Hubungan kekeluargaan dalam menentukan kejayaan atau kegagalan bekas banduan dalam proses integrasi semula
List of Authors
  • Mohammad Nurhafiz Hassim , Mohd Alif Jasni , Norruzeyati Che Mohd Nasir

Keyword
  • Faktor protektif, faktor risiko, bekas banduan, penolakan keluarga, dan penerimaan keluarga

Abstract
  • Hubungan kekeluargaan merupakan salah satu faktor risiko dan protektif yang menentukan sama ada menggalakkan bekas banduan mengulanglaku jenayah (residivisme) atau menjauhkan diri daripada melakukan semula jenayah (desistance). Faktor hubungan keluarga ini berinteraksi dalam mempengaruhi tingkahlaku mengulangi perbuatan jenayah atau menjauhkan diri daripada melakukan semula jenayah di kalangan bekas penjenayah. Atas kepentingan ini, analisis yang memberi tumpuan kepada interaksi antara penolakan keluarga sebagai faktor risiko dan penerimaan keluarga sebagai faktor pelindung yang wujud di dalam ekologi sosial bekas banduan. Satu kajian kualitatif telah dilakukan dalam kalangan bekas banduan yang telah dibebaskan bagi meneliti faktor anteseden hubungan kekeluargaan yang mempengaruhi keputusan mereka untuk sama ada mengulang-laku jenayah ataupun menjauhkan diri daripada mengulang-laku jenayah. Kajian memperlihatkan hubungan keluarga telah menjadi penyumbang penting kepada kecederungan bekas banduan untuk sama ada terlibat semula di dalam aktiviti-aktiviti jenayah atau tidak. Pemahaman yang kritikal terhadap faktor-faktor hubungan kekeluargaan berupaya membekalkan maklumat yang realistik dalam menjelaskan tentang pengulangan yang berlaku di kalangan bekas banduan.

Reference
  • 1. Altschuler, D & Brash, R. (2004). Adolescent and teenage offenders confronting the challenges and opportunities of reentry. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(1): 72-87.
    2. Andrew, D. & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle in case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50: 88-100.
    3. Berg, M. & Huebner, B. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2): 382-410.
    4. Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places and poor health: The mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science and Medicine, 52: 1501–1516.
    5. Cochran, J. (2014). Breaches in the wall: Imprisonment, social support, and recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(3): 200-229.
    6. Davis, C., Bahr, S.J & Ward, C. (2012). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(4): 446- 469.
    7. diZerega, M & Agudelo, V. (2011). Piloting A Tool For Reentry: A Promising Approach To Engaging Family Members. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
    8. diZerega, M., Carter, M & Giguere, R. (2010). Engaging Offenders’ Families In Reentry. Washington, D.C.: Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice.
    9. Gill, O, & Tranter, L (2012). Family Support for Children and Families Affected by Imprisonment: A Handbook for Families First Services In Wales. Barkingside: Barnardo’s. Glover, J., Nicholson, D., Hemmati, T., Bernfeld, G & Quinsey, V. (2002). A comparison of predictors of general and violent recidivism among high risk federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29: 235–249.
    10. Haerle, D. (2014). Impact of a violent offender treatment program on juvenile recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(1): 3-25.
    11. Jabatan Penjara Malaysia (2017). Jumlah banduan pengulanglaku jenayah, 2000-2016. Diakses pada 25 Mei 2017 dari Unit Sistem Maklumat: http://www.prison.gov.my/portal/page/portal/biru/kepenjaraan
    12. LaVigne, N. & Cowan, J. (2005). Mapping Prisoner Reentry: An Action Research Guidebook. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.
    13. La Vigne, N., Visher, C & Castro, J. (2004). Chicago Prisoners: Experiences Returning Home. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
    14. Laub, J & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys To Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    15. Lopoo, L. M & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation of stability in marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67: 721–34.
    16. Malik-Kane, K & Visher, C. (2008). Health and Prisoner Reentry: How Physical, Mental, and Substance Abuse Conditions Shape The Process of Reintegration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
    17. Mears, D & Mestre, J. (2012). Prisoner reentry, employment, signaling, and the better identification of desisters: Introduction to the special issue. Criminology and Public Policy, 11(1): 5-15.
    18. Naser, R & Visher, C. (2006). Family members experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review, 7(2): 20–31.
    19. Sanei, M. & Mir-Khalili, S.M (2015). Factors affecting recidivism and return to prison male prisoners in the prisons of the west of Guilan and strategies for prevention. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2(2): 156-161.
    20. Schirmer, S., Nellis, A & Mauer, M. (2009). Incarcerated Parents and Their Children: Trends 1991-2007. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
    21. Smith, R, Grimshaw, R, Romeo, R & Knapp, M (2007). Poverty and Disadvantage Among Prisoners’ Families. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
    22. Visher, C., Kachnowski, V., LaVigne, N., & Travis, J. (2004). Baltimore Prisoners' Experiences Returning Home. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
    23. Wildeman, C & Western, B. (2010). Incarceration in Fragile Families. The Future of Children, 20, 157–77.