(2), 5–18.