Exploring distributed leadership and teacher efficacy in TS25 primary schools, Sarawak
List of Authors
  • Kenny S.L Cheah , Yip Jeunbiao

Keyword
  • Distributed Leadership, Teacher Efficacy

Abstract
  • The Malaysian Education Development Plan (PPPM) 2013-2025 Wave 3, spearheaded by the Ministry of Education Malaysia, is geared towards enhancing the nation's education system. This initiative prioritizes elevating educational standards and delivering a comprehensive education to equip students for their future careers. A key focus of this plan is fostering a culture of peer leadership among educators to drive professional excellence. Consequently, this study aims to examine the correlation between distributed leadership and teachers’ efficacy in TS25 primary schools in Sarawak. Data collection involved the use of two instruments: Distributed Leadership Inventory (DLI) and the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES). Through stratified random sampling, 254 teachers from TS25 primary schools in the Sarikei district of Sarawak, Malaysia, participated in the study. Analysis reveals a generally positive perception of distributed leadership practices among teachers in these schools. Additionally, while most teachers perceive a moderate level of efficacy, smaller proportions demonstrate either low or high levels of efficacy. The findings from linear regression analysis indicate that distributed leadership significantly predicts teachers' efficacy in TS25 Primary Schools in Sarawak. In summary, this study underscores the significance of distributed leadership in shaping teacher efficacy and school outcomes, emphasizing the importance of collaboration, trust, and positive organizational climates. It underscores the necessity for policymakers, educators, and professional development providers to collaborate in promoting distributed leadership principles and empowering teachers to excel in their roles. This collaboration is crucial for ensuring the delivery of the highest quality education to all students.

Reference
  • 1. Ahmad, N., & Hamid, S. (2021). An Analysis of Instructional Leadership Practices of Primary School Head-Teachers on Teacher Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study of Teachers' Perceptions. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 5(2), 193-209. http://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2021(5-II)2.16 2. Al-Harthi, A. S. A., & Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H. (2017). Distributed leadership and school effectiveness in Egypt and Oman: An exploratory study. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(6), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0132 3. Amels, J., Krüger, M. L., Suhre, C. J., & van Veen, K. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership and inquiry-based work on primary teachers’ capacity to change: Testing a model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1746363 4. Amels, J., Krüger, M. L., Suhre, C. J., & van Veen, K. (2021). The relationship between primary school leaders’ utilization of distributed leadership and teachers’ capacity to change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 732-749 https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220915921 5. Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731 6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2. 8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. 9. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current directions in psychological science, 9(3), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064 10. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337. 11. Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2022). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational studies, 48(5), 602-624. 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301 13. Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International journal of leadership in education, 21(2), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608 14. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International journal of management reviews, 13(3), 251-269. 15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x 16. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management. Sage publications. 17. Camburn, E. M., & Han, S. W. (2009). Investigating connections between distributed leadership and instructional change. In Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 25-45). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_3 18. Chin, K. S., & Jamalul Lail, A. W. (2018). Amalan kepimpinan distributif pengetua dan hubungan dengan kepuasan kerja guru di daerah Sri Aman, Sarawak. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Future Education and Advances (pp. 174-181). 19. Çoban, Ö., & Atasoy, R. (2020). Relationship between distributed leadership, teacher collaboration and organizational innovativeness. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20679 20. Cummings, G. G., Lee, S., Tate, K., Penconek, T., Micaroni, S. P., Paananen, T., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2021). The essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and educational interventions influencing nursing leadership. International journal of nursing studies, 115, 103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103842 21. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., ... & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report. 22. De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101927 23. Engin, G. (2020). An Examination of Primary School Students' Academic Achievements and Motivation in Terms of Parents' Attitudes, Teacher Motivation, Teacher Self-Efficacy and Leadership Approach. International journal of progressive education, 16(1), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.18 24. Fullan, M. (2018). The principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. John Wiley & Sons. 25. Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational management & administration, 28(3), 317-338. 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006 27. Halim, R. A. (2017). Kepemimpinan distributif, faktor kontekstual dan efikasi kendiri guru di Malaysia. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 2(4), 47-61. 28. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2009). Distributed leadership in schools: does system policy make a difference?. In Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 101-117). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_6 29. Harris, A. (2003). Dsitributed leadership in schools: leading or misleading?. Management in Education, 16(5), 10-13 30. Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2010). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers' organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teaching and teacher education, 26(3), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.08.006 31. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary school and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840 32. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., Rosseel, Y., & Vlerick, P. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers' organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of applied social psychology, 42(7), 1745-1784.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00917.x 33. Ismail, A. R. (2013). Kajian kes strategi kepimpinan guru besar cemerlang (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). 34. Jacobson, E., Leibel, M., Pitkin, R., & Clifton, H. (2020). Strengthening all educators through mentoring and coaching. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(2). 35. Jamail, M., & Don, Y. (2017). Praktis Kepimpinan Distributif Dan Komitmen Terhadap Organisasi Berdasarkan Kohort Generasi Guru. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(1), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.612 36. Jamil, M. F., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP ON TEACHERS’COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 3(2), 10-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v3n2.p10-27 37. Jones, M., Adams, D., Hwee Joo, M. T., Muniandy, V., Perera, C. J., & Harris, A. (2015). Contemporary challenges and changes: principals' leadership practices in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(3), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1056591 38. Jose, S., & Musa, K. (2018). Pengaruh Kepimpinan Distributif Terhadap Komitmen Guru di Daerah Pitas, Sabah: The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teacher Commitment in District of Pitas, Sabah. Management Research Journal, 7, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol7.2.2018 39. Kilicoglu, D. (2018). Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools?. Educational policy analysis and strategic research, 13(3), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.150.1 40. Leithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York: Wallace Foundation. 41. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. Routledge. 42. Liu, L., Liu, P., Yang, H., Yao, H., & Thien, L. M. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being: The mediating roles of organisational trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432221113683.https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221113683 43. Liu, P. (2019). Building collective teacher efficacy through distributed leadership in Chinese primary schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 47, 70–87. 44. Liu, S., Keeley, J. W., Sui, Y., & Sang, L. (2021). Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101099 45. Liu, Y. (2021). Distributed leadership practices and student science performance through the four-path model: Examining failure in underprivileged schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 472-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0159 46. MacBeath, J. (Ed.). (1998). Effective School Leadership: Responding to Change. SAGE. 47. Melesse, S., & Gulie, K. (2019). The implementation of teachers’ continuous professional development and its impact on educational quality: primary schools in Fagita Lekoma Woreda, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia in focus. Research in Pedagogy, 9(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.93 48. Mohiuddin, Z. A. (2017). Influence of leadership style on employees performance: Evidence from literatures. Journal of Marketing and Management, 8(1), 18. 49. Mullick, J., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2013). School teachers' perception about distributed leadership practices for inclusive education in primary schools in Bangladesh. School Leadership & Management, 33(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2012.723615 50. Pont, B., Nusche, D. & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving School Leadership: Volume 1: Policy and Practice. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 51. Rabindarang, S., Khuan, W. B., & Khoo, Y. Y. (2014). Refleksi tenaga pengajar terhadap kepemimpinan distributif dan tekanan kerja dalam pendidikan teknik dan vokasional. Akademika, 84, 17-27. 52. Rosnarizah, A. H., & Zulkifli, A. M. (2009). The prevalence of distributed leadership in selected secondary schools in Malaysia. In 16th National Seminar on Management and Leadership in Education, Aminuddin Baki Institute. 53. Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M., & Erwin, B. J. (2020). Effects of Distributed Leadership on Teachers' Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship. Pedagogical research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/6439 54. Senecah, S. L. (2023). The Trinity of Voice: a framework to improve trust and ground decision making in participatory processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2238126 55. Smylie, M. A., & Denny, J. W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective. Educational administration quarterly, 26(3), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X90026003003 56. Teng, T. H., & Izham, M. (2017, November). Kepimpinan distributif dan komuniti pembelajaran profesional (KPP) di sekolah rendah. In Social Sciences Postgraduate International Seminar (SSPIS) (pp. 257-263). 57. Thien, L. M., & Chan, S. Y. (2022). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506 58. Tian, M., & Virtanen, T. (2021). Shanghai teachers’ perceptions of distributed leadership: Resources and agency. ECNU Review of Education, 4(4), 808-829. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120921051 59. Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and teacher education, 79, 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001 60. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 61. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). The influence of resources and support on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. 62. Tsigilis, N., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Koustelios, A. (2007). Applicability of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale to educators teaching innovative programs. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(7), 634-642. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710822229 63. Wahab, J. A., Hamid, A. H. A., Zainal, S., & Rafik, M. F. M. (2013). The relationship between headteachers' distributed leadership practices and teachers' motivation in national primary schools. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p161 64. Woolfolk, A., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational psychology review, 16(2), 153-176. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23363838 65. Yaakub, M. Y. bin, & Hamzah, M. I. bin M. (2020). Kepimpinan distributif pemimpin sekolah: isu dan cabaran. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 33(1), 10– 20. 66. Zakaria, M. Z. A., & Ahmad, M. H. (2022). Kepimpinan distributif terhadap efikasi kendiri dan kolektif Pentadbir dalam Pengurusan Organisasi Kokurikulum Sekolah Orang Asli. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan.