Fieldwork and the qualitative - interpretative analysis
List of Authors
  • Che Mahzan Ahmad

Keyword
  • Bracketing, bricoluer, fieldwork, hermeneutics, qualitative inquiry

Abstract
  • Fieldwork is scholarly and professional research work that requires first-hand observation, recording or documenting what one sees and hear in a particular setting with the aim to understand and to know what people under the study are doing from their perspectives. Fieldwork is a study of conceptualisation as much as observation. In qualitative fieldwork, the researcher is the instrument of inquiry. With that notion, the ontological (nature of being, becoming and/or reality), epistemological (nature of knowledge) and axiological (values) underpinnings related to the researcher are paramount importance in making the research acceptable. With an emphasis on the importance of recovering and reading meanings, beliefs and preferences or practices of the people in the field, the researcher is expected to perform hermeneutical action, with Collaizzi’s help, where the knower and the known are inseparable, interacting and influencing one another in shared interpretation. In this regard, semiotic as a device of knowing is an asset. Specifically, the researcher must get engaged with hermeneutical process of circular understanding that celebrates vorurteil (‘prejudices’). In that appreciation, verstehen, instead of erklaren, as a method of interpreting human action must be employed. Meanwhile bracketing is becoming a prerequisite for research trustworthiness. As fieldwork is a situate activity, metaphorically, turning oneself into a bricoluer makes fieldwork as an engagement a worthwhile journey. In the nutshell, as the field is a terrain of alterity that lives on ‘otherness’, fieldwork concerns with deep understanding via thick description on ‘local interpretation’ and ‘local knowledge’.

Reference
  • 1. Agar, M. H. (1996) The Professional Stranger, Bingley: Academic Press.
    2. Alasuutari, P. (1995) Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    3. Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. ( 2000) Reflexive Methodology, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    4. Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (1999) Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
    5. Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    6. Chan, Z. C. Y., Fung, Y. L., and Chien, W. T. (2013) ‘Bracketing in Phenomenology: Only Undertaken in the Data Collection and Analysis Process?’, The Qualitative Report, 18(59): 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/chan59.pdf.
    7. Collaizzi, P.F. (1978) ‘Psychological Research as Phenomenologist Views It,’ in R. S. Valle and M. King (eds.), Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology, New York:Plenum
    8. Cresswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    9. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). ‘Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research’, in N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    10. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2018) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    11. Flick, U. (2014) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
    12. Gadamer, H. G. (1985) Truth and Method, London: Continuum.
    13. Geertz, C. ( 1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: The Basic Books.
    14. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1983/2007) Ethnography: Principles and Practices, Abingdon: Routledge.
    15. Jackson, J. E (1990) ‘I am a Fieldnote’: Fieldnotes as Symbol of Professional Identity’, in R. Sanjek (ed.) Fieldnotes: The Making of Anthropology, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    16. Joseph, L., Mahler, M. and Auyero, J. (eds.) New Perspectives in Political Ethnography, New York: Springer-Verlag.
    17. Levi-Strauus, C. (1962/1966) The Savage Mind, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    18. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    19. Lincoln, Y.S. and Denzin, N. K. (2003) Turning Points in Qualitative Research, Walnut Creek: Altamira.
    20. Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. (1984) Analyzing Social Setting, Belmont: Wadsworth.
    21. Lune, H. and Berg, B. L. (2017) Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences, London:Pearson.
    22. Malinowski, B. ( 1961) Argonauts of the Western Pacific, New York: E P Dutton.
    23. Manning, P. K. ( 1987) Semiotics and Field Work. Thousand Oaks:Sage.
    24. Mantzoukas, S. (2005) The Inclusion of Bias in Reflective and Reflexive Research,’ Journal of Research in Nursing, 1(5): 279-295.
    25. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. B ( 2011) Designing Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    26. McAuley, J. (2004) ‘Hermeneutic Understanding’, in C. Cassell and G. Symon (eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    27. Pezalla, A.E., Pettigrew, J. and Miller-Day, M. (2012) ‘Researching the Researcher as an Instrument’, Qual Res, April, 12 (2): 165-185.
    28. Rowan, J. and Reason, P. (1981) Human Inquiry, Chichester: John Wiley
    29. Rhodes, P. (2015) ‘Qualitative Inquiry: Past, Present, & Future’, Qualitative Report, 20(8): 1329-1331.
    30. Rhodes, R. A. W., Paul, H. and Noordegraaf. M. (Eds.) (2007) Observing Government Elites: Up Close and Personal, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
    31. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls C.M. and Ormston, R. (2014) Qualitative Research Practice, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    32. Robinson-Aberdeen, P. and Markless, S. ( 2012) ‘Applying the Principles of Researcher as Bricoluer to Conducting Research in Education’, Madrid Conference Paper. Retrieved from https://theperapractice.files.wordpress.com/2012/.../conference-paper-2012-madrid1.pdf.
    33. Sanders, C. (2003) ‘Application of Colaizzi's Method: Interpretation of an by a Novice Researcher’, Contemporary Nurse Journal, 14(3): 292- 302.
    34. Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    35. Spradley, . (1980) Participant Observation, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    36. Sumser, J. (2001) A Guide to Empirical Research in Communication, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    37. Wachterhauser, B.R. (1994) Hermeneutics and Truth, Evanston: North Western University Press.
    38. Weinstein, D. and Weinstein, M.A. (1991) Georg Simmel: Sociological Flaneur Bricoluer, Theory, Culture and Society, 8: 151-168.
    39. Wolcott, H. F. (1995) The Art of Fieldwork, Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.