This study assesses the efficacy of client counselling assessments, utilising a rubric evaluation, in enhancing the practical legal skills of Part 2 foundation law students in Malaysia. The faculty wants to prepare students for problem questions on contract and tort law tests. They use role-playing to teach legal principles by acting out different types of contracts or tort crimes. Student groups employ the ILAC (Issue, Law, Application, Conclusion) framework to identify issues, select appropriate laws, and demonstrate application through structured conclusions. The evaluation utilised a rubric to identify problems, apply relevant legal principles, write quality, and foster teamwork. Results indicate that most groups scored between 10 and 13 out of 15 marks, demonstrating a solid grasp of legal concepts with areas for improvement identified. The study emphasises the critical role of hands-on, scenario-based learning in legal education and recommends continued use of practical assessments to prepare students for examination success and a successful transition into law faculty. Through this approach, students develop improved legal reasoning and teamwork skills. These findings advocate for integrating more interactive and practical learning experiences in the legal curriculum, fostering a more active and enjoyable learning environment in law schools. In conclusion, client counselling assessments employing the ILAC framework contribute to developing the foundational legal skills necessary for a deeper understanding of legal principles among law students.