1. Ma D, Guan B, Song L, Liu Q, Fan Y, Zhao L, et al.. A bibliometric analysis of exosomes in cardiovascular diseases from 2001 to 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med (2021) 8:734514. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.734514 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics (2015) 105(3):1809–31. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Rondanelli M, Perna S, Peroni G, Guido D. A bibliometric study of scientific literature in scopus on botanicals for treatment of androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Dermatol (2016) 15(2):120–30. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12198 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Smith DR. Bibliometrics, dermatology and contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis (2008) 59(3):133–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01405.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Chandra SP, Singh A, Goyal N, Laythalling RK, Singh M, Kale SS, et al.. Analysis of changing paradigms of management in 179 patients with spinal tuberculosis over a 12-year period and proposal of a new management algorithm. World Neurosurg (2013) 80(1-2):190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.019 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Pu QH, Lyu QJ, Su HY. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from mainland China, Japan, south Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015. BMJ Open (2016) 6(8):e011623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011623 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2004) 101(Supplement 1):5303–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307513100 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics (2010) 84(2):523–38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools[J]. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol (2014) 62(7):1382–402. doi: 10.1002/asi.21525 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Luukkonen T.: Invited review article: bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Ann Med 1990; 22: pp. 145-150.
11. Ellegaard O., Wallin J.A.: The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics 2015; 105: pp. 1809-1831.
12. Moed H.F.: New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2009; 57: pp. 13.
13. Wallin J.A.: Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 97: pp. 261-275.
14. Qin Y, Zhang Q, Liu Y. Analysis of knowledge bases and research focuses of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion from the perspective of mapping knowledge domain. Brain Res Bull (2020) 156:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.12.004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics (2010) 84(2):523–38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]