A phenomenological study on the reception of Philippine LGBTQ+ audiences towards queerbaiting in American Television series
List of Authors
  • Caitlin Danielle M. Martin , Nala Maica S. Pilar , Ronnie D. Pangan

Keyword
  • LGBTQ+ Community, Queerbaiting, American Television Series, Queer Representation

Abstract
  • Media has played an important role in shaping opinions and biases that pertain to certain issues. With regards to the LGBTQ+ community, there is a certain need to be represented correctly in the media, to stray from stereotypes that may be harmful to how people perceive them in the real world. The accuracy in the representation of these individuals are important in order for identification to take place and self-esteem to be supported. With the rise in popularity of LGBTQ+ themes, the general public encounters these characters in the media, and in some cases may conjure up opinions that would not be based on truth but on stereotypes. Substituting actual representation for the sake of entertainment, mixing themes of untruths to reality to appeal more to their target audience. One case of misrepresentation is queerbaiting. In this study, the researchers aim to look into the perception of the Philippine LGBTQ+ community towards queerbaiting in American series. The method of gathering data is through three focus group discussions, and the response is analyzed using interpersonal deception theory and audience reception theory. The results of the study were that the community finds it tolerable and sees it as a limited kind of representation. They also see it as a marketing strategy to garner more views, but it being intentional or unintentional raised different insights. And lastly, although the community consider it as a representation, they still would’ve appreciated a sincerer and multidimensional character representation.

Reference
  • 1. Abad, M. (2020). 73% of Filipinos think “homosexuality should be accepted by society” – report. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/filipinos-acceptance-homosexuality-2019-pe w-research-report

    2. Akita, K., Besel, R. D., Comeforo, K., Drushel, B. E., Guthrie, J., Hidahl, B., ... & Zingsheim, J. (2013). Queer media images: LGBT perspectives. Lexington Books.

    3. Ayoub, P. M. (2018). How the Media Has Helped Change Public Views about Lesbian and Gay People.

    4. Bautista, A. & Villaverde A. (2019). Out of the Closet: The Role of Gay Men as Reflected in the Philippine Advertisements

    5. Beltran, M. (2020). On Screen, Normalizing Queer Love in the Philippines. https://thediplomat. com/2020/07/on-screen-normalizing-queer-love-in-the-philippines/

    6. Bond, B. J., & Compton, B. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences' endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 717-732.

    7. Brennan, J. (2019). Queerbaiting and Fandom : Teasing Fans Through Homoerotic Possibilities. University Of Iowa Press.

    8. Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (2020). Interpersonal Deception Theory, 532–536. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339784319_Interpersonal_Deception_Theory

    9. Caldwell, E. C. (2018, May 27). How Ellen DeGeneres changed TV.

    10. Collier, C.M. (2015). The love that refuses to speak its name : examining queerbaiting and fan-producer interactions in fan cultures.

    11. Cook, C. (2018). A content analysis of LGBT representation on broadcast and streaming television (Master's thesis, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 2018). Chattanooga.

    12. David, J. (2012). Thinking Straight: Queer Imaging in Lino Brocka’s Maynila (1975). Plaridel: A Journal of Philippine Communication, Media, and Society, 9(2), 21-40.

    13. De Ridder, S., Dhaenens, F., & Van Bauwel, S. (2011). Queer theory and change. Towards a pragmatic approach to resistance and subversion in media research on gay and lesbian identities. Observatorio (OBS*), 5(2), 197–215

    14. Drake, B. (2020, May 30). How LGBT adults see society and how the public sees them.

    15. Frenk, S. (2017). Telling the true story : queerbaiting, representation, and fan resistance in the BBC Sherlock fandom.

    16. Goldberg, S. K., Rothblum, E. D., Russell, S. T., & Meyer, I. H. (2019). Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: Demographic Characteristic and Sexuality of Queer People in a U.S. Representative Sample of Sexual Minorities.

    17. Halenárová, B. H. (2018). Misrepresentation of LGBTQ+ Characters on American Television Shows.

    18. Hofmann, M. (2018). Johnlock meta and authorial intent in Sherlock fandom: Affirmational or transformational? Transformative Works and Cultures, 28. https://doi.org/10.3983/ twc.2018.1465

    19. Hogan, H. N. (2019, Nov. 25). Top 25 most egregious acts of queerbaiting on TV. Autostraddle. Retrieved from https://www.autostraddle.com/top-25-most-egregious-acts-of-queer baiting/

    20. Joyrich, L. (2014). Queer Television Studies: Currents, Flows, and (Main)streams. Cinema Journal, 53(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0015

    21. Kettler, S. (2020, April 14). How Ellen DeGeneres' Historic coming-out episode Changed Television.

    22. Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2008) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 4th edition. New York: SAGE.

    23. Lavigne, C. (2012). The Noble Bachelor and the Crooked Man: Subtext and Sexuality in the BBC’s Sherlock

    24. Marche, G. (2019). Sexuality, Subjectivity, and LGBTQ Militancy in the United States. Amsterdam University Press.

    25. Marcus, E. (2019, June 17). TIME's reporting on lgbt Issues shaped and SKEWED ATTITUDES.

    26. Martin, J. (2007). Audiences and Reception Theory. Sociology Made Simple.

    27. McCombes, S. (2021, August 30). An introduction to sampling methods. Scribbr. Retrieved November 10, 2021, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/sampling-methods/.

    28. McDermott, M. (9479675). (2020). The Affective Politics of Queerbaiting: Fandom, Identity and Representation.

    29. Ng, E. (2017). Between text, paratext, and context: Queerbaiting and the contemporary media landscape. Transformative Works and Cultures, 24(1).

    30. Nordin, E. (2015). From queer reading to queerbaiting: The battle over the polysemic text and the power of hermeneutics.

    31. Payuyo, L. A. (2012). The Portrayal of Gays in Popular Filipino Films, 2000 to 2010. Philippine Sociological Review, 60, 291–322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43486348

    32. Poushter, J., & Kent, N. (2020, June). The Global Divide on Homosexuality Persists. PEW Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/25/global-divide-on-homosexuality-persists/

    33. Pugh, T. (2018). The Queer Fantasies of the American Family Sitcom. Rutgers University Press.

    34. Sánchez-Soriano, J. J., & García-Jiménez, L. (2020). The media construction of LGBT+ characters in Hollywood blockbuster movies. The use of pinkwashing and queerbaiting. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (77), 95-115.

    35. Sheehan, C. (2015). Queer-baiting on the BBC’s Sherlock: Addressing the invalidation of queer experience through online fan fiction communities.

    36. Smith, C. (2021, March 1). The importance and challenges of queer representation in PH media, according to gay creators. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from https://philstarlife. com/geeky/765077-queer-representation-in-ph-media-important-but-tricky?page=3.

    37. Woods, N., & Hardman, D. (2021). ‘it’s just absolutely everywhere’: Understanding LGBTQ experiences of queerbaiting. Psychology & Sexuality, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19419899.2021.1892808.