School-based support teams’ trajectories in rural contexts of South Africa: the teachers’ perspectives
List of Authors
  • Omodan, Bunmi Isaiah , Tsotetsi, Cias T.

Keyword
  • School-based support team, Ubuntu, rurality, postgraduate student

Abstract
  • The challenges in the school-based support team members’ execution of their duties have been focusing on their roles as teams and the roles of school management and its teachers in supporting the teams. However, literature is silent about the significance of involving all stakeholders who are at rural campuses and employed by the South African Department of Basic Education. The current paper concentrates on determining the challenges in the implementation of the school- based support team in rural areas, with a view to suggesting solutions. We opted for Ubuntu as a theoretical framework. To complement the conceptualization of the above, group discussion was used to generate data from the selected participants. Fifteen teachers employed by the DoE and enrolled as BEd honours students at a rural campus from one of the universities in South Africa were selected using the convenient selection technique. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data and the findings indicate that implementation is not easy because of the lack of resources; parents are not aware of their children’s disabilities, and a lack of support from the district-based support teams. However, adequate educational resources, a literacy programme for rural dwellers, most especially parents, to enable them to be aware of their responsibilities as parents towards schools and the development of functioning and effective collaborative relationships among all education stakeholder in rural locations were recommended.

Reference
  • 1. Alhojailan, M. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. [online] Semantic Scholar. Available at: https://fac.ksu.edu.sa/sites/default/files/ta_thematic_analysis_dr_mohammed_alhojailan.pd f [Accessed 25 Feb. 2019].
    2. Alvi, M. (2016). A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.1-56.https://mpra.ub.uni muenchen.de/70218/1/MPRA_paper_70218.pdf.
    3. Bolden, R. (2014). Ubuntu. In David Coghlan and Mary Brydon-Miller (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Action Research. London: Sage Publications.
    4. Bondai, B. 2016. Reaffirming Ubuntu/Unhu Mainstreaming In the Education Curricula: Panacea for Sustainable Educational Change in Southern Africa.
    5. Chingos, M. M. & West, M. R. (2010). “Do more effective teachers earn more outside of the classroom? Programme on Education Policy and governance working Paper Series PE-PG 10-02.
    6. Creswell, J.W., Ebersöhn, L., Eloff, I., Ferreira, R., Ivankova, N.V., Jansen, J.D., Nieuwenhuis, J., Pietersen, J. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2016). First steps in research 2nd Kobus Maree Editor Pretoria: Van shaik.
    7. Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2014). Policy on Screening, Identification, Assessment and Support. Pretoria: Government Printer.
    8. Department of Education (DoE). (1995). White Paper on Education and Training. Parliament of the Republic of South Africa, Cape Town.
    9. Department of Education (DoE). (2005). Conceptual and operational guidelines for the implementation of inclusive education: District-Based Support Teams. Pretoria: Government Printer.
    10. Donohue, D. & Bornman, J. (2014). The challenges of realising inclusive education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education: 34(2), 1-14.
    11. El Nokali N. E., Bachman H. J., Votruba-Drzai E. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school, Child development, vol. 81, n. 3, 988-1005.
    12. Escalada M. & Heong K. L. (2014). Focus Group Discussion. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242589494_Focus_Group_Discussion_1. accessed on 5/11/2019.
    13. Etikan I., Musa S. A. & Alkassim R. A. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 5(1); 1-4.
    14. Gade C.B.N. (2012). What is Ubuntu? Different interpretations among South Africans of African Descent. South African J. Philosophy. 31(3): 484-503.
    15. Gaffney, T. (2016). School-based support teams' experiences of the support that they provide within their schools. Master’s thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.
    16. Gaotlhobogwe, M. (2012). The Impact of Lack of Resources on Declining Students’ Enrolments in Design and Technology in Botswana Junior Secondary Schools. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17 (1), 10-17.
    17. George, A. L. and Bennet, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    18. Hlalele, D. & Tsotetsi, C.T. (2016). Promoting student teachers’ adaptive capabilities through community engagement. Perspectives in Education. 34(3): 29-42.
    19. Indoshi, F.C., Wagah, M.O., and Agak, J.O. (2010). Factors That Determine Students’ and Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Art and Design Curriculum. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 2 (1), 9 -17
    20. Jameel, B., Shaheen, S. & Majid, U. (2018). Introduction to Qualitative Research for Novice Investigators. URNCST Journal, 2(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.57
    21. Jeynes, W. H. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. New York: Routledge.
    22. Jojo Z.M. M. (2018). Ubuntu in the transformation of a learning environment for effective geometry teaching. Acad. J. Educ. Res. 6(9): 231-238.
    23. Lefa, B. J. (2015). The African Philosophy of Ubuntu in South African Education. Master’s Degree article Cape Town: Cape Peninsula University of Technology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274374017_The_African_Philosophy_of_Ubunt u_in_South_African_Education/download, 10/05/2019.
    24. Makhalemele, T & Nel, M. (2015). Challenges experienced by district-based support teams in the execution of their functions in a specific South African province. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1079270.
    25. Makoelle, T. M. (2014). School-based Support Teams as Communities of Enquiry: A Case of Developing Inclusive Practices in the Free State Province of South Africa, International Journal of Educational Sciences, 7:1, 67-76, DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2014.11890170.
    26. Masango, M. J. (2013). The roles of the principal and the SBST in supporting teachers teaching inclusive education. Master Thesis, University of Pretoria.
    27. Mautone, J., Marcelle, E., Tresco. K. E. & Power, T. J. (2014). Assessing the Quality of Parent– Teacher Relationships for Students with Adhd. Psychology in the Schools, 00 (00), 1-12. DOI: 10.1002/pits.21817.
    28. Msengana, N. W. (2006). The Significance Of The Concept 'Ubuntu' For Educational Management And Leadership During Democratic Transformation In South Africa. PhD. Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
    29. Mupa, P. & Chinooneka, T. C. (2015). Factors contributing to ineffective teaching and learning in primary schools: Why are schools in decadence?. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 125-134.
    30. Nel, M., P. Engelbrecht, N. M. Nel, and D. Tlale. (2014). “South African Teachers’ Views of Collaboration in Inclusive Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18 (9): 903–917.
    31. Nel, N. M., Tlale, L. D. N., Engelbrecht, P. & Nel. M. (2016). Teacher’s perceptions of educationsupport structures in the implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. Koers (Online), 81 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19108/koers.81.3.2249.
    32. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J. & Mukherjee, N. (2017). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9:20–32.
    33. Ojo, O. J. & Basic Education as a Tool for Promoting National Integration among Children in Rural Basic Schools. Journal of Education Research and Rural Community Development, 1(2), 1-17.
    34. Omodan, B. I. & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2018). Student-Teacher Relationships as Panacea for Students’ Academic Performance in Nigeria Secondary Schools: An Attachment Perspective. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9 (4), 82-101.
    35. Omodan, T. C. & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2019). Framing Ubuntu Philosophy to Reconstruct Principals’ Behaviour and Teachers’ effectiveness in Secondary Schools. Journal of Education Research and Rural Community Development, 1(1), 25-45.
    36. Pirchio, S., Tritrini, Y., Passiatore, C. & Taeschner, T. (2013). The Role of the Relationship between Parents and Educators for Child Behaviour and Wellbeing. International Journal about Parents in Education, 7 (2), 145-155.
    37. Rulwa-Mnatwana, B. (2014). School-Based Support Teams’ Understandings and Experiences of Inclusive Education in the Western Cape. Master Thesis, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
    38. Samkange, W. and Samkange, C. (2013). ‘Philosophies and Perspectives in Education: Examining their Roles and Relevance in Education’. In Greener Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 454-461.
    39. Schoeman, M. (2012). “Developing an Inclusive Education System: Changing Teachers’ Attitudes and Practices through Critical Professional Development.” Paper presented at the National Teacher Development Conference at the University of Pretoria, September 17–19.
    40. Sheridan, S. M., Bovaird, J. A., Glover, T. A., Garbacz, S. A., Witte, A., & Kwon, K. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of the parent-teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41, 23–46.
    41. Shizha, E. (2012). ‘Unhu/Ubuntu and Education for Reconciliation in Zimbabwe’. In Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 7(2), 16-27.
    42. Thomas J, Harden A (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodology, 8: 45-65.
    43. Tutu, D. (2004). God Has a Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time. London: Rider.
    44. Yin, R. K. (1998). The abridged version of case study research: Design and method. In: Bickman, L. and Rog, D. J. (eds.) Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.