Realities of programme beneficiaries and nutrition gardens in Masvingo, Zimbabwe
List of Authors
  • Munyaradzi, Everjoy , Tarisayi, Kudzayi Savious

Keyword
  • Relegation, NGOs, realities of the poor, nutrition gardens, Zimbabwe

Abstract
  • A plethora of studies has established that nutrition gardens have been utilized in Zimbabwe to alleviate poverty in recent years. This article interrogates the realities of the intended programme beneficiaries of a poverty alleviation intervention in Zimbabwe. The authors drew from the work of Robert Chambers to unpack the marginalization of the realities of the intended beneficiaries and the sustainability of selected nutrition gardens in Zimbabwe. Central to Robert Chambers’ work is the argument that imposed development initiatives are problematic due to lack of programme beneficiary consultation. A purposive sample of 15 participants, made up of 12 beneficiaries of the nutrition gardens and three community leaders were selected for this study. Data was generated utilizing photo-elicitation interviewing and photographs. Thematic data analysis was adopted to analyse the transcribed data. The findings from this study revealed that the selected nutrition gardens in Zimbabwe succumbed to numerous sustainability challenges. Due to these challenges livelihoods of vulnerable communities were lost. The study further noted that the sustainability challenges of the selected nutrition gardens were attributable to the one size fits all approach adopted in the introduction of the nutrition gardens and inadequate research before the implementation of the nutrition gardens. The study also established that there was no programme beneficiary consultation. It is recommended that poverty alleviation interventions should prioritize the realities of the intended beneficiaries.

Reference
  • 1. Asian Development Bank (2004). Effectiveness of Participatory Approaches: Do the New Approaches Offer an Effective Solution to the Conventional Problems in Rural Development Projects? Special Evaluation Study. Operations Evaluation Department. Asian Development Bank.
    2. Bignante, E. (2010). The use of photo-elicitation in field research: Exploring Maasai representations and use of natural resources. Numero, 11:1-18.
    3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2):77-101.
    4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflective thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11 (4):589–597.
    5. Chambers, R. & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. Brighton: University of Sussex Institute for Development Studies.
    6. Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development, 22 (10):1437-1454.
    7. Chambers, R. (1997). Editorial: Responsible well-being-a personal agenda for development. World Development, 25 (11):1743-1754.
    8. Chambers, R. (2012). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? in R. Jolly (ed) Milestones and turning points in Development thinking, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    9. Chazovachii, B., Mutami, C. & Bowora, J. (2013). Community gardens and food security in rural livelihood development: The case of entrepreneurial and market gardens in Mberengwa, Zimbabwe. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1 (12):8-17.
    10. Chihambakwe, M., Mafongoya, P. & Jiri, O. (2019). Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture as a pathway to food security: A review mapping the use of food sovereignty. Challenges, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/challe10010006.
    11. Chimbwanda, F. (2016). Perceptions and attitudes of participants toward urban gardening. A case study of nutrition gardens in Mucheke town, Masvingo. Civil and Environmental Research, 8 (8):59-63.
    12. Chingono, N. (2019). Urban poverty on the rise: World Food Programme. The Independent in Business. 29 March 2019.
    13. Chinyanganya, T.P., Ncube-Phiri, S., Mapuva, J. & Tichagwa, J. (2015). NGOs, urban community gardening and sustainable development: Case study of Wards 3 and 7, Masvingo district, Zimbabwe. Global Science Research Journals, 3 (4): 116-124.
    14. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th Ed). London: Routledge.
    15. Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks, California.
    16. Douglas, E.P., Jordan, S.S., Lande, M. and Bumbaco, A.E., (2015). Artifact Elicitation as a Method of Qualitative Inquiry in Engineering Education. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 14-17 June 2015, Seattle, WA.
    17. Glaw, X., Inder, K., Kable, A. and Hazelton, M. (2017). Visual Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Autophotography and Photo Elicitation Applied to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16:1-8.
    18. Gondo, R., Madigele, P.K., Mogomotsi, G.E.J., Tokwe, T., Chakuya, J. & Chirefu, H. (2017). Sustainability of urban agriculture under economic and political instability in Karoi, Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Advanced Research, 4 (2):52-62.
    19. Grigg, D.B. (1974). The Agricultural Systems of the world: An Evolutionary Approach. New York, Cambridge University Press.
    20. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
    21. Manjengwa, J., Matema, C. and Tirivanhu, D. (2016). Understanding urban poverty in two high- density suburbs of Harare, Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 33 (1): 23-38.
    22. Mannay, D. (2013). Who put that on there … why why why? Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production. Visual Studies 28:136–146.
    23. Muzawazi, H.D. (2015). Community gardens as a strategy for coping with climate shocks in Bikita district, Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Pretoria.
    24. Neuman, W.L. (2011). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. (3rd Ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
    25. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
    26. Tarisayi, K.S. (2015). Non-Governmental Organisations: An Ubuntu Perspective. Journal of Studies in Management and Planning, 1 (1), 37-44.
    27. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (2019). Facts and Figures 2018. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency, Harare.