Izhar Hafifi Zainal Abidin , Mohd Onn Rashdi Abd Patah

Trustworthiness, Credibility, Dependability, Transferability, Confirmability

1. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2(January), 0–3. 2. Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620 3. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870 4. Candela, A. G. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726 5. Carcary, M. (2020). The Research Audit Trail: Methodological Guidance for Application in Practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008 6. Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 7. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness_in_qualitative.PDF. In MedSurg Nursing (Vol. 25, Issue 6, pp. 435–436). 8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design (International Student Edition): Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=UgFIMQAACAAJ 9. Cutcliffe, J. R., & McKenna, H. P. (2004). Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02874.x 10. Erdmann, A., & Potthoff, S. (2023). Decision Criteria for the Ethically Reflected Choice of a Member Check Method in Qualitative Research: A Proposal for Discussion. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231177664 11. Findley, M. G., Kikuta, K., & Denly, M. (2021). External Validity. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 365–393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102556 12. Florczak, K. L. (2022). Best Available Evidence or Truth for the Moment: Bias in Research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 35(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184211051350 13. Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin's Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/josc.2018.10.1.02 14. Janesick, V. J. (2015). Peer Debriefing. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp014.pub2 15. Johnson, B. D., Dunlap, E., & Benoit, E. (2010). Structured qualitative research: Organising "mountains of words" for data analysis, both qualitative and quantitative. National Insitute of Health, 45(5), 648–670. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826081003594757. 16. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092 17. Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890 18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry / Yvonna S. Lincoln, Egon G. Guba (E. G. Guba (ed.)). Sage Publications. 19. Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalisation. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000173 20. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320(7226), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 21. Mckim, C. (2023). Meaningful Member-Checking: A Structured Approach to Member- Checking. 7(2), 41–52. 22. McMahon, S. A., & Winch, P. J. (2018). Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research. BMJ Global Health, 3(5), e000837. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000837 23. Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. In PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning (Vol. 4, pp. 51–60). 24. Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145 25. Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054 26. Nyirenda, L., Kumar, M. B., Theobald, S., Sarker, M., Simwinga, M., Kumwenda, M., Johnson, C., Hatzold, K., Corbett, E. L., Sibanda, E., & Taegtmeyer, M. (2020). Using research networks to generate trustworthy qualitative public health research findings from multiple contexts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0895-5 27. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287 28. Palaganas, E. C., Sanchez, M. C., Molintas, M. V. P., & Caricativo, R. D. (2017). Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. Qualitative Report, 22(2), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2552 29. Patnaik, E. (2013). Reflexivity: Situating the researcher in qualitative research. Reflexivity: Situating the Researcher in Qualitative Research. Humanities and Social Science Studies, 2(2), 98–106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263916084 30. Peddle, M. (2022). Maintaining reflexivity in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Open, 9(6), 2908–2914. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.999 31. Porres, A. P. (2023). In defense of qualitative research – A PhD Researcher's experience. Sage Perspectives. https://perspectivesblog.sagepub.com/blog/sussex-hive/in-defense-of-qualitative-research-a-phd-researchers-experience 32. Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E. Y., Jang, S. G., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 56(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451 33. Quinlan, M. M. (2017). Interpretive Research. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 1–2). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0122 34. Roberts, K., Dowell, A., & Nie, J. B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; A case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y 35. Rodgers, B. L., & Cowles, K. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160309 36. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. In ANS. Advances in nursing science (Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 27–37). https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005 37. Sebele-Mpofu, F. Y. (2020). Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1838706 38. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 39. Simoni, J. M., Beima-Sofie, K., Amico, K. R., Hosek, S. G., Johnson, M. O., & Mensch, B. S. (2019). Debrief Reports to Expedite the Impact of Qualitative Research: Do They Accurately Capture Data from In-depth Interviews? AIDS and Behavior, 23(8), 2185–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-02387-3 40. Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28. 41. Taquette, S. R., & Borges da Matta Souza, L. M. (2022). Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221078731 42. Tenny, S., Brannan, G. D., Brannan, J. M., & Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2022). Qualitative Study. In StatPearls. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262162 43. Thao, L. T., Thuy, P. T., Thi, N. A., Yen, P. H., Thu, H. T. A., & Tra, N. H. (2023). Impacts of Emotional Intelligence on Second Language Acquisition: English-Major Students' Perspectives. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231212065 44. Thelwall, M., & Nevill, T. (2021). Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies. Library and Information Science Research, 43(2), 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094 45. Truong, V. D. (2022). To believe or not to believe? Truths and lies in interviews with poor people. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.4337/jqrt.2022.0004 46. Turner, J. R. (2016). Triangulation: A technique for improving validity and reducing bias. 47. Ullrich, C., Stürmlinger, A., Wensing, M., & Krug, K. (2020). Qualitative research methods in medical dissertations: an observational methodological study on prevalence and reporting quality of dissertation abstracts in a German university. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01186-6