Persepsi kendiri murid terhadap tugasan analisis teks dalam mata pelajaran sejarah
List of Authors
  • M. Kaviza

Keyword
  • Pembelajaran sejarah, persepsi kendiri, tugasan analisis, sumber teks

Abstract
  • Kajian tinjauan berbentuk deskriptif ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti tahap persepsi kendiri terhadap tugasan analisis teks dari segi minat, kompetensi, pilihan dan tekanan. Seramai 55 orang murid Tingkatan Empat berdasarkan teknik persampelan bertujuan terlibat dalam kajian ini. Soal selidik Task Evaluation Inventory yang diadaptasi yang telah disahkan oleh dua orang pakar penilai dalam pendidikan sejarah serta mempunyai nilai kebolehpercayaan yang baik merupakan instrumen kajian ini. Data kajian ini dianalisis secara deskriptif melalui perisian IBM SPPS. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa tahap persepsi kendiri terhadap tugasan analisis teks secara keseluruhannya berada pada tahap sederhana. Tambahan pula, persepsi kendiri dari aspek minat, kompetensi dan pilihan berada pada tahap tinggi, manakala persepsi kendiri dari aspek tekanan pula berada pada tahap rendah dalam kajian ini. Implikasi kajian ini telah mencadangkan bahawa guru-guru sejarah untuk mereka bentuk tugasan analisis teks sebagai salah satu aktiviti pembelajaran efektif di dalam kelas.

Reference
  • 1. Brante, E.W. (2019). A multiple-case study on students’ sourcing activities in a group task. Information & Communications Technology in Education, 6, 1-23.
    2. Breakstone, J., & Smith, M. (2013).Using Library of Congress Primary Sources for assessment. The TPS Journal, 1(3), 1-8.
    3. Brown, C.A., & Dotson, K. (2007). A Case Study Using Digital Primary Source Documents. Tech Trends, 51(3), 30-37.
    4. Cerdan, R., Candel, C & Leppink, J. (2018). Cognitive load and learning in the study of multiple documents. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-7.
    5. Cerdan, R., Marin, M.C & Candel, C. (2013). The role of perspective on student’s use of multiple documents to solve an open-ended tasks. Psicologia Educativa, 85-94.
    6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    7. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination of Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
    8. Du, H & List, A. (2020). Researching and writing based on multiple texts. Learning and Instruction, 1-26.
    9. Fehn, B & Koeppen, K.E. (1998). Intensive document-based instruction in a social studies methods course and student teachers’ attitudes and practice in subsequent field experiences. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(4), 461-484.
    10. Fitzgerald, J.C. (2009). Textbooks and Primary Source Analysis. Social Studies Research and Practice, 4(8), 37-43.
    11. Getman-Eraso, J & Culkin, K. (2017). Close reading: Engaging and empowering history students through document analysis on eportfolio. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(1), 29-42.
    12. Hastings, P., Hughes, S., Magliano, J.P., Goldman, S.R & Lawless, K. (2012). Assessing the use of multiple sources in student esssy. Behaviour Research, 44, 622-633.
    13. Hazri Jamil. (2003). Teknik mengajar Sejarah. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
    14. Hover, S.V., Hicks, D., & Dack, H. (2016). From Source to Evidence? Teachers’ Use of Historical Sources in Their Classrooms. The Social studies, 107(6), 209-217.
    15. Hynd, C.R. (1999). Teaching students to think critically using multiple texts in history. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(6), 428-436.
    16. Jamil Ahmad. (2002). Pemupukan Budaya Penyelidikan di Kalangan Guru di Sekolah: Satu Penilaian. Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran, Fakulti Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
    17. Johansson, P. (2017). Learning study as a clinical research practice to generate knowledge about the learning of historical primary source analysis. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 167-181.
    18. List, A., Du, H & Wang, Y. (2019). Understanding students’ perceptions of tasks assignments. Contemporary Educational Psychology.
    19. Macedo-Rouet, M., Braasch, J.L.G., Britt, M.A & Rouet, J.F. (2013). Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 204-226.
    20. Merkt, M., Werner, M., & Wagner, W. (2017). Historical thinking skills and mastery of multiple documents tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 135-146.
    21. Nersater, A. (2019). Building on student conceptions in the design of history instruction addressing sources: A learning study in upper secondary school. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies.
    22. Nieuwenhuyse, K.V., Roose, H., Wils, K., Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L. (2017). Reasoning with and /or about sources? The use of primary sources in Flemish Secondary school history education. Journal of Historical consciousness, historical cultures and history education, 48-70.
    23. Nokes, J.D, Dole, J.A & Hacker, D.J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heurictics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492-504.
    24. Nokes, J.D. (2011). Recognizing and addressing the barriers to adolescents “Reading like Historians”. The History Teacher, 44(3), 379-404.
    25. Nokes, J.D. (2014). Elementary students’ roles and epistemic stances during document-based history lessons. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 375-413.
    26. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometrie Theory (2nd Ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
    27. Omardin Haji Ashaari & Yunus Muhammad. (1996). Kaedah Pengajaran sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
    28. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Sejarah Tingkatan Empat. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
    29. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2018). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
    30. Rantala, J. & Van Den Berg, M. (2015). Finnish high school and university students’ ability to handle multiple source documents in history. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, historical cultures and history education, 2(1), 70-88.
    31. Reisman, A. (2012). The “Document-Based Lesson”: Bringing Disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233-264.
    32. Rothschild, E. (2000). The impact of the document-based question on the teaching of United States History. The History Teacher, 33(4), 495-500.
    33. Rouet, J-F., Britt, M.A., Mason, R.A & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Pscyhology, 88(3), 478-493.
    34. Ryan, R.M., & Koestner, R., & Deci, E.L. (1991). Varied forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motived. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185-205.
    35. Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.R & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept, validation of construct interpretation. Proceesing 6th Asian Workshop on Child Adolescent Development, 264- 273.
    36. Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430-456.
    37. Stromso, H & Braten. I. (2014). Students’ sourcing while reading and writing from multiple web documents. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(2), 92-111.
    38. Suntharalingam. (1985). Pengenalan Kepada Sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Marican & Sons Sdn Bhd
    39. Swan, K.O., Hofer, M.J & Gallachio, L. (2006). Historical scene investigation (HSI); Engaging students in case based investigations using web based historical documents. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(2), 250-261.
    40. Wiley, J & Voss, J. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Pscychology, 91(2), 301-311.
    41. Wiley, J., Griffin, T.D, Steffens, B & Britt, M.A. (2020). Epistemic belief about the value of intergrating information across multiple documents in history, 1- 16.
    42. Wineburg, S.S. (1991). On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach between School and Academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495-519.
    43. Wirth, J. & Villares, E. (2015). Examining adolescent wellness, success skills and academic performance: A classroom intervebtion approach. The Journal of Happiness & Well- Being, 3(2), 204-217.