The notion of multivalence by Charles Jencks and Kisho Kurokawa – comparison through methods of ‘Abstract Representation’ and ‘Abstract Symbolism’
List of Authors
  • Michael, Gilbert , Naziaty Mohd Yaacob , Zuraini Md Ali

Keyword
  • Multivalence, Abstract Representation, Abstract Symbolism, post-modern architecture, Charles Jencks, Kisho Kurokawa

Abstract
  • One of the solutions presented in response to the various limitations of the Modernist dogma was the notion of ‘Multivalence’. In the 1960’s various methods related to this were debated and suggested with the underlying motives for architecture to counter Modernist’s puritanism and express the plurality and diversity of society. This paper aims to compare different themes discussed on this topic by two of its representative protagonists, Charles Jencks in the West and Kisho Kurokawa in the Far-East. Through a review in particular of their respective methods of ‘Abstract Representation’ and ‘Abstract Symbolism’, it will be argued that despite sharing similar conclusions, both their approach simultaneously illustrate contrasting world views.

Reference
  • 1. Alston, E. (2018), The Thematic House by Charles Jencks, available at https://www.museandmaker.com/architecture/2018/7/6/the-thematic-house-by-charles jencks (accessed 18 September 2019).
    2. Castellano, A. (1998), “La forme de l'architecture a venir”, in Asahi Shimbun (Ed.). Retrospective Kurokawa Kisho, Asahi Shimbun, Japan, pp. 367-370.
    3. Farrel, T. (2018), Thematic House, London recognised with Grade I historic listing, available at https://farrells.com/news_item/thematic-house-grade-1-listing (accessed 18 September 2019).
    4. Frampton, K. (1995, summer), “The five voices of Kisho Kurokawa”, The Japan Architect, 18 summer,1995-2, pp. 14-19.
    5. Goldberg, M. (2017), Maggie's Centre founder Charles Jencks to open his house as a museum, available at https://archinect.com/news/article/150042272/maggie-s-centre-founder- charles-jencks-to-open-his-house-as-a-museum (accessed 18 September 2019).
    6. Guermazi, I. (2014), An Archeology of Postmodern Architecture: A reading of Charles Jencks’ Work, University of Washington, Washington.
    7. Jencks, C. (1983), Abstract Representation, St. Martin’s Press, New York. Jencks, C. (1985), Towards a Symbolic Architecture: The Thematic House, Academy Editions, UK.
    8. Jencks, C. (1989), “Introduction” in Kisho Kurokawa 1978-1989, Kajima Institute Publishing, Tokyo.
    9. Jencks, C. (1991), “Introduction” in Intercultural Architecture, Academy Editions, London.
    10. Jencks, C. (2002), The New Paradigm in Architecture, Yale University Press, New Haven.
    11. Jencks, C; Julius, C. (2011), Status symbols: Charles Jencks' townhouse embraces postmodernism, kitsch and theory, accessible at http://www.independent.co.uk/property/house-and- home/status-symbols-charles-jencks-townhouse-embraces-postmodernism-kitsch-and- theory-of-quotcosmic-2366758.html (accessed 18 September 2019).
    12. Jencks, C. & Gibert, M. (2013), “Interview with Charles Jencks”, unpublished manuscript, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
    13. Kurokawa, K. (1982), Kisho Kurokawa architecture et design, Editions du moniteur, Paris.
    14. Kurokawa, K. (1986). Process no66: Kisho Kurokawa. Recent works and projects, Process Architecture co, Tokyo.
    15. Kurokawa, K. (1988), Rediscovering Japanese space, Weather Hill, New York.
    16. Kurokawa, K. (1989), Kisho Kurokawa 1978-1989, Kajima Institute Publishing, Tokyo.
    17. Kurokawa, K. (1991) Intercultural Architecture, Academy editions, London.
    18. Kurokawa, K. (1996), “The universe and abstract geometry”, in L’Arca Edizioni (Ed.), Kisho Kurokawa, abstract symbolism, L’Arca Edizioni, Milan, pp. 13-28.
    19. Kurokawa, K. (2006a), From the age of machine to age of life, in L’Arca International 219, L’Arca International, Monaco, pp. 2-11.
    20. Kurokawa, K. (2006b). Critique of popular formalism, available at http://www.kisho.co.jp/page.php/294 (accessed 18 September 2019).
    21. Kurokawa, K. (2006c), From the age of the machine to the age of life – Can modern architecture since the 1960’s become a movement that causes a paradigm shift? in Global Architect No. 082, Global Architect, Tokyo.