Reading comprehension strategies of the efal learners in the fet phase: teacher perspectives
List of Authors
  • Zano, Kufakunesu

Keyword
  • English First Additional Language, reading comprehension, language learning strategies, English as a foreign language

Abstract
  • The level of English First Additional Language (EFAL) Reading Comprehension competence among school learners in some schools in South Africa is a concern. English is used as a medium of teaching and learning in most South African public schools although the majority of these learners are EFAL speakers. To counter this anxiety, reading comprehension interventions become handy. This study aimed to explore the reading comprehension strategies of South African high school EFAL learners in the FET phase. The study employed a non-experimental quantitative design to collect data. The general version 7.0 questionnaire on strategy inventory of language learning (SILL) Oxford (1990) on identifying strategies learners use in reading comprehension was used. The sampling frame was 80 grade 11 high school EFAL learners in South Africa. The results of the study show that EFAL learners use multiple language learning strategies to enhance their understanding of English in an EFAL setting. It is difficult to strike consistency in language learning strategies because the choice of a language learning strategy differs from one EFAL learner to another. It remains important that language practitioners become aware of the need to equip EFAL teachers and learners as they strive to sharpen EFAL learners’ language learning skills.

Reference
  • 1. Almutairi, N. R. (2018). Effective Reading Strategies for Increasing the Reading Comprehension Level of Third-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities. Ph.D. Thesis. Western Michigan University.
    2. Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3 (3): 2-34.
    3. Arkarsu, O.,& Harputlu, L., (2014). Perceptions of EFL students toward Academic Reading’, The Reading Matrix 14(1), 315–327.
    4. Charamba, E. (2020b). Translanguaging in a Multilingual Class: a study of the Relation between students’ languages and Epistemological access in Science, International Journal of Science Education, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1783019.
    5. Charamba, E. (2020a). Pushing linguistic boundaries: translanguaging in a bilingual Science and Technology classroom, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development DOI:10.1080/01434632.2020.1783544.
    6. Coffi, O. R. L.(2017). The hegemony of English language in the Primary School Education: South Africa’s language identity struggle. Master Thesis. University of Pretoria.
    7. Cook, M. J. (2016). How does learning about affixes (prefixes and suffixes) help English Language Learners (ELLS) understand the meaning and use of affixes? School of Education Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations. 4173. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4173
    8. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement – Grades 10–12. English First Additional Language. Pretoria: South Africa.
    9. Gardiner, M. (2008). Education in rural areas. Centre for Education Policy Development. Johannesburg.
    10. Haukås, A. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach, International Journal of Multilingualism, DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2015.1041960.
    11. Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2009). Teaching Readers of English: Students, Text, and Context, Routledge: UK, p. 49.
    12. Kulikova, O.(2015). Vocabulary learning strategies and beliefs about vocabulary learning: a study of beginning university students of Russian in the United States. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa.
    13. Kumar, C. P.(2014). Techniques of Vocabulary Competency in English Language Learning. International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences: Educational Quest, 5(2):109-113.
    14. Lems, K., Meller, L. D., & Soro, T. M. (2010). Teaching Reading to English Language Learner, NY: The Guilford Press, p. 171.
    15. Mangaleswaran, S., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). The Impact of the Implementation of CLT on Students’ Speaking Skills. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 9(4):75-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.04.2019.p8814.
    16. Marliasari, S. (2017). Teaching reading comprehension by using skimming and scanning techniques to the tenth grade students of Sman 1 Gulembang. English Community Journal (2017), 1 (2): 109–122.
    17. Marzano R.(2004). Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement. Research on what works in schools. ASCD.
    18. Mboacha, E. (2015). A comparative study of the reading comprehension of English second language learners between urban and rural schools in Limpopo Province. MEd Thesis. The University of Limpopo.
    19. Mickulecky, B. S., & Jeffries, L. (2004). More Reading Power: Reading for Pleasure, Comprehension Skills, Thinking Skills, Reading Faster.New York: Pearson Education, p. 74.
    20. Middleton, ME, (2011). Reading motivation and Reading Comprehension. Master Thesis. The Ohio State University.
    21. Mikulecky, B.,& Jeffries, L (2004). More reading power. Pearson: ESL.
    22. Molotja, T. W., & Themane, M. (2018). Enhancing learners’ reading habits through reading bags at secondary schools’, Reading & Writing 9(1), a185. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/rw.v9i1.185.
    23. Napu, N.,& Hasan, R. (2019). Translation Problems Analysis of Students' Academic Essay.International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(5):1-11. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2019.2.5.1.
    24. Nation, P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP.
    25. Nation, P.(2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 27(1):136-145.
    26. Nhapulo, M.A., Simon, E., & Van Herreweghe, M.(2017). Enhancing academic reading skills through extensive reading.Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35(1), 17–40, viewed n.d., from http://hdl.handle.net/1854/ LU-852051. 2017/03/20.
    27. Oxford, R. L.,& Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
    28. Palani, K. K.(2012). Promising reading habits and creating literate society. International Reference Research Journal 2(1), 91–98.
    29. Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2012). A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners' English Pronunciation Learning and the Strategies for Instruction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 119-128.
    30. Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2016). What Factors Influence the English Pronunciation of EFL Learners? Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 6(2), 314-326.
    31. Prah, K. K. (2000). African languages for the education of Africans. CASAS. Cape Town.
    32. Prinsloo, C.(2015). Explicit academic vocabulary teaching of two Grade 4 Natural Science and Technology teachers in the North West Province. MEd Thesis. South Africa: North West University.
    33. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Pearson Education Limited, London.
    34. Sari, L. (2017). Improving reading comprehension through directed reading thinking activity (DRTA) strategy for the eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 17 Medan in the academic year of 2016-2-17. S-1 Degree Thesis. State Islamic University of North Sumatera, Medan.
    35. Schmitt, N.(2008). Language Teaching Research Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, Vol 12(3): 329-363.
    36. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, (95):26–43.
    37. Smith, F. (2004). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read Sixth Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    38. Webb, S.(2008). The effect of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, (20):232–245.
    39. Zano, K.(2019). High school first additional language learners’ perceptions about multilingual education in a classroom. Gender & Behaviour, 17(4):14379-14391.
    40. Zano, K. (2020a). For children without the language of feedback: Multilingualism in promoting peer and teacher feedback. Gender & Behaviour, 18(2):15541-15550.
    41. Zano K. (2020b). High School English Foreign Language Teachers’ Perceptions Related To Multilingualism In A Classroom: A Case Study. Ponte Journal, Vol. 76, 5/1 | 116-131 DOI: 10.21506/j.ponte.2020.5.9.