Multimedia courseware for teaching Chinese as a second language
List of Authors
  • Siew Pei Hwa

Keyword
  • Usability, Interactive Multimedia, Courseware Prototype, Chinese Learning

Abstract
  • This paper introduces an interactive multimedia (IMM) courseware prototype entitled “Learn Chinese with Ease” (LCE), a specialised instructional tool developed for Teaching Chinese as a Second Language (TCSL) at tertiary level. It is restricted to non-Chinese heritage students and students with non-Chinese speaking backgrounds. This research aimed to evaluate the students’ perceived level of usability of the LCE courseware prototype for TCSL using a usability questionnaire. In order to obtain the students’ feedbacks pertaining to their experience in interacting with the LEC courseware prototype, a usability evaluation study was conducted. The research participants completed a courseware usability questionnaire (CUQ) that was designed to measure the usability of the courseware prototype focused on two quality attributes: (1) Interface Quality with two research constructs (Section A: User interface design, and Section B: Navigation and interactivity), and (2) Information Quality (Section C: Instructional Content). It also investigated the user preference through the final section in the questionnaire. The CUQ was constructed as five-point Likert scales, labelling with 1-Strongly Disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Neutral, 4-Agree and 5-Strongly Agree, which was adapted from the questionnaires by Aris et al. (2006) and Bahrudin et al. (2011). Reliability testing on CUQ using Cronbach’s alpha showed that the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of all the four sections in CUQ were above 0.8, indicating the questionnaire was well-constructed and reliable. Research participants were asked to rate their agreement with the statements in the four sections, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Results for the students’ assessment of the usability of the LCE courseware prototype show that the students had positive perceptions toward the information quality and interface quality of the LEC courseware for educational contexts to support the pedagogy of TCSL. The research findings also indicate that many students prefer using the IMM courseware in Chinese learning compared to traditional instruction methods reliant on paper textbook.

Reference
  • 1. Alelaiwi, A. & Hossain, M. S. (2015). Evaluating and testing user interfaces for e-learning system: Blackboard usability testing. Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, 5(1), 23-30. 2. Akhtar, H. (2023). NFRs: What is non functional requirements (example & types). BrowserStack. https://www.browserstack.com/guide/non-functional-requirements-examples 3. Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., & Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of interaction provided by online distance education models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 8223(6), 2733–2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a 4. Ali, A., Khalil, I., Ahmad, I., Parveen, I., & Uz Zaman, U. K. (2022). Role of non-functional requirements in projects’ success. 2022 2nd International Conference on Digital Futures and Transformative Technologies (ICoDT2) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDT255437.2022.9787463 5. Alias, A., Harun, A., & Kamaruddin, N. (2023). Principles and elements of interactive multimedia teaching aids design for hearing-impaired students. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 19(3), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2023-1903-11149 6. Aris, B., Ahmad, M. H., Kok, B. S., Ali, M. B., Harun, J., & Tasi, Z. (2006). Learning “Goal Programming” using an interactive multimedia courseware: Design factors and students’ preferences. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(1), 85-95. 7. Bahrudin, I. A., Muhammad, M., Nawawi, M. I. A., Saharudin, I. N., Mohd Din, H., Ali, M. A., & Abdullah, M. E. (2011). Development of interactive courseware for learning basic computer system components. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 132-138. 8. Bashir, K. (2019). Modeling e-learning interactivity, learner satisfaction and continuance learning intention in Ugandan higher learning institutions. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 15(1), 14-34. 9. Blanco, C. (2023). Special report: Who is studying Chinese on Duolingo? dualingo blog. https://blog.duolingo.com/who-studies-chinese-on-duolingo/ 10. David, A. (2022, May 17). Chinese language gaining popularity worldwide, says envoy. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2022/05/796959/chinese-language-gaining-popularity-worldwide-says-envoy 11. De la Torre, S. (2024). Educational software. isEazy. https://www.iseazy.com/glossary/educational-software/ 12. Ephraim, D. (2023). The power of simplicity: How minimalist website design can benefit your brand. ATAK Interactive. https://www.atakinteractive.com/blog/the-power-of-simplicity-how-minimalist-website-design-can-benefit-your-brand 13. Faghih, B., Azadehfar, M. R., & Katebi, S. D. (2013). User interface design for e-learning software. The International Journal of Soft Computing and Software Engineering [JSCSE], 3(3), 786-794. https://doi.org/10.7321/jscse.v3.n3.119 14. Galitz, W. O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques (3rd ed.). Indianapolis, Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 15. Georgiadou, E. & Economides, A. A. (2000). Evaluation factors of educational software. Proceedings IWALT 2000, International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 113-120). 16. Georgiadou, E., Economides, A. A., Michailidou, A., & Mosha, A. (2001). Evaluation of educational software designed for the purpose of teaching programming. Proceedings 9th ICCE SchoolNet 2001 International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 745-752). 17. Gupta, S. (2019). Why interactive learning is the only way to engage digital native school students. MagicBox. https://www.getmagicbox.com/blog/interactive-learning-engage-digital-native-school-students/ 18. Gupta, V., Lohia, S., Çetinkaya, D., & Kim, H. (2017). Towards a systematic literature review of non-functional requirement prioritization approaches. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications, 11(2), 1-6. 19. Hasani, L. M., Sensuse, D. I., Kautsarina, & Suryono, R. R. (2020). User-centered design of e-learning user interfaces: a survey of the practices. 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE) (pp. 300-305). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274623 20. Herianto, & Wilujeng, I. (2021). Increasing the attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction (ARCS) of students through interactive science learning multimedia. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2383 21. Jaros-White, G. (2022). Why it pays to be bilingual. Language Testing International (LTI). https://www.languagetesting.com/blog/why-it-pays-to-be-bilingual/ 22. Jarzębowicz, A. & Weichbroth, P. (2021). A systematic literature review on implementing non-functional requirements in agile software development: Issues and facilitating practices. In A. Przybyłek, J. Miler, A. Poth, & A. Riel (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Vol. 408. Lean and Agile Software Development: 5th International Conference, LASD 2021, Virtual Event, January 23, 2021 Proceedings (pp. 91-110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67084-9_6 23. Kaley, A. (2018). Match between the system and the real world (usability heuristic #2). Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/match-system-real-world/ 24. Kennedy, G., Petrovic, T., & Keppell, M. (1998). The development of multimedia evaluation criteria and a program of evaluation for computer aided learning. In Ascilite '98, Flexibility: the Next Wave? (pp. 407-415). University of Wollongong. 25. Khamayseh, B., Arman, N., & Khamayseh, F. (2022). Security requirements classification into functional and nonfunctional. In K. S. Soliman (Ed.), 40th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), 40. Article 4054822. USA: International Business Information Management Association. 26. Leem B-H. (2023). Impact of interactivity on learning outcome in online learning settings: Ordinal logit model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231203107 27. Lyons, D. (2021). The 6 hardest languages for english speakers to learn. Babbel. https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/6-hardest-languages-for-english-speakers-to-learn 28. Matias, R. M. P. C. & Agapito, B. B. (2022). Effectiveness of multimedia content as instructional methodologies to improve the quality of students learning experience during covid-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Science, 4(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2022.4.1.2 29. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 30. Monroy, M. (2023). Is Chinese hard to learn? We reveal a possibly surprising answer. Berlitz https://www.berlitz.com/blog/is-mandarin-chinese-hard-to-learn 31. Newman, L. (2023). The economic impact and effects of learning a second language [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 32. Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., & Davey. T (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 33. Rahman, Z. & Suswanto, B. (2023). User interface analysis on Shopee website using heuristic method. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 17, 336-343. 34. Ramadiani, Atan, R., Selamat, M. H., Pa, C. N., & Abdullah, R. (2013). E-learning user interface acceptance based on analysis of user's style, usability and user benefits. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v9i1.340 35. Shamat, N. A., Sulaiman, S., & Sinpang, J. S. (2017). A systematic literature review on user interface design for web applications. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-4), 57-61. 36. Sharma, A. (2024). Functional vs non-functional requirements. PrepBytes Blog. https://www.prepbytes.com/blog/dbms/functional-vs-non-functional-requirements/ 37. Sharma, V. & Kumar Tiwari, A. (2021). A study on user interface and user experience designs and its tools. World Journal of Research and Review (WJRR), 12(6), 41-44. 38. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., & Minocha, S. (2005). User interface design and evaluation. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann. 39. Sun, X., Fu, R., Zhang, G., & Chen, C. (2022). Effects of multimedia integrated fine arts education on students’ learning attitude and learning satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 907468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907468 40. Sun, Y. (2019). An analysis on the factors affecting second language acquisition and its implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1018-1022. https://.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.14 41. Teo, Y. K. Jumintono, Kriswanto, E. S., Sugiri, Handayani, E., Anggarini, Y. & Rofik, M. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia learning on academic achievement in reproduction topic science subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3625-3629. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080839 42. Tiun, S., Mokhtar, U. A., Bakar, S. H., & Saad, S. (2020). Classification of functional and non-functional requirement in software requirement using Word2vec and fast text. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(2020), 042077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042077 43. Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zait, A. (2015). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679-686. 44. Xiao, B., Su, K., & Su, X. (2020). A requirement engineering approach to user-centered design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1453(2020), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1453/1/012032 45. Zhang, C. (2022). The advantages and disadvantages of learning a second language early. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: Vol. 631. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021). (pp. 32-37). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220105.008