The influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on preference of undergraduate ITB students on choosing mutual fund investment platform
List of Authors
  • Timothy Joshua Sembiring

Keyword
  • perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, mutual fund investment platform, mutual fund investment, investor

Abstract
  • From the beginning of the pandemic until now, many new investors have emerged. Some securities also issue various innovations so that investors can invest effectively. Not only securities, even electronic wallet providers also work with securities so that they can invest in their e-wallet applications. In today's era, investors are given many choices in determining the desired investment platform, including mutual fund investment. This study will try to examine the effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease on the selection of a mutual fund investment platform by undergraduate students at the Bandung Institute of Technology. This research has found that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of mutual fund investment applications have a significant positive effect on the selection of mutual fund investment platforms by undergraduate students at the Bandung Institute of Technology. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of the mutual fund investment platform provider to develop the features available on the mutual fund investment platform in order to increase the perceived usefulness, and to develop the User Interface and User Experience of the platform in order to increase the perceived ease of use of the mutual fund investment platform.

Reference
  • 1. Bonn, M. A. et al. (2016). Purchasing Wine Online: The Effects of Social Influence, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Wine Involvement. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 25(7), pp. 841–869. doi: 10.1080/19368623.2016.111 5382.

    2. Bosamia, M., & Patel, D. (2018). Past to Present Overview of Mobile Wallet Payments Architectures to Compare and Identify Overall Participants. International Journal of Computer Applications, 179(48), pp. 10–18. doi: 10.5120/ijca2018917227.

    3. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), p. 1. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.201605 01.11.

    4. Firman, A. O. A., & Yasa, G. W. (2019). Analisis Komparatif Kinerja Reksadana Konvensional dan Syariah pada Periode Krisis dan Non Krisis. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 28(1), pp. 590–612.

    5. Fred D. Davis (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319–340.

    6. Mashabi, M., & Wasiaturrahma, W. (2021). Electronic Based Payment Systems and Economic Growth in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan, 6(1), p. 97. doi: 10.20473/jiet.v6 i1.26287.

    7. Gu, J.C., Lee, S.C. & Suh, Y.H. (2009). Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Mobile Banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp.11605-11616.

    8. Nur Ismail, A. R. et al. (2021). Investasi Digital Sebagai Solusi Mengurangi Perilaku Konsumtif Milenial Masa Pandemi Covid-19. CAPITAL: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 4(2), p. 125. doi: 10.25273/capital.v4i2.8742.

    9. Omarini, A. E. (2018). Fintech and the future of the payment landscape: The mobile wallet ecosystem - A challenge for retail banks?. International Journal of Financial Research, 9(4), pp. 97–116. doi: 10.5430/ijfr.v9n4p97.

    10. Pikkarainen, T. et al. (2004). Consumer Acceptance of Online Banking: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Research, 14(3), pp.224-235.

    11. Pratama, A. B., & Suputra, I. D. G. D. (2019). Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, dan Tingkat Kepercayaan Pada Minat Menggunakan Uang Elektronik. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 27, pp. 927–953. doi: EJA.2019.v27.i02.p04.

    12. Safitri, D. D., & Diana, N. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi Kegunaan Dan Persepsi Kemudahaan Pengguna Pada Minat Penggunaan Dompet Elektronik (OVO) Dalam Transaksi Keuangan. E-Jra, 09(05), pp. 92– 107.

    13. Shomad, A. C. (2012). Kemudahan, dan Persepsi Risiko Terhadap Perilaku Penggunaan E-Commerce. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawijaya, 1(2), pp. 1–20.

    14. Sugiyono (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.

    15. Supangat, A. (2007). Statistika Dalam Kajian Deskriptif, Inferensial, dan Nonparametik, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta: Kencana

    16. Tyson, E. (2012) Personal Finance for Dummies, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    17. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186–204. doi: 10.1287/ mnsc.46.2.186.11926.