Sociocultural theory in blended learning: Enhancing EFL proficiency among primary school learners
List of Authors
  • Huzaina Abdul Halim , Zihe Wu

Keyword
  • Sociocultural Theory, Blended Learning, EFL Proficiency, Scaffolding, Peer Collaboration

Abstract
  • This study investigates how integrating Sociocultural Theory (SCT) into a blended learning framework can enhance English as a Foreign Language (EFL) proficiency among primary school learners in China. SCT highlights the significance of social interactions, scaffolding, and cultural tools in language development. Using a quasi-experimental design, the study involved 220 students, who were divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group participated in an SCT-enhanced blended learning environment, while the control group received traditional teacher-directed instruction. Quantitative data were gathered through pre- and post-tests measuring reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills. Results from ANCOVA analysis indicated that the experimental group showed significantly greater improvements, especially in speaking and listening skills, compared to the control group. In addition, qualitative data from classroom observations and student interviews revealed that peer collaboration, teacher scaffolding, and the use of culturally relevant materials were key factors in supporting language learning. These findings suggest that incorporating SCT into blended learning can substantially improve EFL proficiency. The study provides useful insights for educators and curriculum developers looking to integrate more effective teaching strategies into language education.

Reference
  • 1. Ai-min, L. (2013). The study of second language acquisition under socio-cultural theory. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(5), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-5-3 2. Al-Huneidi, A., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education. In Information Systems, E-learning, and Knowledge Management Research: 4th World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2011, Mykonos, Greece, September 21-23, 2011. Revised Selected Papers 4 (pp. 581-591). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35879-1_74 3. Al-Manafi, A., Osman, S., Magableh, I., & Alghatani, R. (2023). The effect of blended learning on the primary stage EFL students’ reading comprehension achievement in libya. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16237a 4. Amelia, R., Rofiki, I., Tortop, H., & Abah, J. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ scientific explanation with e-scaffolding in blended learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.5091 5. Awadelkarim, A. (2021). An analysis and insight into the effectiveness of scaffolding: EFL instructors’/teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 828-841. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.58 6. Benhadj, Y. (2021). A quasi-experimental study on the impact of blendedlearning on EFL students’ language proficiency. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(3), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i3.668 7. Bhunia, R. (2023). Awareness of secondary school teachers towards blended teaching-learning. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(8), 1021-1026. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.202308128 8. Bi, L. (2023, February). Application of Vygotsky’s SCT in Chinese EFL Classroom. In 2022 4th International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2022) (pp. 891-900). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-97-8_113 9. Chen, J. (2022). Scaffolding in an elementary-level Japanese language classroom question-answer interactions. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 10(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2022-0002 10. Darma, I., Karma, I., & Santiana, I. (2019). The development of blended learning model in applied mathematics by using lms schoology. International Research Journal of Engineering It & Scientific Research, 5(6), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n6.798 11. Darong, H. (2022). Empirical evidence of blended learning in indonesian EFL class. Jeels (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 9(1), 115-147. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v9i1.3957 12. Ehsanifard, E., Ghapanchi, Z., & Afsharrad, M. (2020). The impact of blended learning on speaking ability and engagement. The Journal of AsiatEFL, 17(1), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatEFL.2020.17.1.17.253 13. Febrianto, A. (2019). Teachers’ and student’s scaffolding in second language learning. Edulink Education and Linguistics Knowledge Journal, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.32503/edulink.v1i2.604 14. Frederick, K., Havrda, D., Scott, D., Gatwood, J., Hall, E., & Desselle, S. (2023). Assessing student perceptions of blended and online learning courses in pharmacoeconomics, management, and leadership. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 87(4), ajpe9001. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe9001 15. Govindan, S., Singh, H., Ling, L., & Sekar, M. (2023). Effect of blended self-directed learning on nursing students: quasi-experimental approach. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_209_23 16. Hua, M. (2024). The impact of self-directed learning experience and course experience on learning satisfaction of university students in blended learning environments: the mediating role of deep and surface learning approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1278827 17. Maciejewski, M. L. (2020). Quasi-experimental design. Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 4(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1477468 18. Newman, S. (2018). Vygotsky, wittgenstein, and sociocultural theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12174 19. Noursi, O. (2020). The impact of blended learning on the twelfth grade students’ English language proficiency. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 508-518. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.32 20. Oktavianti, E., Handayanto, S., Wartono, W., & Saniso, E. (2018). Students’ scientific explanation in blended physics learning with e-scaffolding. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 7(2), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14232 21. Pathan, H., Memon, R., Memon, S., Khoso, A., & Bux, I. (2018). A critical review of vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory in second language acquisition. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 232. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p232 22. Ponomarenko, O. and Petrova, T. (2022). Modern tools for creative learning of English in a blended learning environment: practices of ukrainian universities. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 7(4), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp.7(4).2021.50-57 23. Sugianto, H. (2021). Exploring a rural English teacher’s lived experiences of assessment practices in a blended learning enactment: a narrative inquiry. English Linguistics Research, 10(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v10n4p42 24. Tomak, B. (2022). Cultural and sociocultural elements of language learning for the turkish learners of English in two different universities. Opus Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 19(45), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062860 25. Uz, R. and Uzun, A. (2018). The influence of blended learning environment on self-regulated and self-directed learning skills of learners. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-7-2018(volume7-issue4.html), 877-886. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.877 26. Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e16504. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504 27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 28. Yu, W. and Du, X. (2019). Implementation of a blended learning model in content- based EFL curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 14(05), 188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.8546 29. Yudhana, S. (2021). The implementation of blended learning to enhance English reading skills of thai undergraduate students. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p1 30. Zhang, S. and Soon, G. (2023). Student number size as moderator in affecting the four factors of students’ perceived engagement in task-based learning under blended English learning environment. International Journal of Education & Technology, 1(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.59021/ijetech.v1i1.15