Board characteristics, firm characteristics, technological innovation and manufacturing firm performance: Conceptual paper
List of Authors
  • Hashim, F. , Hussain, S.

Keyword
  • Board Characteristics, Firm Characteristics, Technological Innovation, Firm Performance and Manufacturing

Abstract
  • This paper aims to study a potential interrelationship between board characteristics, firm characteristics, technological innovation, and firm performance in the manufacturing sector. The paper is a conceptual paper. It offers a brief review of the literature regarding on these four variables. This study intends to employ a quantitative research approach in determining the determinants of firm performance. Several methods including online and offline material from article journals, books and industrial reports are used to collect and analyzed the literature. This study is grounded on RBV theory. The theoretical argument and literature findings indicate that viewing the firm performance from the perspective of internal sources by incorporating the three determinants, which include board characteristics, firm characteristics, and technological innovation, has the potential to improve manufacturing firm performance. This study reveals that there have been very limited studies have combined the three internal determinants of firm performance such as board characteristics, firm characteristics, and technological innovation on firm performance. As a result of focusing on internal firm resources, the framework will provide a greater emphasis on strategic sources that the firm owns and can fully utilize in order to improve the Malaysian manufacturing firm performance. Therefore, this warrants more investigation, and future studies are needed to further analyze the proposed framework.

Reference
  • 1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87.

    2. Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 574–595.

    3. Akhtar, S., Akhtar, F., John, K., & Wong, S. W. (2019). Multinationals’ tax evasion: A financial and governance perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 57, 35–62.

    4. Al Lawati, H., & Hussainey, K. (2021). Do overlapped audit committee directors affect tax avoidance?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 487.

    5. Aliani, K., & Zarai, M. A. (2012). Demographic diversity in the board and corporate tax planning in American firms. Business Management and Strategy, 3(1), 72–86.

    6. Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics, 2(3), 370–374.

    7. Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications.

    8. Annisa, N. A., & Kurniasih, L. (2012). Pengaruh corporate governance terhadap tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing, 8(2), 123–136.

    9. Annuar, H. A., Salihu, I. A., & Obid, S. N. S. (2014). Corporate ownership, governance and tax avoidance: An interactive effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 150–160.

    10. Arismajayanti, N. P. A., & Jati, I. K. (2017). Influence of audit committee competence, audit committee independence, independent commissioner and leverage on tax aggressiveness. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 5(2), 109–119.

    11. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    12. Barros, V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). Board meeting attendance and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from the UK. Business Perspectives and Research, 8(1), 51–66.

    13. Baxter, P., & Cotter, J. (2009). Audit committees and earnings quality. Accounting & Finance, 49(2), 267–290.

    14. Bayar, O., Huseynov, F., & Sardarli, S. (2018). Corporate Governance, Tax Avoidance, and Financial Constraints. Financial Management, 47(3), 651–677.

    15. Beasley, M. S., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 539–570.

    16. Beer, S., De Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 660–688.

    17. Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. N. (2007). Agency theory and corporate governance: A study of the effectiveness of board in their monitoring of the CEO. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(1), 7–23.

    18. Boussaidi, A., & Hamed-Sidhom, M. (2021). Board’s characteristics, ownership’s nature and corporate tax aggressiveness: New evidence from the Tunisian context. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(4), 487–511.

    19. Brown, I., Steen, A., & Foreman, J. (2009). Risk management in corporate governance: A review and proposal. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 546–558.

    20. Chen, K. P., & Chu, C. C. (2005). Internal control versus external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 151–164.

    21. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.

    22. Chen, Z., Cheok, C. K., & Rasiah, R. (2016). Corporate tax avoidance and performance: Evidence from China’s listed companies. Institutions and Economies, 8(3), 61–83.

    23. Conger, J. A., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E. (1998). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 76, 136–149.

    24. Crocker, K. J., & Slemrod, J. (2005). Corporate tax evasion with agency costs. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9-10), 1593–1610.

    25. Damayanty, P., & Putri, T. (2021). The effect of corporate governance on tax avoidance by company size as the moderating variable. ICoSMI 2020, Indonesia.

    26. Dang, V. C., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Audit committee characteristics and tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 1–15.

    27. Deloitte., L. L. P. (2011). Audit committee brief: Tax complexities drive audit committee oversight.

    28. Deloitte, L. L. P. (2013). Audit committee brief: Top issues for audit committees in 2014.

    29. Deloitte, L. L. P. (2014). Audit committee brief: What’s on your agenda for 2015.

    30. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179.

    31. Desai, M. A., Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 591–623.

    32. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009a). Earnings management, corporate tax shelters, and book-tax alignment. National Tax Journal, 62(1), 169–186.

    33. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009b). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546.

    34. Deslandes, M., Fortin, A., & Landry, S. (2020). Audit committee characteristics and tax aggressiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 272–293.

    35. Dewi, N. N., & Jati, I. K. (2014). The effect of executive character, company characteristics, and good corporate governance dimensions on tax avoidance on the Indonesia stock exchange. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 6(2), 249–260.

    36. Dhaliwal, D. S., Gleason, C. A., & Mills, L. F. (2004). Last-chance earnings management: Using the tax expense to meet analysts’ forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 431–459.

    37. Ernst & Young LLP. (2014). Staying on course. A guide for audit committees. Ernst & Young Global Limited, UK.

    38. Feng, H., Habib, A., & Tian, G. L. (2019). Aggressive tax planning and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(5), 829–857.

    39. Frank, M. M., & Rego, S. O. (2006). Do managers use the valuation allowance account to manage earnings around certain earnings targets?. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 28(1), 43–65.

    40. Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496.

    41. Fuest, C., & Riedel, N. (2009). Tax evasion, tax avoidance and tax expenditures in developing countries: A review of the literature. Report prepared for the UK Department for International Development (DFID), 44.

    42. García-Meca, E., Ramón-Llorens, M. C., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2021). Are narcissistic CEOs more tax aggressive? The moderating role of internal audit committees. Journal of Business Research, 129, 223–235.

    43. Goh, B. W., Lee, J., Lim, C. Y., & Shevlin, T. (2016). The effect of corporate tax avoidance on the cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1647–1670.

    44. Gupta, S., & Lynch, D. P. (2016). The effects of changes in state tax enforcement on corporate income tax collections. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 38(1), 125–143.

    45. Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1–34.

    46. Halioui, K., Neifar, S., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2016). Corporate governance, CEO compensation and tax aggressiveness: Evidence from American firms listed on the NASDAQ 100. Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 445–462.

    47. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127–178.

    48. Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 126–141.

    49. Hoseini, M., Gerayli, M. S., & Valiyan, H., (2019). Demographic characteristics of the board of directors’ structure and tax avoidance: Evidence from Tehran stock exchange. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(2), 199–212.

    50. Hsu, P. H., Moore, J. A., & Neubaum, D. O. (2018). Tax avoidance, financial experts on the audit committee, and business strategy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(9-10), 1293–1321.

    51. Huang, W., Ying, T., & Shen, Y. (2018). Executive cash compensation and tax aggressiveness of Chinese firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1151–1180.

    52. Hundal, S. (2011). Why tax avoidance is among the biggest issues of our generation. Liberal Conspiracy.

    53. Ichord Jr, R. F. (2020). Transforming the power sector in developing countries: Geopolitics, poverty, and climate change in Bangladesh. Atlantic Council, Global Energy Center.

    54. Inekwe, M. (2021). The likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting among listed companies in Nigeria: Application of the fraud triangle theory, Doctoral Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    55. Jamei, R. (2017). Tax avoidance and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from Tehran stock exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 638–644.

    56. Kadir, O. A. (2018). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on corporate tax avoidance in Nigerian listed manufacturing companies. Global Journal of Contemporary Research in Accounting, Auditing and Business Ethics, 4(1), 622–636.

    57. Kallamu, B. S., & Saat, N. A. M. (2015). Audit committee attributes and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian finance companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3), 206–231.

    58. Khaoula, F., & Moez, D. (2019). The moderating effect of the board of directors on firm value and tax planning: Evidence from European listed firms. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(4), 331–343.

    59. Kim, J. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569.

    60. Kovermann, J., & Velte, P. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100270.

    61. Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50–70.

    62. Law, S. H. (2018). Applied panel data analysis: Short panels. UPM Press, Serdang.

    63. Lisic, L. L. (2014). Auditor-provided tax services and earnings management in tax expense: The importance of audit committees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 340–366.

    64. Mashaykhi, B., & Seyyedi, S. J. (2015). Corporate governance and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 6(20), 83–103.

    65. Mohanadas, N. D., Salim, A. S. A., & Pheng, L. K. (2020). CSR and tax aggressiveness of Malaysian listed companies: Evidence from an emerging economy. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 597–612.

    66. Neifar, S., & Utz, S. (2019). The effect of earnings management and tax aggressiveness on shareholder wealth and stock price crash risk of German companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(1), 94–119.

    67. Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Audit committee structure, institutional quality, and bank stability: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102369.

    68. Nguyen, Q. K. (2021). Oversight of bank risk-taking by audit committees and Sharia committees: Conventional vs Islamic banks. Heliyon, 7(8), e07798.

    69. Nguyen, Q. K., & Dang, V. C. (2019). Audit committee structure and bank stability in Vietnam. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 8, 240–255.

    70. Noor, R. M., Mastuki, N., & Bardai, B. (2009). Book-tax difference and value relevance of taxable income: Malaysian evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting, 7(2), 19–40.

    71. Oussii, A. A., & Taktak, N. B. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness and financial reporting timeliness: The case of Tunisian listed companies. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 9(1), 34–55.

    72. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95.

    73. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2021). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522–534.

    74. Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68–88.

    75. Riguen, R., Salhi, B., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Do women in board represent less corporate tax avoidance? A moderation analysis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(1/2), 114–132.

    76. Roberts, J. (2005). Agency theory, ethics and corporate governance. In Corporate Governance: Does Any Size Fit?. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    77. Salhi, B., Riguen, R., Kachouri, M., & Jarboui, A. (2020). The mediating role of corporate social responsibility on the relationship between governance and tax avoidance: UK common law versus French civil law. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1149–1168.

    78. Sandy, S., & Lukviarman, N. (2015). Pengaruh corporate governance terhadap tax avoidance: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 85–98.

    79. Slemrod, J. (2004). The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal, 57(4), 877–899.

    80. Tandean, V. A., & Winnie, W. (2016). The effect of good corporate governance on tax avoidance: An empirical study on manufacturing companies listed in IDX period 2010-2013. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1), 28–38.

    81. Tanimura, J. K., & Okamoto, M. G. (2013). Reputational penalties in Japan: Evidence from corporate scandals. Asian Economic Journal, 27(1), 39–57.

    82. Vacca, A., Iazzi, A., Vrontis, D., & Fait, M. (2020). The role of gender diversity on tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Sustainability, 12(5), 2007.

    83. Wang, F., Xu, S., Sun, J., & Cullinan, C. P. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 793–811.

    84. Wang, J., Zhang, T. X., & Hao, D. Y. (2014). The value effect of corporate tax avoidance on Chinese listed companies based on proxy agent framework. Securities Market Herald, 24(9), 52–60.

    85. Wilde, J. H., & Wilson, R. J. (2018). Perspectives on corporate tax planning: Observations from the past decade. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2), 63–81.

    86. Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969–999.

    87. Wiratmoko, S. (2018). The effect of corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance on tax avoidance. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 8(2), 241–253.

    88. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

    89. Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277–300.

    90. Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.

    91. Zhang, Y., Farrell, K. A., & Brown, T. A. (2008). Ex-dividend day price and volume: The case of 2003 dividend tax cut. National Tax Journal, 61(1), 105–127.

    92. Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 119–149.