The university students’ perception towards the use of Kadazandusun language in Malaysia
List of Authors
  • Alice Alim Yukin , Soon Chiow Thai

Keyword
  • Kadazandusun language, language ideology, language management, language practice, Theory of Language Management

Abstract
  • The Kadazandusun language is the language of the largest indigenous groups in Sabah, Malaysia. This study applied Spolsky’s theory of language management (2004, 2009) to study the perception of the university students towards the usage of Kadazandusun language in Malaysia. The language ideology, language practice and language management are three important independent and interrelated components in theory of language management (Spolsky, 2009). One of the local universities in Malaysia served as the research site of the study. A survey using e-questionnaire was conducted. 37 year-one undergraduate students were the respondents of the study. The findings of the study showed that: i) more than 80 percent of the students would like to learn the languages from oversea ii) about 80 percent of student respondents perceived the Kadazandusun language as the language reflecting the Kadazandusun’s ethnicity identity, iii) by learning the Kadazandusun language will ease the respondents to interact with Kadazandusun communities and iv) the Kadazandusun language is most used as the verbal communication language in the public domain. The researchers of the study suggest that the visibility of the written Kadazandusun language to be improved to upgrade the use of written language in the country.

Reference
  • 1. Christinus, M.C., Albert, M.G. and Ali, Shireen. (2020). The Kadazandusun Language. In Baskaran, S. Y. and Rozelle, V (Eds.). Medium. Retrieved from https://komuhakan.medium.com 2. Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2016). Conflicting language ideologies and contradictory language practices in Singaporean multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7), 694-709. 3. Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2018). Family language policy. In J. Tollefson, M. Perez-Milans (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning, pp. 420-442. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 4. Dubois, S. and Horvath, B. (2000). When the music changes, you change too: Gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation Change. Vol. 11, 287-313. 5. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). (2024). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 27th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.com. 6. Fasold, R.W. (1996). The Sociolinguistics of Society: Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Volume I. USA: Blackwell. 7. Fasold, R.W. (1999). The Sociolinguistics of Language: Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Volume II. USA: Blackwell. 8. Lamberti, L. (2024). Language ideologies and dialect shift in Helvécian Portuguese. Sociolinguistica. Vol.38(1), 77-103. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2023-0024. 9. Mohd Khairy Abdullah. (April 25, 2024). Teaching of KadazanDusun: Study on adding other dialects. Daily Express. Retrieved from https://www.dailyexpress.com.my 10. Sheikh, R.A and Khan, A. A. (2024). Family Language Policy in Multilingual Families in Lahore: An application of Spolsky’s Model. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review. Vol.8 (3), 492-501. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-III)45. 11. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 12. Spolsky, B. (2009). Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 13. Spolsky, B. (2021). Rethinking language policy. UK: Edinburgh University Press. 14. UN General Assembly. (2019). Rights of indigenous peoples. Report of the Third Committee. https://undocs.org/A/74/396. 15. Woolard, K.A and Schieffelin, B.B. (1994). Language Ideology. Journal of Annual Review of Anthoropology. Vol. 23 (pp. 55-82). Retrieve from https://files.nyu. edu/bs4/public/Bambi--Website_Assets/BBS%20PDFs.