Support offered by school-based support teams on curriculum adaptation: experiences of full service schools teachers in a specific district in Gauteng
List of Authors
  • Makhalemele, Thabo , Staden, Isabel Payne-Van

Keyword
  • Curriculum adaptation, full-service school, school-based support team, inclusive education

Abstract
  • This study set out to investigate the experiences of teachers at Full-Service Schools (FSS) with regard to the support offered by a School-Based Support Team (SBST) for curriculum adaptation when addressing barriers to learning. When adapting the curriculum in inclusive schools, the SBST should play an advisory role, as stipulated by the White Paper 6 on inclusive education. The study adopted a qualitative research approach and employed a case study design. Twelve teachers and twenty SBST members from four selected FSSs were interviewed. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants. Data was collected using document analysis and focus group interviews, after which it was analysed thematically. The main findings of the study revealed that the SBSTs clearly understand their role in supporting FSS teachers during curriculum adaptation, but still lack knowledge the knowledge to fulfil this role effectively. It was evident that, in these schools, there is little to no collaboration between the teachers and the SBSTs in terms of sharing ideas for strategies to adapt the curriculum. This article recommends that in order to enable teachers to accommodate learners who experience barriers to learning, the SBST should be adequately trained to develop various strategies to support all teachers in curriculum adaptation, and challenges to support must addressed.

Reference
  • 1. Adewumi, T.M., Rembe, S., Shumba, J. & Akinyemi, A. (2017). Adaptation of the curriculum for the inclusion of learners with special education needs in selected primary schools in the Fort Beaufort District. African Journal of Disability, 6(0): a377. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.377.
    2. Ainscow, M. (2012). Moving knowledge around: Strategies for fostering equity within educational systems. Journal of Educational Change, 13(3), 289–310.
    3. Akar, H. (2016). Case study: Qualitative research designs in education. (In Saban, A. & Ersoy, A. eds. Ankara: Ani.).
    4. Alsubaie, M.A. (2016). Curriculum Development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107.
    5. Alquraini, T. & Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42–59.
    6. Burkhauser, M.A. & Lesaux, N.K. (2017). Exercising a bounded autonomy: novice and experienced teachers’ adaptations to curriculum materials in an age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 291–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1088065.
    7. Bridgre (Linking Innovators in Education). (2014). Disabilities in Education and Inclusive Education. Policy Review and Literature Survey.
    8. Chataika, T., Mckenzie, J.A., Swart, E. & Lyner-Cleophas, M. (2012). Access to education in Africa: Responding to the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with d isabilities. Disability & Society, 27(3), 385-398.
    9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed, 673. New York, NY: Pearson.
    10. Dalton, E.M., Mckenzie, J.N., & Kahonde, C. (2012). The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa: Reflections arising from workshop for teachers and therapists to introduce universal design for learning. African Journal of Disability, 1(1), Art.# 13, 7 pages. http://dox.doc.org/10.4102/ajod.v1i1.13.
    11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024. Department of Education see South Africa. Department of Education.
    12. Dessemontet, R. S., Bless, G., & Morin, D. (2012). Effects of Inclusion on the Academic Achievement and Adaptive Behaviour of Children with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(6), 579–587. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652788.2011.01497.x
    13. Granados, A.C. & Kruse, F. (2011). Implementing changes in the head teacher role: Adaptation of strategic leadership style in inclusive school settings. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7(4), 287-303.
    14. Handler, B. (2010). Teacher as curriculum leader: A consideration of the appropriateness of that role assignment to classroom-based practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 3. ISSN: 1934-9726.
    15. Künsting, J., Neuber, V. & Lipowsky, F. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology Education, 31:299–322.
    16. Kurth, J. & Mastergeorge, A.M. (2010). Individual Education Plan goals and services for adolescents with autism: Impact of age and educational setting. Journal of Special Education, 44(3), 146–160.
    17. Lee, S. H., Wehmeyer, M. L., Soukup, J. H., & Palmer, S. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 213–233.
    18. Lodico, M.G., Spaulding, D.T. & Voegtle, K.H. (2010). Methods in educational research from theory to practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    19. Loreman, T., Deppeler, J. & Harvey, D. 2(010). Inclusive education: supporting diversity in the classroom. London: Routledge.
    20. Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 3351-3514.
    21. Makhalemele, T.J. (2011). The changing role of district-based education support services in establishing the inclusive school settings: an ecosystemic approach. Vanderbijlpark: NWU. (Thesis – PhD).
    22. Makhalemele, T.J. & Payne-Van Staden, I. (2018). Enhancing teachers’ self-efficacy within full service schools: A disregarded aspect by the district-based support team. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(9), 983-996. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1413687.
    23. Mashau, S., Steyn, E.S., Van der Walt, J. & Wolhunter, C. (2008). Support services perceived necessary for learner relationships by Limpopo educators. South African Journal of Education, 28, 415-430.
    24. Meidl, T. & Meidl, C. (2011). Curriculum integration and adaptation: Individualizing pedagogy for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-30. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/.
    25. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    26. Molapo, M.R. & Pillay, V. (2018). Politicising curriculum implementation: The case of primary schools. South African Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-9. Art. # 1428, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1428.
    27. Motitswe, J. (2014). The role of institute level support teams on addressing barriers to learning and provide support in schools: Are they functional? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 259-264.
    28. Nel, M., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, N., & Tlale, D. (2013). South African teachers’ views of collaboration within inclusive education system. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(9), 903-917.
    29. Nel, N.M., Tlale, L.D.N., Engelbrecht, P. & Nel, M. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of education support structures in the implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. KOERS: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 81(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.81.3.2249
    30. Nieuwenhuis, J. (2010). Qualitative research design and data gathering techniques. (In Maree, K., ed. First steps in research. Pretoria: Van Schaik. p. 69-97).
    31. Odom, S.L., Buysse, V. & Soukakou, E. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities a quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 344–356. (2) (PDF) Adaptation of the curriculum for the inclusion of learners with special education needs in selected primary schools in the Fort Beaufort District. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320338765_Adaptation_of_the_curriculum_for _the_inclusion_of_learners_with_special_education_needs_in_selected_primary_schools _in_the_Fort_Beaufort_District [accessed Dec 10 2019].
    32. Oliva, D.V. (2016). Barriers and resources to learning and participation of inclusive students. Psicologia USP, 27(3), 492-502.
    33. Richards J.C. & Rodgers T.S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
    34. Reis, S.M., McCoach, D.B., Little, C.A., Muller, L.M. & Kaniskan, R.B., (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 462–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382891.
    35. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2014). Policy on screening, identification, assessment and support. Pretoria.
    36. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2017). Responding to Diversity in Grade R to 9: Practical approaches to English & Mathematics curriculum differentiation–participants manual. Pretoria.
    37. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2001). Education white paper 6: special needs education, building an inclusive education and training system. Pretoria.
    38. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2005a). Conceptual and operational guidelines for the implementation of inclusive education: Special schools as resource centres. Pretoria.
    39. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2005b). Conceptual and operational guidelines for the implementation of inclusive education: district-based support teams. Pretoria.
    40. South Africa. Department of Basic Education. (2007). Guidelines to ensure quality education and support in special schools and special school resource centres. Pretoria.
    41. Strydom, H. & Venter, L. (2002). Sampling and sampling methods. (In De Vos, A.S. ed. Research at grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik. p. 192-203).
    42. Wium, A.M. & Louw, B. (2013). Revisiting the roles and responsibilities of SLTs in South African schools. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 60:31–37. DOI: 10.7196/SAJCD.247.
    43. Wium, A. & Louw, B. (2015). The South African national school curriculum: Implications for collaboration between teachers and speech-language therapists working in schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), 19-41.
    44. Wood, L. & Olivier, T. (2010). Increasing the self-efficacy beliefs of life orientation teachers: An evaluation. Faculty of Education Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 161–179. Available: Academic Search Premier. http://www-sa.ebsco.com. Date of access: 15 Sep. 2019.
    45. Zhang, J., Wong, L., Chan, T. & Chiu, C. (2014). Curriculum adaptation in special schools for students with intellectual disabilities (SID): A case study of project learning in one SID school in Hong Kong. Front. Educ. China, 9(2), 250-273.