Penggunaan sumber sejarah dalam teknik Peer Instruction terhadap motivasi intrinsik
List of Authors
  • M. Kaviza

Keyword
  • Teknik Peer Instruction, sumber sejarah, motivasi intrinsik, mata pelajaran sejarah

Abstract
  • Oleh kerana salah satu objektif kurikulum sejarah adalah membina minat terhadap sejarah sebagai satu disiplin ilmu yang dinamik melalui proses pembelajaran secara mendalam yang berpusatkan murid, maka kajian eksperimental dengan rekabentuk Pre-Experimental: One Group Pretest– Posttest ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti kesan penggunaan sumber sejarah dalam teknik Peer Instruction terhadap motivasi intrinsik dalam kalangan murid. Seramai 25 orang murid Tingkatan Empat dari dua buah kelas sedia ada melalui teknik persampelan bertujuan dari sebuah sekolah menengah harian telah dipilih sebagai sampel dalam kajian ini. Instrumen kajian ini merupakan soal selidik Motivation Intrinsic Inventory yang telah diadaptasi, disahkan pakar penilai dan mempunyai nilai kebolehpercayaan yang baik. Data kajian ini dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensi iaitu ujian ANOVA Sehala dengan pengukuran berulang melalui perisian IBM SPSS. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa penggunaan sumber sejarah dalam teknik Peer Instruction adalah berkesan secara signifikan terhadap peningkatan dan kekekalan motivasi intrinsik dalam kalangan murid. Kesimpulannya, penggunaan sumber sejarah dalam teknik Peer Instruction berpotensi dilaksanakan dalam pendidikan sejarah untuk meningkatkan motivasi secara efektif.

Reference
  • 1. Abdul Rahim Abdul Rashid. (2000). Model dan Pendekatan Pengajaran Sejarah KBSM. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    2. Abdul Razaq Ahmad et al. (2015). Application of multiple intelligence theory to increase student motivation in learning history. Asian Culture and History, 7(1), 210-219.
    3. Alves, D. (2014). Introduction: digital methods and tools for historical research. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 8(1), 1-12.
    4. Ambika Luhitadati, Maskun & Suparman Arif. (2017). Hubungan motivasi berprestasi dengan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah, 5(8), 1-12.
    5. Andrews, G.P., & Wang di, Y.P. (2017). The role of agency and memory in historical understanding: revolution, reform dan rebellion. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Apaolaza-Liorente, D., & Arguero, B.E. (2019). Doing history: historical sources and active methodologies to foster historical thinking in secondary eschool. ENSAYOS: Revista de la Facultaced de Education de Albacete, 34(1), 29-40.
    6. Booth, A. (2001). Developing history student skills in the transition to university. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 487-503.
    7. Brante, E.W. (2019). A multiple-case study on students soucing activities in a group task. Information & Communication Technology in Education, 6, 1-13.
    8. Breakstone, J., & Smith, M. (2013). Using library of congress primary sources for assessment. The TPS Journal, 1(3), 1-8.
    9. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. New York: McGraw Hill.
    10. Budini, N., Marino, L, Carreri, R, Camora, C & Giorgi, S. (2019). Perceptions of students after implementing peer instruction in an introductory physics course. Smart Learning Environment, 6(20), 1-8.
    11. Caruth, G.D. (2018). Student engagement, retention and motivation: assessing academic success in today college students participatory. Educational Research, 5(1), 17-30.
    12. Cetin-Dindar, A. (2015). Student motivation in constructivist learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 12(2), 233-247.
    13. Ch’ng, S. H. (2005). Penggunaan ICT untuk memperkembangkan pengetahuan, kreativiti dan minat terhadap mata pelajaran sejarah tingkatan empat. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Malaya.
    14. Christiane, G.V.W et al. (2017). Teaching computing in a multidisplinary ways in social studies classes in school: a case study. International Journal of Computer Sciences Education in Schools, 1(2), 1-14.
    15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    16. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th ed). London: Routledge Falmer.
    17. Crouch, C.H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experiences and result. American Journal of Physics, 69, 670-977.
    18. Decha, S., Narumon, E., & Kwan, A. (2010). The effectiveness of peer instruction and structured inquiry on conceptual understanding of force and motion: a case study from Thailand. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 63-79.
    19. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination of human behavior. New York: Plenum.
    20. Di, Z., & Haoran, X. (2018). Flipping on English writing class with technology enhanced just in time teaching and peer instruction. Journal Interactive Learning Environment, 1-6.
    21. Drake, F.D., & Brown, S.D. (2003). A systematic approach to improve student’s historical thinking. The History Teacher, 36(4), 465-489.
    22. Draper, S., & Brown, M.I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted, 20, 81-94.
    23. Elias, G.R., & Victoria, S. (2017). Understanding student motivation: a key to retention in higher education. Scientific Annals of Economics and Bussiness, 64(1), 45-57.
    24. Fadzilah Sulaiman (2010). Keberkesanan aplikasi teori kecerdasan pelbagai untuk meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar berpencapaian akademik rendah dalam mata pelajaran sejarah. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Kabangsaan Malaysia.
    25. Fitzgerald, J.C. (2009). Textbooks and primary source analysis. Social Studies Research and Practice, 4(8), 37-43.
    26. Gaffield, C. (2000); Primary sources, historical thinking and the emerging redefinition of the ba as research degree. Facsimile, 12-17.
    27. Gok, T. (2012a). The effects of peer instruction on students’ conceptual learning and motivation. Asia-pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1-17.
    28. Gok, T. (2012b). The impact of peer instruction on college students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 417-436.
    29. Gottfried, A. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (6), 671-685.
    30. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 69(5), 1448-1460.
    31. Havekes, H., Arno-Coppen, P., & Luttenberg, J. (2012). Knowing and doing history: a conceptual framework and pedagogy for teaching historical contextualization. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 11(1), 72-93.
    32. Haydn, T., Arthur, J. & Hunt, M. (2001). Learning to teach history in the secondary school: a companion to school experience. London: Routledge Falmer.
    33. Hazri Jamil. (2003). Teknik mengajar sejarah. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors. Heinich, R, Molenda, Russel, J.D & Smaldino, S.E (2002). Instructional Media & Technologies for Learning (7th ed). Ohio: Merill Prentice Hall.
    34. Hill, E.W., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2019). Impact of primary sources activities on students understanding, engagement dan interest. Proceedings of Studies in Teaching-2019 Research Digest, 13-18.
    35. Huistra, H., & Mellink, B. (2016). Phrasing history: selecting sources in digital repositories. Historical methods, 49(4), 220-229. Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved from: http:///www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic_motivation_inventory/
    36. Kaviza, M. (2018a). Kesan penggunaan teknik peer instruction dengan pendekatan kelas flipped terhadap pencapaian pemahaman konsep sejarah. Journal of ICT in Education, 5(1), 14- 26.
    37. Kaviza, M. (2018b). Sources-peer instruction: kaedah untuk meningkatkan pemahaman sejarah dalam kalangan murid berpencapaian rendah. Asian Education Action Research Journal, 7(1), 1-10.
    38. Kaviza, M. (2019a). Motivasi intrinsik dalam kalangan murid tingkatan empat yang mengambil mata pelajaran sejarah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(31), 215-224.
    39. Kaviza, M. (2019b). Pelaksanaan pendekatan flipped classroom dengan teknik peer instruction di sekolah menengah: persepsi murid terhadap pembelajaran sejarah. Proceedings of ICECRS: Global Education, Perspectives, Innovations, Issues and Challenges, 3, 1-10.
    40. Kaviza, M., Fauziah Abdul Rahim, & Nurliyana Bukhari. (2018). Hubungan antara kesediaan dalam pembelajaran berasaskan sumber-sumber sejarah dengan motivasi intrinsik. Jurnal pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 11, 52-63.
    41. Lasry, N., Mazur, E., & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: from Harvard to the two years college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066-1069.
    42. Lorimer, M.R. (2019). Engaging adolescent struggling readers through decision making role play simulation: using primary source documents. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 193-203.
    43. Malar Muthiah. (2010). Membanding kesan kaedah lima fasa Needham, kaedah STAD dan kaedah konvensional terhadap pencapaian, kemahiran sosial dan minat dalam pengajaran sejarah. Tesis kedoktoran. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
    44. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: a user’s manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall McConnell et al. (2018). Using concepts to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(1), 61-68.
    45. Michael, B & Robert, M.D. (2019). Who get helped? The opportunity structure of the college physics classroom, peer instruction and perceptions of help seeking. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 36-44.
    46. Mohd Mahzan Awang, Abdul Razaq Ahmad, & Nur Syazwani Abdul Talib. (2016). Penggunaan multimedia dalam pendidikan sejarah pada abad ke-21 dan hubungannya dengan minat belajar sejarah. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 44-56.
    47. Nazir, S., Naicken, S., & Paterson, J.H. (2019). Teaching data structure through group based collaborative peer interactions. Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC’19) ACM.
    48. Nicol, D.J., & Boyle, J.T. (2010). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.
    49. Nikmah, F., & Ellianawati. (2019). Integrating of peer instruction in the guided inquiry learning model. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 171-182.
    50. Noriati, A. Rashid, Boon, P.Y., & Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2009). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.
    51. NurSyazwani Abdul Talib, Kamarulzaman Abdul Ghani & Nur Azuki Yusuff. (2019). Kaedah pembelajaran sejarah berasaskan lawatan ke muzium. INSANIAH: Online Journal of Language, Communication and Humanities, 2(1), 45-57.
    52. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometrie theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
    53. Oliveira, P.C & Oliveira, C.G. (2013). Using conceptual questions to promote motivation and learning in physics lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 417-424.
    54. Omardin Haji Ashaari & Yunus Muhammad. (1996). Kaedah pengajaran sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publication and Distributor Sdn Bhd.
    55. Pintrich, P., & Schnuk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: theory, research and application. New York: Prentice Hall.
    56. Pratiwi, H.Y., Muhammad, N.H., Asri, M., & Nur Jahan Ahmad. (2019). The impact of guided inquiry model integrated with peer instruction towards sciences process skill and physics learning achievement. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 3(2), 78-85.
    57. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2003). Huraian sukatan pelajaran tingkatan empat. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
    58. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2018). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
    59. Rautianen, M., Raikkonen, E., Veijola, A., & Mikkonen, S. (2019). History teaching in Finnish general upper secondary schools: objectives and practices. History Education Research Journal, 16(2), 291-305.
    60. Rocha, M.J.A.D., & Souza, J.C.D. (2019). Use of clinical cases to teach endocrine physiology by means of peer instruction and via the socrative app. Revista cubana de’investigaciones biomedicas, 38(5), 1-2.
    61. Rossafri Mohamad & Shabariah Mohamad Shariff. (2011). Kesan penggunaan laman web sosial ke atas kaedah perbincangan di dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran mata pelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, 1(1), 75-80.
    62. Rouet, J.F et al. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478-493.
    63. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definition and new direction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
    64. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews of Psychology.
    65. Schmidt, B. (2014). Improving motivation and learning outcomes in a flipped classroom environment. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 3rd-6th December 2014, Dubai, United Arabic Emirates.
    66. Shakila Yacob, Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd Rus, Rosilawati Zainol. (2016). Potensi di luar tempurung: Hala tuju digitalisasi sejarah di Malaysia. Geografilian Online: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(13), 61-73. Retrieved from: www.ejournals.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view16316
    67. Simon, B., Kohanfare, M., Lee, J., & Tamayo, K. (2010). Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. SIGCSE’10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 341-345.
    68. Smith, J. (2016). What remains of history? Historical epistemology and historical understanding in Scotland curriculum for excellence. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 500-517. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (4th Ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    69. Suppiah Nachiappan et al. (2009). Pembelajaran dan perkembangan pelajar. Shah Alam: Oxford Fajar Sdn Bhd.
    70. Tengku Putri Norishah Tengku Shariman & Fadilahwati Abdul Rahman. (2007). Multimedia Storytelling for teaching history: Impact on student learning, motivation and engagement. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention 2007, 2nd-5th November 2007, Sofitel Palm Resort, Senai, Johor Bharu.
    71. VanDen, B. I., Admiral, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcome of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 341-356.
    72. Wangenheim, C.G.V, Alves, N.C., Rotriques, P.E., & Hauck, J.C. (2017). Teaching computing in a multidisciplinary way in social studies classes in school – a case study. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 1(2), 1-14.
    73. Wineburg, S., Smith, M & Breakstone, J. (2018). What is learned in college history classes? Journal of American History, 104(4), 983-993.
    74. Wunder, S. (2002). Learning to teach understanding: preservice teachers at a hands-on museum. The Social Studies, 93, 159-163.
    75. Yao, X et al. (2015). The examining the relations among student motivation, engagement and retention in mooc: a structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), 23-33.