Amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi dan keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah
List of Authors
  • Blondigel Ansley , Mohamed Yusoff Mohd Nor

Keyword
  • pelan kontingensi, pengurusan bencana sekolah

Abstract
  • Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tahap amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi dan tahap keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah di daerah Song. Selain itu, kajian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan antara amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi dengan keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah. Kebanyakan kajian lepas berkaitan pengurusan bencana adalah tentang tahap kesediaan menghadapi bencana dan tahap pengetahuan guru dan murid mengenai bencana. Sebaliknya, topik amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi dan keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah jarang disentuh. Kajian ini diharap dapat mengisi jurang kajian di antara kedua-dua topik ini. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk kajian tinjauan kuantitatif dan data dikutip menggunakan soal selidik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahawa kedua-dua tahap amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi (min=3.0938, s.p=0.92586) dan tahap keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah (min=3.3926, s.p=0.73955) di daerah Song adalah pada tahap sederhana tinggi. Keputusan ujian korelasi Pearson pula menunjukkan bahawa terdapat hubungan linear positif yang kuat antara kedua-dua pemboleh ubah di mana nilai r=0.878. Ini bermakna amalan pelaksanaan pelan kontingensi mempunyai hubungan yang kuat dengan keberkesanan pengurusan bencana sekolah di daerah Song. Kesimpulannya, adalah mustahil untuk mengurus bencana dengan berkesan tanpa pelan kontingensi yang baik. Oleh itu, sekolah perlu mempunyai pelan kontingensi yang baik untuk mengurus bencana demi mengurangkan impak negatif bencana terhadap organisasi, persekitaran dan warga sekolah.

Reference
  • 1. Alexander, P. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    2. Amin, A. (2005). Social science research, conception, methodology and analysis. Kampala: Makerere University Printery.

    3. ASEAN. (2016). School disaster risk management guidelines for Southeast Asia. Jakarta: ASEAN.

    4. Batuk, F., Sengezer, B. & Emem. O. (2008). Relationship between disaster management, urban planning and NSDI. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 37, 411-444.

    5. Bird, D. K. (2009). The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – a review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9(4), 1307-1325.

    6. BLS (Bureau of Labour Statistics). (2001). Education administrators. Retrieved 20 November 2020 from www.bls.gov/oco/oco2001.htm#nature.

    7. Bostrom, N. & Cirkovic, M. M. (2008). Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    8. Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. Bmj, 328(745), 1312-1315.

    9. Coakes, S. J., Steed, L. & Dzidic, P. (2006). SPSS version 13.0 for Windows. Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

    10. Devos, G. (1998). The concept and practice of a school-based management contest: intergration of leadership development and organizational learning. Education Administration Quarterly, 34, 17-700.

    11. Eriksson, K. & McConnell, A. (2011). Contingency planning for crisis management: recipe for success or political fantasy?. Policy and Society, 30, 89-99.

    12. Fernandes, L. J., & Saldanha da Gama, F. (2008). Contingency Planning - A Literature Review. Supply Chain Management and Competitiveness. Macmillan, India.

    13. Hayashi, T. (2014). Disaster prevention education in Merapi volcano area prmary schools: Focusing on students’ perception and teachers’ performance. Procedia Enviromental Sciences, 20, 668-677.

    14. Ho, K. H., A. H. Ghazali, & Chong, S. F. (2002). Calibration and Evaluation of Modified Tank Model (Flood Forecasting Model) for Kelantan River Basin. Proceeding of Water Engineering Conference Malaysia. July 23-24. UPM.

    15. Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. G., & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster Management Cycle – A Theoretical Approach. Management & Marketing, 6(1), 43-50.

    16. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

    17. Lemrow, M. (2003). The 21st century principal: current issues in leadership and policy. National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), 87 (634), 84.

    18. Lund Research Ltd. (2013). Pearson’s product-moment correlation in SPSS. Leard Statistics. Retrieved 10 November 2020 from https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/pc/pearson-correlation-in-spss.php.

    19. McConnell, A. & Drennan, L. (2006). Mission Impossible? Planning and Preparing for Crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(2), 61-70.

    20. Moe, T. L., & Pathranarakul, P. (2006). An intergrated approach to natural disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 5(3), 396-413.

    21. Mohit, M. A., & Sellu, G. M. (2013). Mitigation of climate change effects through non-structural flood disaster management in Pekan town, Malaysia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 567-573.

    22. Momani, N. M., & Salmi, A. (2012). Preparedness of schools in the Province of Jeddah to deal with earthquakes risks. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 21(4), 463-473.

    23. Nazli, N. N. N. N., Sipon, S.. & Radzi, H. M. (2013). Analysis of training needs in disaster preparedness. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 140, 576-580.

    24. Nunnaly, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. Edisi ke-3. New York: McGraw Hill.

    25. NVSD (North Vancouver School District). (2002). School administrative personnel-policy. Retrieved 20 November 2020 from www.nvsd44.bc.ca/NV/Policies/502.asp?ID.

    26. Ozmen, F. (2006). The level of preparedness of the schools for disasters from the aspect of the school principals. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 15(3), 383-395.

    27. Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 27(4), 336-350.

    28. Quarantelli, E. L. (1996). The future is not the past repeated: Projecting disaster in the 21st century from present trends. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(4), 228-240.

    29. Shapiro, I. & Bedi, S. (2007). Political contingency: Studying the unexpected, the accidental and the unforeseen. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    30. Sii, L. M. L, & Mohammed Sani bin Ibrahim. (2013). Transformational Leadership and Teacher Commitment in Secondary Schools of Sarawak. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies, 2 (2), 51-65.

    31. Singh, S. S. B., Rathakrishnan, B., Kiflee, D. N. A., Talip, R., Zulfikar, & Lan, A. S. S. (2018). Penilaian pengetahuan dan kesediaan menghadapi bencana gempa bumi dalam kalangan guru sekolah di Ranau, Sabah. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 13(2), 73-88.

    32. Stieger, S., & Reips, U. D. (2010). What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: A paradata collection tool and an empirical study. Computers in Human Behaviour. 26(6), 1488-1495.

    33. United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). (2008). Disaster Management–Preparedness Methodology In Assam. Retrieved 30 April 2020 from http://data.undp.org.in/dmweb/Article-DRM%20Assam.pdf.

    34. Wang, J. J. (2016). Study on the context of school-based disaster management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 224-234.

    35. Williams, G., Bath, S., & Russell, L. 2000. Responding to urban crisis: The emergency planning response to the bombing of Manchester city centre. Cities, 17(4), 293-304.

    36. Yilmaz, K. (2003). Earthquake and system: Sabah Gazetesi. Retrieved 19 November 2020 from http://arsiv.sabah.com.tr/2003/05/06/s0806.html.